CyberTracker
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 44 keywords for CyberTracker in Apple App Store
CyberTracker tracks 44 keywords (4 keywords rank; 40 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.2, difficulty 37.4, best rank 21.
Tracked keywords
44
4 ranked • 40 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 21 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: animals
Avg difficulty
37.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.0
animals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 145
- 65.8
animal
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 147
- 67.4
since
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 138
- 64.2
purpose
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 50
- 63.7
base
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 106
Unranked opportunities
animals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 145
animal
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 147
since
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 138
purpose
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 50
base
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 106
High competition keywords
way
Total apps: 115,752 • Major competitors: 1,945
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
data
Total apps: 97,664 • Major competitors: 1,018
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
user
Total apps: 77,167 • Major competitors: 982
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.3
first
Total apps: 56,085 • Major competitors: 908
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.2
used
Total apps: 50,553 • Major competitors: 504
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| conservation | 70 | 100 | 29 | 48 764 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | 21 | 21 | 3 major competitor apps |
| metadata | 70 | 100 | 31 | 50 1,085 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | 94 | 94 | 9 major competitor apps |
| data collection | 71 | 100 | 32 | 54 1,657 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0 | 118 | 115 | 7 major competitor apps |
| cyber | 70 | 100 | 31 | 50 979 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | 118 | 118 | 19 major competitor apps |
| software | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,499 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 172 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 50,553 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 504 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 115,752 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,945 major competitor apps |
| evolved | 69 | 100 | 30 | 47 644 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |
| become | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 44,433 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,156 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 50 | 81 77,167 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 982 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 97,664 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,018 major competitor apps |
| allow | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 23,984 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 275 major competitor apps |
| animals | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 8,100 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 145 major competitor apps |
| record | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 36,300 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 409 major competitor apps |
| details | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 29,963 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 388 major competitor apps |
| developed | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 21,270 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 138 major competitor apps |
| animal | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 9,069 competing apps Median installs: 414 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 147 major competitor apps |
| since | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 11,366 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 138 major competitor apps |
| purpose | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 7,258 competing apps Median installs: 305 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 50 major competitor apps |
| trackers | 70 | 100 | 36 | 49 937 competing apps Median installs: 761 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 29 major competitor apps |
| first | 68 | 100 | 49 | 79 56,085 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 908 major competitor apps |
| communicate | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 15,344 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 133 major competitor apps |
| handheld | 70 | 100 | 30 | 50 968 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| base | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 6,776 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 106 major competitor apps |
| killed | 69 | 100 | 26 | 43 374 competing apps Median installs: 725 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
App Description
The software was first developed as a way to allow illiterate animal trackers to communicate their environmental observations. A prototype was used in 2002 to record details of animals killed in an outbreak of ebola. It has since evolved to become a general purpose data capture and visualization system. However, it retains the ability to be used by illiterate and low-literate users.
CyberTracker's primary user base is wildlife biologists, conservationists and disaster relief workers.