Classic Yamb

Developer: Aleksa Racovic

Category: Games

Add App to Comparison

100 installs

2.00 ratings

4.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 29 keywords for Classic Yamb in Apple App Store

Developer: Aleksa Racovic Category: games Rating: 3

Classic Yamb tracks 29 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 29 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.4, difficulty 42.5.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 29 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.4

Top keyword: second

Avg difficulty

42.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

second

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 168
67.9
third

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 135
62.5
certain

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 188
66.7
showing

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 68
63.8
four

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 176
67.9

Unranked opportunities

second

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 168
third

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 135
certain

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Competitors: 188
showing

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 68
four

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 176

High competition keywords

make

Total apps: 158,974 • Major competitors: 2,939

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.6
full

Total apps: 68,923 • Major competitors: 1,062

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.8
first

Total apps: 56,085 • Major competitors: 908

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.2
turn

Total apps: 50,545 • Major competitors: 1,165

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
various

Total apps: 48,728 • Major competitors: 730

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.2

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
try	69	100	50	77 43,238 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	951 major competitor apps
make	65	100	55	86 158,974 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,939 major competitor apps
goal	71	100	45	72 22,260 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	316 major competitor apps
score	71	100	46	73 23,632 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	438 major competitor apps
various	69	100	48	78 48,728 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	730 major competitor apps
second	73	100	42	68 12,195 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	168 major competitor apps
full	68	100	51	80 68,923 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,062 major competitor apps
two	70	100	46	75 31,406 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	438 major competitor apps
points	71	100	47	73 25,846 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	495 major competitor apps
third	73	100	39	63 5,754 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	135 major competitor apps
turn	69	100	51	78 50,545 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,165 major competitor apps
certain	73	100	44	67 10,277 competing apps Median installs: 1,000 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	188 major competitor apps
number	69	100	50	78 47,451 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	713 major competitor apps
scoring	72	100	38	61 4,548 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	75 major competitor apps
another	71	100	44	71 19,578 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	279 major competitor apps
first	68	100	49	79 56,085 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	908 major competitor apps
times	71	100	45	72 22,529 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	363 major competitor apps
showing	73	100	43	64 6,856 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	68 major competitor apps
three	71	100	45	72 22,066 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	327 major competitor apps
least	70	100	49	74 30,249 competing apps Median installs: 1,300 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	950 major competitor apps
dice	71	100	37	57 2,548 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	59 major competitor apps
rolling	71	100	36	56 2,369 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	51 major competitor apps
four	73	100	42	68 12,134 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	176 major competitor apps
five	73	100	44	65 7,996 competing apps Median installs: 510 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	116 major competitor apps
sum	70	100	32	52 1,269 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	11 major competitor apps

App Description

Score points by rolling five dice to make certain combinations. The dice can be rolled up to three times in a turn to try to make various scoring combinations. Goal is to score as mush as you can.

* Straight: 1-2-3-4-5 or 2-3-4-5-6 sequence (Score 66 after first roll, 56 after second roll, 46 after third roll)
* Full house: Three dice with one number and two with another (Score 30 + Sum of all five dice)
* Poker: At least four dice showing the same number (Score 40 + Sum of those four dice)
* Yamb: All five dice showing the same number (Score 50 + Sum of all five dice)