JAX P3 - Pitch Shifter III

Developer: Jens Guell

Category: Music & Audio

Add App to Comparison

250 installs

5.00 ratings

21 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 62 keywords for JAX P3 - Pitch Shifter III in Apple App Store

Developer: Jens Guell Category: music_and_audio Rating: 4

JAX P3 - Pitch Shifter III tracks 62 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 62 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.6, difficulty 39.5.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 62 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.6

Top keyword: excellent

Avg difficulty

39.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

excellent

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 106
65.0
series

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 255
68.6
approach

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 94
66.9
term

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 166
67.3
mix

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 243
66.4

Unranked opportunities

excellent

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 106
series

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Competitors: 255
approach

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 94
term

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 166
mix

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 243

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
like

Total apps: 143,203 • Major competitors: 3,240

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
using

Total apps: 115,141 • Major competitors: 1,548

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
way

Total apps: 107,117 • Major competitors: 1,932

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
real

Total apps: 87,189 • Major competitors: 1,770

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
audio	70	100	47	76 32,553 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	400 major competitor apps
used	69	100	49	79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	502 major competitor apps
way	66	100	53	84 107,117 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,932 major competitor apps
using	66	100	53	85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,548 major competitor apps
time	65	100	55	88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,966 major competitor apps
excellent	73	100	40	65 7,657 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	106 major competitor apps
small	71	100	47	73 23,426 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	348 major competitor apps
series	73	100	44	69 12,613 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	255 major competitor apps
approach	73	100	46	67 9,942 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	94 major competitor apps
real	67	100	54	83 87,189 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,770 major competitor apps
like	65	100	56	86 143,203 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	3,240 major competitor apps
across	69	100	53	78 45,489 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	955 major competitor apps
entire	71	100	46	73 22,698 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	331 major competitor apps
possible	71	100	45	72 20,756 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	269 major competitor apps
term	73	100	43	67 10,496 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	166 major competitor apps
mix	73	100	42	66 9,256 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	243 major competitor apps
shifting	69	100	29	48 717 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	9 major competitor apps
changed	71	100	35	58 2,931 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	28 major competitor apps
final	73	100	40	65 7,539 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	100 major competitor apps
phase	71	100	34	55 2,004 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	34 major competitor apps
amount	73	100	42	68 11,007 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	186 major competitor apps
pitch	72	100	36	58 3,095 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	45 major competitor apps
well	69	100	48	78 43,947 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	530 major competitor apps
corresponding	72	100	40	61 4,210 competing apps Median installs: 332 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	38 major competitor apps
side	73	100	42	67 9,851 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	162 major competitor apps

App Description

Our frequency domain approach for pitch shifting will use the “phase vocoder” method, that effectively is an FFT/inverse FFT. The term “vocoder” is somewhat misleading here, because it has nothing to do with a real “vocoder”.

FFT will introduce latency too, but the buffers can be kept relatively small and the input can be shifted by exactly this fixed amount of latency for the final mix internally.

Complex mathematical formulas will be used to extract the frequency components from the signal and their corresponding magnitudes. After the frequency is known, it can be modified in controlled manner, thus making pitch and frequency shifting possible in realtime.

If the frequency was modified across all magnitudes equally, the inverse FFT is applied, leaving the audio with a changed pitch. Like the time domain approach of JAX ESSENTIAL SERIES P2, this will produce “chipmonkeyfication” effects, because all transients and formants will be shifted this way too, proportional with the fundamental frequency.

The frequency domain approach has some side effects too. The audio will be smeared slightly but equally across the entire range. Grainy results are less audible than with the time domain approach. It is not well situated for using with strong transient audio material. Excellent results can be achieved with ambient audio material.