Ax Performance Test
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 32 keywords for Ax Performance Test in Apple App Store
Ax Performance Test tracks 32 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 31 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.9, difficulty 37.0, best rank 16.
Tracked keywords
32
1 ranked • 31 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 16 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: less
Avg difficulty
37.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.4
less
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 114
- 71.2
individual
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 103
- 59.2
stack
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 36.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 57
- 61.3
frame
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 37.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 33
- 70.3
total
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 121
Unranked opportunities
less
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 114
individual
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 103
stack
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 36.2 • Competitors: 57
frame
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 37.0 • Competitors: 33
total
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 121
High competition keywords
simple
Total apps: 96,318 • Major competitors: 749
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.3
based
Total apps: 80,525 • Major competitors: 607
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.7
via
Total apps: 57,496 • Major competitors: 378
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.2
device
Total apps: 49,227 • Major competitors: 442
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.6
number
Total apps: 44,335 • Major competitors: 338
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| performance | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 23,527 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | 16 | 16 | 120 major competitor apps |
| device | 69 | 100 | 48 | 79 49,227 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 442 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 48 | 80 57,496 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 378 major competitor apps |
| individual | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,873 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 103 major competitor apps |
| rate | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 19,734 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 153 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 21,622 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 272 major competitor apps |
| simple | 67 | 100 | 50 | 83 96,318 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 749 major competitor apps |
| following | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 28,557 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 259 major competitor apps |
| stack | 72 | 100 | 36 | 59 3,436 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 57 major competitor apps |
| calculated | 71 | 100 | 35 | 58 2,775 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 12 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 80,525 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 607 major competitor apps |
| number | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 44,335 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 338 major competitor apps |
| per | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 22,359 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
| times | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 20,516 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 170 major competitor apps |
| body | 71 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,991 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 118 major competitor apps |
| frame | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,558 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 33 major competitor apps |
| total | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 15,784 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 121 major competitor apps |
| visible | 72 | 100 | 36 | 59 3,417 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 25 major competitor apps |
| cube | 71 | 100 | 32 | 53 1,539 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 23 major competitor apps |
| cpu | 69 | 100 | 28 | 46 570 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| less | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 12,159 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 114 major competitor apps |
| cubes | 70 | 100 | 31 | 50 1,028 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| polygons | 67 | 100 | 23 | 36 139 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| physics | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,159 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 55 major competitor apps |
| gpu | 67 | 100 | 22 | 36 143 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 0 major competitor apps |
App Description
Measures CPU and GPU performance. Drops cubes until the frame rate averages less than 60. Cubes stack and tumble following rigid body physics properties.
CPU performance is measured via physics performance and GPU is measured via the number of cubes your device can render.
Displays visible polygons per second.
A total score is calculated based on the number of cubes times the polygons per second.
Leaderboards for each individual GPU chip.