AppGoblinAx Performance Test
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 32 keywords for Ax Performance Test in Apple App Store
Ax Performance Test tracks 32 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 31 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 41.5, difficulty 39.9, best rank 16.
Tracked keywords
32
1 ranked • 31 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 16 • Latest leader 16
Avg opportunity
41.5
Top keyword: performance
Avg difficulty
39.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.2
performance
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank 16
Competitors: 113
- 74.6
device
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 425
- 75.1
via
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 427
- 60.8
individual
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 101
- 64.7
rate
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 144
Unranked opportunities
device
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.3 • Competitors: 425
via
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.0 • Competitors: 427
individual
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.5 • Competitors: 101
rate
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 144
simple
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.5 • Competitors: 695
High competition keywords
simple
Total apps: 3,416 • Major competitors: 695
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
based
Total apps: 3,039 • Major competitors: 697
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
via
Total apps: 2,102 • Major competitors: 427
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
device
Total apps: 1,985 • Major competitors: 425
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
number
Total apps: 1,666 • Major competitors: 332
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| performance | 58 | 100 | 43 | 63 623 competing apps Median installs: 242,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | 16 | 16 | 113 major competitor apps |
| device | 58 | 100 | 55 | 75 1,985 competing apps Median installs: 265,675 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 425 major competitor apps |
| via | 58 | 100 | 55 | 75 2,102 competing apps Median installs: 260,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 427 major competitor apps |
| individual | 58 | 100 | 45 | 61 489 competing apps Median installs: 247,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 101 major competitor apps |
| rate | 58 | 100 | 47 | 65 724 competing apps Median installs: 244,638 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 144 major competitor apps |
| score | 20 | 100 | 52 | 68 977 competing apps Median installs: 314,100 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 264 major competitor apps |
| simple | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,416 competing apps Median installs: 254,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 695 major competitor apps |
| following | 58 | 100 | 47 | 70 1,211 competing apps Median installs: 266,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 263 major competitor apps |
| stack | 20 | 100 | 42 | 52 201 competing apps Median installs: 299,175 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 54 major competitor apps |
| calculated | 57 | 100 | 32 | 42 71 competing apps Median installs: 239,800 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| based | 58 | 100 | 58 | 79 3,039 competing apps Median installs: 256,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 697 major competitor apps |
| number | 58 | 100 | 54 | 73 1,666 competing apps Median installs: 249,538 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 332 major competitor apps |
| per | 58 | 100 | 48 | 70 1,201 competing apps Median installs: 242,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 246 major competitor apps |
| times | 58 | 100 | 50 | 67 945 competing apps Median installs: 227,225 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 165 major competitor apps |
| body | 58 | 100 | 44 | 64 677 competing apps Median installs: 242,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 118 major competitor apps |
| frame | 57 | 100 | 36 | 50 165 competing apps Median installs: 264,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 33 major competitor apps |
| total | 58 | 100 | 51 | 61 508 competing apps Median installs: 238,700 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 113 major competitor apps |
| visible | 57 | 100 | 31 | 46 104 competing apps Median installs: 249,012 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 22 major competitor apps |
| cube | 57 | 100 | 33 | 45 98 competing apps Median installs: 271,188 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 22 major competitor apps |
| cpu | 56 | 96 | 20 | 26 13 competing apps Median installs: 178,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| less | 58 | 100 | 54 | 62 567 competing apps Median installs: 297,650 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 130 major competitor apps |
| cubes | 20 | 100 | 38 | 38 47 competing apps Median installs: 246,575 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 13 major competitor apps |
| polygons | 0 | 41 | 51 | 18 5 competing apps Median installs: 233,325 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| physics | 57 | 100 | 38 | 57 333 competing apps Median installs: 246,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 52 major competitor apps |
| gpu | 0 | 63 | 14 | 22 8 competing apps Median installs: 165,750 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 0 major competitor apps |
App Description
Measures CPU and GPU performance. Drops cubes until the frame rate averages less than 60. Cubes stack and tumble following rigid body physics properties.
CPU performance is measured via physics performance and GPU is measured via the number of cubes your device can render.
Displays visible polygons per second.
A total score is calculated based on the number of cubes times the polygons per second.
Leaderboards for each individual GPU chip.