Ax Performance Test
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 32 keywords for Ax Performance Test in Apple App Store
Ax Performance Test tracks 32 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 31 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.8, difficulty 39.2, best rank 16.
Tracked keywords
32
1 ranked • 31 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 16 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: less
Avg difficulty
39.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.3
less
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 206
- 59.4
stack
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 94
- 61.4
frame
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 70
- 70.5
total
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 245
- 59.4
visible
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 36.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 47
Unranked opportunities
less
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.3 • Competitors: 206
stack
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 94
frame
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Competitors: 70
total
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.7 • Competitors: 245
visible
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 36.6 • Competitors: 47
High competition keywords
simple
Total apps: 98,968 • Major competitors: 1,442
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6
based
Total apps: 79,669 • Major competitors: 1,056
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.1
via
Total apps: 56,889 • Major competitors: 762
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.2
device
Total apps: 50,271 • Major competitors: 845
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.1
number
Total apps: 44,765 • Major competitors: 705
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| performance | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 24,352 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | 16 | 16 | 243 major competitor apps |
| device | 69 | 100 | 50 | 79 50,271 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 845 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 56,889 competing apps Median installs: 443 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 762 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 45 | 71 18,196 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 196 major competitor apps |
| rate | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 20,106 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 306 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 22,053 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 437 major competitor apps |
| simple | 67 | 100 | 52 | 84 98,968 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,442 major competitor apps |
| following | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 28,825 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 469 major competitor apps |
| stack | 72 | 100 | 39 | 59 3,549 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 94 major competitor apps |
| calculated | 71 | 100 | 35 | 58 2,753 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 79,669 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,056 major competitor apps |
| number | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 44,765 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 705 major competitor apps |
| per | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 22,125 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 384 major competitor apps |
| times | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 20,926 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 359 major competitor apps |
| body | 71 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,474 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 242 major competitor apps |
| frame | 72 | 100 | 38 | 61 4,644 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 70 major competitor apps |
| total | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 16,237 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 245 major competitor apps |
| visible | 72 | 100 | 37 | 59 3,560 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 47 major competitor apps |
| cube | 71 | 100 | 35 | 53 1,554 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| cpu | 69 | 100 | 29 | 46 578 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| less | 73 | 100 | 45 | 68 12,037 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 206 major competitor apps |
| cubes | 70 | 100 | 36 | 50 1,026 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 21 major competitor apps |
| polygons | 67 | 100 | 34 | 36 139 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| physics | 72 | 100 | 40 | 62 5,256 competing apps Median installs: 900 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 115 major competitor apps |
| gpu | 67 | 100 | 22 | 36 141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
App Description
Measures CPU and GPU performance. Drops cubes until the frame rate averages less than 60. Cubes stack and tumble following rigid body physics properties.
CPU performance is measured via physics performance and GPU is measured via the number of cubes your device can render.
Displays visible polygons per second.
A total score is calculated based on the number of cubes times the polygons per second.
Leaderboards for each individual GPU chip.