APSI Bench
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 85 keywords for APSI Bench in Apple App Store
APSI Bench tracks 85 keywords (3 keywords rank; 82 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.2, difficulty 41.0, best rank 15.
Tracked keywords
85
3 ranked • 82 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 15 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: tests
Avg difficulty
41.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.4
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 94
- 66.1
interested
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 107
- 67.5
random
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 207
- 66.4
displayed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 68
- 67.3
term
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 166
Unranked opportunities
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 94
interested
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Competitors: 107
random
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Competitors: 207
displayed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 68
term
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 166
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
every
Total apps: 120,649 • Major competitors: 2,494
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
designed
Total apps: 114,471 • Major competitors: 1,080
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
different
Total apps: 95,103 • Major competitors: 1,687
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
available
Total apps: 89,249 • Major competitors: 1,834
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| smooth performance | 68 | 100 | 28 | 41 263 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3 | 15 | 15 | 5 major competitor apps |
| cpu | 69 | 100 | 29 | 46 578 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | 61 | 61 | 7 major competitor apps |
| performance | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 24,352 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | 94 | 83 | 243 major competitor apps |
| single | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 37,414 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 605 major competitor apps |
| users | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 60,732 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 667 major competitor apps |
| audio | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 32,553 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 400 major competitor apps |
| product | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 22,970 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 300 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 502 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 114,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,080 major competitor apps |
| aimed | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,207 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| built | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 27,167 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 256 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 89,249 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,834 major competitor apps |
| apple | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 41,559 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,159 major competitor apps |
| test | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 38,610 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 710 major competitor apps |
| tests | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,075 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 94 major competitor apps |
| every user | 69 | 100 | 27 | 43 379 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 4 major competitor apps |
| interface | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 39,818 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 327 major competitor apps |
| pro | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 22,515 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 463 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 77,117 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,352 major competitor apps |
| real | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 87,189 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,770 major competitor apps |
| want | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 83,664 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,431 major competitor apps |
| every | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 120,649 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,494 major competitor apps |
| user | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 66,932 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 967 major competitor apps |
| interested | 73 | 100 | 43 | 66 8,948 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 107 major competitor apps |
App Description
A decisive extension is the newly built in long-term measurement. Here the app carries out the ray tracing tests with all available CPUs over a long period of time that can be set by the user (up to 30 minutes). The result is then displayed in graphic form. If problems arise with overheating of the CPU cores, this will be visible in the graphic.
Finally, the app is also a technology demonstration. The entire interface was designed in SwiftUI 2, with gorgeous animations being used. The app will also be offered as a universal app for macOS.