FIT Count

Developer: Centre for Ecology

Category: Books & Reference

Add App to Comparison

50 installs

1.00 ratings

6.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 54 keywords for FIT Count in Apple App Store

Developer: Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Category: books_and_reference Rating: 5

FIT Count tracks 54 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 54 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.0, difficulty 41.0.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 54 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.0

Top keyword: coming

Avg difficulty

41.0

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

coming

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 222
68.7
minute

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 230
67.8
done

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 194
67.9
amount

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 186
67.6
groups

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 91
65.6

Unranked opportunities

coming

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Competitors: 222
minute

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.2 • Competitors: 230
done

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.5 • Competitors: 194
amount

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 186
groups

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.9 • Competitors: 91

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
new

Total apps: 182,994 • Major competitors: 3,792

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
help

Total apps: 150,250 • Major competitors: 2,451

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
designed

Total apps: 114,471 • Major competitors: 1,080

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
track

Total apps: 109,353 • Major competitors: 1,552

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
new	65	100	56	88 182,994 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	3,792 major competitor apps
changes	72	100	44	69 13,260 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	203 major competitor apps
collect	70	100	50	76 33,298 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	977 major competitor apps
within	68	100	51	81 67,459 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,296 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	52	85 114,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,080 major competitor apps
time	65	100	55	88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,966 major competitor apps
help	65	100	55	87 150,250 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,451 major competitor apps
track	66	100	53	84 109,353 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,552 major competitor apps
many	67	100	51	82 77,117 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,352 major competitor apps
suitable	72	100	43	69 13,644 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	184 major competitor apps
fit	72	100	45	70 16,105 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	339 major competitor apps
see	67	100	54	83 93,156 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,752 major competitor apps
much	68	100	50	79 53,679 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	932 major competitor apps
guide	70	100	46	75 30,981 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	322 major competitor apps
quick	68	100	51	80 62,662 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	908 major competitor apps
coming	73	100	43	69 12,795 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	222 major competitor apps
minute	73	100	45	68 11,333 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	230 major competitor apps
done	73	100	44	68 11,448 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	194 major competitor apps
numbers	72	100	43	69 13,971 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	212 major competitor apps
identify	71	100	45	72 20,374 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	345 major competitor apps
data	67	100	51	83 86,751 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,000 major competitor apps
north	72	100	39	62 5,125 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	95 major competitor apps
even	67	100	53	82 81,181 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,850 major competitor apps
amount	73	100	42	68 11,007 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	186 major competitor apps
europe	71	100	35	54 1,614 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	24 major competitor apps

App Description

The Flower-Insect Timed Count (FIT Count) is a 10-minute survey designed to collect new data on numbers of flower-visiting insects.

FIT Counts are suitable for all, in urban or rural locations, and can be done at any time during the FIT Count season – see the quick guide
for the season in your country.

An increasing amount of evidence suggests that pollinator species diversity has declined in many parts of the world, with the strongest evidence coming from Europe and North America. Less is known about changes in pollinator abundance, and we need much more data to be able to track this. You can help by doing a FIT Count, maybe even repeating it over the season. You don’t need to identify the insects to species level, only to within broad groups e.g. bumblebees, hoverflies, butterflies & moths, wasps.