PANDA MOBILE
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 94 keywords for PANDA MOBILE in Apple App Store
PANDA MOBILE tracks 94 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 94 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.7, difficulty 40.3.
Tracked keywords
94
0 ranked • 94 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.7
Top keyword: vision
Avg difficulty
40.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.1
vision
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 122
- 63.9
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 126
- 68.0
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 143
- 67.8
term
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 266
- 64.1
affordable
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 172
Unranked opportunities
vision
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 122
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 126
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 143
term
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 266
affordable
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 172
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 130,500 • Major competitors: 2,212
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
using
Total apps: 114,117 • Major competitors: 2,308
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
data
Total apps: 97,902 • Major competitors: 1,521
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
unique
Total apps: 88,303 • Major competitors: 2,916
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.2
us
Total apps: 79,970 • Major competitors: 2,171
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| health | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 43,652 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 767 major competitor apps |
| art | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 25,524 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 624 major competitor apps |
| collect | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 35,543 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,401 major competitor apps |
| sensing | 69 | 100 | 26 | 44 431 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 3.7 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 50,340 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 738 major competitor apps |
| limited | 72 | 100 | 47 | 70 16,191 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 475 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,117 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,308 major competitor apps |
| life | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 63,795 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,485 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 130,500 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,212 major competitor apps |
| goal | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 22,316 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 471 major competitor apps |
| video | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 49,667 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,383 major competitor apps |
| vision | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 8,257 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 122 major competitor apps |
| test | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 42,197 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 993 major competitor apps |
| tests | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 7,014 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 126 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 28,143 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 524 major competitor apps |
| motor | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,244 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 119 major competitor apps |
| tools | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 36,309 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 836 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 48 | 79 53,524 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 573 major competitor apps |
| bring | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 30,717 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 918 major competitor apps |
| develop | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 14,593 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 367 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 79,867 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 981 major competitor apps |
| without | 67 | 100 | 51 | 81 79,484 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,066 major competitor apps |
| year | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 19,297 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 580 major competitor apps |
| brain | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 17,830 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 726 major competitor apps |
| videos | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 34,045 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 938 major competitor apps |
App Description
Significance: In the USA, 1 in 10 infants are born at risk for these disabilities. Early treatment in the first year of life improves long-term outcomes. Today’s clinical tests are however less than adequate. Hard to administer, they require specialized training, and have limited long-term predictive value. There is a critical need for an objective, accurate, easy-to-use tool for early prediction of long-term physical disability. This project’s goal is to develop an automated assessment for early and accurate detection of infants at risk for neurodevelopmental disabilities by capitalizing on state of the art sensing and machine learning technologies. Our project will bring us closer to a universal non-invasive test for early detection of neurodevelopmental disabilities. This test will scale to infants worldwide, producing an affordable tool for infant health assessment.
Objectives: Our project has three aims. This effort focuses on aim 2 which is to populate a database of infant videos. We aim to collect at least 1200 unique infant videos (400 with early brain injury, 400 preterm without early brain injury, 400 controls). From the videos we will develop a computer vision algorithm to quantify infant motor performance.
Funding: Our project is being funded by the National Institutes of Health – National Institutes of Child Health and Development: R01- HD-097686. We are in partnership with AngelEye Health, a leader in developing cameras for the NICU and monitoring infants."