Spades: Classic Card Game

Developer: Gamos Mobile Limited

Category: Games

~2.6K - 5.2K

52 ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 64 keywords for Spades: Classic Card Game in Apple App Store

Developer: Gamos Mobile Limited Category: games Rating: 3.35

Spades: Classic Card Game tracks 64 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 64 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 49.6, difficulty 40.5.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 64 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

49.6

Top keyword: play

Avg difficulty

40.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

play

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,269
85.4
make

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,773
88.4
every

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,637
86.9
try

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 496
76.2
individual

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 101
60.8

Unranked opportunities

play

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.2 • Competitors: 1,269
make

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Competitors: 1,773
every

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Competitors: 1,637
try

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.5 • Competitors: 496
individual

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.5 • Competitors: 101

High competition keywords

make

Total apps: 8,094 • Major competitors: 1,773

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7
every

Total apps: 6,989 • Major competitors: 1,637

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.5
play

Total apps: 5,992 • Major competitors: 1,269

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.2
least

Total apps: 2,792 • Major competitors: 562

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
always

Total apps: 2,705 • Major competitors: 630

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
play	59	100	57	85 5,992 competing apps Median installs: 263,338 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,269 major competitor apps
try	58	100	53	76 2,347 competing apps Median installs: 264,825 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	496 major competitor apps
make	59	100	63	88 8,094 competing apps Median installs: 266,850 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,773 major competitor apps
individual	58	100	45	61 489 competing apps Median installs: 247,475 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	101 major competitor apps
goal	58	100	44	65 764 competing apps Median installs: 244,162 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	151 major competitor apps
intuitive	58	100	48	72 1,513 competing apps Median installs: 238,275 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	270 major competitor apps
contract	57	100	29	40 60 competing apps Median installs: 269,012 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	12 major competitor apps
flexible	57	100	46	59 405 competing apps Median installs: 254,425 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	85 major competitor apps
ai	58	100	53	71 1,363 competing apps Median installs: 253,250 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	284 major competitor apps
playing	58	100	51	74 1,891 competing apps Median installs: 281,375 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	424 major competitor apps
always	58	100	56	78 2,705 competing apps Median installs: 275,550 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	630 major competitor apps
players	58	100	52	76 2,386 competing apps Median installs: 274,388 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	554 major competitor apps
player	58	100	52	70 1,267 competing apps Median installs: 248,225 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	284 major competitor apps
every	59	100	62	87 6,989 competing apps Median installs: 280,925 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,637 major competitor apps
user	58	100	52	77 2,498 competing apps Median installs: 242,250 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	453 major competitor apps
must	58	100	51	72 1,481 competing apps Median installs: 253,250 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	288 major competitor apps
win	20	100	51	73 1,736 competing apps Median installs: 331,712 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	470 major competitor apps
winning	20	100	50	68 1,040 competing apps Median installs: 333,950 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	268 major competitor apps
two	58	100	49	70 1,253 competing apps Median installs: 238,750 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	249 major competitor apps
trick	20	100	34	46 102 competing apps Median installs: 359,825 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	30 major competitor apps
entire	58	100	48	66 864 competing apps Median installs: 240,688 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	165 major competitor apps
thinking	58	100	42	60 433 competing apps Median installs: 287,975 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	102 major competitor apps
points	58	100	55	70 1,245 competing apps Median installs: 288,325 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	308 major competitor apps
round	57	100	44	56 292 competing apps Median installs: 258,625 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	63 major competitor apps
levels	58	100	51	76 2,262 competing apps Median installs: 271,788 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	521 major competitor apps

App Description

Features:

• User friendly intuitive interface
• Flexible AI adjusts to any player
• Easy-to-use, responsive controls
• Three levels of difficulty
• Deep concentration you engage in while playing Spades results in clearer thinking and a cheerful disposition

The goal of Spades is to reach 500 points with your team. Players sitting opposite each other play as a team. The game begins with a round of bidding. You try to predict the number of "tricks", or turns, you will win. The combined bids of two partners make a "contract". Once the bidding is completed, the partners must fulfill their contract, not the individual bids. You make a contract by winning at least a contracted number of tricks. A bid of Nil means the player will try not to win any tricks. The "trump" (or highest value) suit is always Spades. Each contracted trick is worth 10 points. If you fail to fulfill the contract, a penalty is the entire value of that contract. Each overtrick, or taking more than you bid, is worth 1 point and also earns you one "bag". Every set of 10 "bags" incurs a 100-point penalty. Winning a Nil bid is worth 100 points, failing a Nil bid is penalized by 100 points.