Epicor Kinetic POD Lite
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 45 keywords for Epicor Kinetic POD Lite in Apple App Store
Epicor Kinetic POD Lite tracks 45 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 45 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.6, difficulty 39.7.
Tracked keywords
45
0 ranked • 45 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.6
Top keyword: productivity
Avg difficulty
39.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.2
productivity
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 72
- 66.3
integration
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 110
- 67.6
perform
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 107
- 63.0
mobile device
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 109
- 63.5
pack
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 86
Unranked opportunities
productivity
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 72
integration
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 110
perform
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 107
mobile device
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 109
pack
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 86
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 130,005 • Major competitors: 1,612
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.2
data
Total apps: 97,664 • Major competitors: 1,018
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
device
Total apps: 54,518 • Major competitors: 851
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.0
directly
Total apps: 52,031 • Major competitors: 716
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.5
platform
Total apps: 50,941 • Major competitors: 386
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| productivity | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 8,289 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 72 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 54,518 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 851 major competitor apps |
| design | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 40,744 competing apps Median installs: 541 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 678 major competitor apps |
| modern | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 25,982 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 316 major competitor apps |
| built | 71 | 100 | 45 | 74 26,992 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 258 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 130,005 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,612 major competitor apps |
| directly | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 52,031 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 716 major competitor apps |
| interface | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 45,335 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 338 major competitor apps |
| integration | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 9,778 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 110 major competitor apps |
| saved | 72 | 100 | 47 | 69 13,832 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 193 major competitor apps |
| perform | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 11,630 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 107 major competitor apps |
| mobile device | 73 | 100 | 41 | 63 6,179 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 109 major competitor apps |
| increased | 72 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,787 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 29 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 97,664 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,018 major competitor apps |
| shipment | 70 | 100 | 31 | 50 1,026 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 10 major competitor apps |
| seamlessly | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 16,284 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 245 major competitor apps |
| platform | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 50,941 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 386 major competitor apps |
| workforce | 71 | 100 | 34 | 54 1,853 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 17 major competitor apps |
| logistics | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,346 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| signature | 72 | 100 | 40 | 61 4,766 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 92 major competitor apps |
| enable | 72 | 100 | 45 | 69 14,232 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 217 major competitor apps |
| delivery | 71 | 100 | 50 | 73 25,587 competing apps Median installs: 422 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 354 major competitor apps |
| pack | 73 | 100 | 40 | 63 6,555 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 86 major competitor apps |
| developed | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 21,270 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 138 major competitor apps |
| seamless | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 37,812 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 377 major competitor apps |
App Description
Featuring paperless signature capture, photographic proof of delivery, and a modern interface built on the Kinetic Design System, it has the essential capabilities to enable the logistics workforce to perform fast, accurate, and paperless proof of delivery.
Epicor Mfg POD Lite integrates seamlessly with the Epicor ERP platform, with shipment confirmation, photos/images, and proof of delivery signatures saved directly from the mobile device to each Pack ID record.
- Paperless: Capture signatures and photographic proof of delivery
- Real-time, seamless integration with the Epicor ERP platform for increased productivity and data accuracy
- Modern interface built on the Kinetic Design System