iReadMore
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 86 keywords for iReadMore in Apple App Store
iReadMore tracks 86 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 86 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.5, difficulty 40.8.
Tracked keywords
86
0 ranked • 86 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: university
Avg difficulty
40.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.0
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 19
- 66.2
driven
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 69
- 64.4
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 83
- 64.6
accuracy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 66
- 68.0
started
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 162
Unranked opportunities
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 19
driven
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 69
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 83
accuracy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Competitors: 66
started
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 162
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 183,070 • Major competitors: 3,373
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.7
free
Total apps: 164,925 • Major competitors: 3,441
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
help
Total apps: 150,247 • Major competitors: 2,104
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.8
information
Total apps: 112,148 • Major competitors: 943
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.7
see
Total apps: 93,205 • Major competitors: 1,574
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| free | 65 | 100 | 54 | 87 164,925 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 3,441 major competitor apps |
| new | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 183,070 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 3,373 major competitor apps |
| word | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 23,796 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 325 major competitor apps |
| 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 35,948 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 494 major competitor apps | |
| single | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 37,413 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 515 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 41,636 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 612 major competitor apps |
| users | 68 | 100 | 49 | 80 60,763 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 568 major competitor apps |
| scientists | 70 | 100 | 30 | 49 817 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 19,343 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 118 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 84 112,148 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 943 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 40,927 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 776 major competitor apps |
| control | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 65,563 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 800 major competitor apps |
| people | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 52,098 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 780 major competitor apps |
| london | 70 | 100 | 33 | 52 1,342 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 54 | 87 150,247 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 2,104 major competitor apps |
| university | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,679 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 19 major competitor apps |
| collected | 72 | 100 | 38 | 61 4,436 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| reading | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 20,061 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 191 major competitor apps |
| driven | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 9,010 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 69 major competitor apps |
| understanding | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 14,216 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 73 major competitor apps |
| test | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 38,603 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 618 major competitor apps |
| effective | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 16,268 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 116 major competitor apps |
| tests | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 7,079 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 83 major competitor apps |
| complete | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 65,752 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,067 major competitor apps |
| improve | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 45,266 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 527 major competitor apps |
App Description
It is for people with an acquired reading disorder (alexia) or aphasia due to a stroke, brain injury or dementia.
Start your 7 day free trial now!
iReadMore Features:
Adaptive Algorithm - iReadMore adapts to your abilities, keeping the therapy relevant and challenging.
Self-led Therapy - iReadMore allows you to be in control of your own therapy with unlimited access.
Science-Driven and Clinically-Proven Results - All of our therapies are developed through years of dedicated research at University College London by a team of scientists and clinicians.
Integrated Feedback - Complete reading tests and see your own progress.
iReadMore Research Summary:
- iReadMore therapy has been tested in two clinical trials. It was shown to improve reading ability in people with pure alexia (Woodhead et al., 2013) and central alexia (Woodhead et al., 2018)
- In the clinical trial of iReadMore for central alexia (the most common form of acquired reading disorder), the average improvement in reading accuracy was 8.7% for trained words. Three months after finishing the therapy, users still had significantly better reading ability than before they started.
- Anonymised results from the app will be collected to test how effective the app is and to improve our understanding of reading rehabilitation.
For more information and help getting started with iReadMore, please visit: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/icn/research/research-groups/neurotherapeutics/therapy-apps/ireadmore-app
If you have any other questions, please email us at ireadmore@ucl.ac.uk
iReadMore is a Class I CE marked medical device.