iReadMore
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 86 keywords for iReadMore in Apple App Store
iReadMore tracks 86 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 86 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 52.0, difficulty 41.4.
Tracked keywords
86
0 ranked • 86 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
52.0
Top keyword: free
Avg difficulty
41.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 89.9
free
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 2,147
- 91.1
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 2,341
- 85.2
help
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,236
- 83.3
see
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 64.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,122
- 67.3
word
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 205
Unranked opportunities
free
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.5 • Competitors: 2,147
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Competitors: 2,341
help
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Competitors: 1,236
see
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 64.7 • Competitors: 1,122
word
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.5 • Competitors: 205
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 10,701 • Major competitors: 2,341
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.9
free
Total apps: 9,480 • Major competitors: 2,147
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.5
help
Total apps: 5,873 • Major competitors: 1,236
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.1
see
Total apps: 4,836 • Major competitors: 1,122
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.7
us
Total apps: 4,260 • Major competitors: 915
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| free | 59 | 100 | 63 | 90 9,480 competing apps Median installs: 264,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2,147 major competitor apps |
| new | 59 | 100 | 64 | 91 10,701 competing apps Median installs: 270,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2,341 major competitor apps |
| word | 58 | 100 | 49 | 67 941 competing apps Median installs: 260,450 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 205 major competitor apps |
| 58 | 100 | 52 | 71 1,408 competing apps Median installs: 263,500 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 303 major competitor apps | |
| single | 58 | 100 | 50 | 72 1,511 competing apps Median installs: 234,575 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 294 major competitor apps |
| better | 58 | 100 | 53 | 75 2,000 competing apps Median installs: 250,162 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 450 major competitor apps |
| users | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,979 competing apps Median installs: 259,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 430 major competitor apps |
| scientists | 56 | 100 | 23 | 34 32 competing apps Median installs: 241,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| medical | 58 | 100 | 39 | 59 418 competing apps Median installs: 192,125 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| information | 58 | 100 | 57 | 78 2,704 competing apps Median installs: 252,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 572 major competitor apps |
| team | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,972 competing apps Median installs: 284,662 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 445 major competitor apps |
| control | 58 | 100 | 54 | 76 2,353 competing apps Median installs: 243,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 466 major competitor apps |
| people | 58 | 100 | 60 | 75 2,083 competing apps Median installs: 271,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 492 major competitor apps |
| london | 57 | 100 | 30 | 39 54 competing apps Median installs: 232,225 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 10 major competitor apps |
| help | 59 | 100 | 61 | 85 5,873 competing apps Median installs: 257,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,236 major competitor apps |
| university | 57 | 100 | 31 | 41 67 competing apps Median installs: 211,800 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| collected | 57 | 100 | 37 | 49 146 competing apps Median installs: 197,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 28 major competitor apps |
| reading | 58 | 100 | 47 | 63 623 competing apps Median installs: 224,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 108 major competitor apps |
| driven | 57 | 100 | 37 | 55 280 competing apps Median installs: 241,212 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| understanding | 57 | 100 | 37 | 55 266 competing apps Median installs: 199,150 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 39 major competitor apps |
| test | 58 | 100 | 50 | 73 1,727 competing apps Median installs: 258,500 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 389 major competitor apps |
| effective | 58 | 100 | 40 | 60 432 competing apps Median installs: 200,750 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 59 major competitor apps |
| tests | 20 | 100 | 39 | 54 232 competing apps Median installs: 269,488 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 59 major competitor apps |
| complete | 58 | 100 | 52 | 78 2,946 competing apps Median installs: 253,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 625 major competitor apps |
| improve | 58 | 100 | 50 | 74 1,897 competing apps Median installs: 240,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 379 major competitor apps |
App Description
It is for people with an acquired reading disorder (alexia) or aphasia due to a stroke, brain injury or dementia.
Start your 7 day free trial now!
iReadMore Features:
Adaptive Algorithm - iReadMore adapts to your abilities, keeping the therapy relevant and challenging.
Self-led Therapy - iReadMore allows you to be in control of your own therapy with unlimited access.
Science-Driven and Clinically-Proven Results - All of our therapies are developed through years of dedicated research at University College London by a team of scientists and clinicians.
Integrated Feedback - Complete reading tests and see your own progress.
iReadMore Research Summary:
- iReadMore therapy has been tested in two clinical trials. It was shown to improve reading ability in people with pure alexia (Woodhead et al., 2013) and central alexia (Woodhead et al., 2018)
- In the clinical trial of iReadMore for central alexia (the most common form of acquired reading disorder), the average improvement in reading accuracy was 8.7% for trained words. Three months after finishing the therapy, users still had significantly better reading ability than before they started.
- Anonymised results from the app will be collected to test how effective the app is and to improve our understanding of reading rehabilitation.
For more information and help getting started with iReadMore, please visit: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/icn/research/research-groups/neurotherapeutics/therapy-apps/ireadmore-app
If you have any other questions, please email us at ireadmore@ucl.ac.uk
iReadMore is a Class I CE marked medical device.