RTAB-Map - 3D LiDAR Scanner
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 88 keywords for RTAB-Map - 3D LiDAR Scanner in Apple App Store
RTAB-Map - 3D LiDAR Scanner tracks 88 keywords (5 keywords rank; 83 need traction). Key metrics: 20% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.1, difficulty 41.1, best rank 7.
Tracked keywords
88
5 ranked • 83 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
20%
Best rank 7 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.1
Top keyword: source
Avg difficulty
41.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.6
source
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 109
- 66.5
scanning
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 123
- 66.1
format
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 98
- 66.9
approach
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 94
- 66.2
session
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 101
Unranked opportunities
source
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 109
scanning
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Competitors: 123
format
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 98
approach
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 94
session
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 101
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
new
Total apps: 182,994 • Major competitors: 3,792
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
help
Total apps: 150,250 • Major competitors: 2,451
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
available
Total apps: 89,249 • Major competitors: 1,834
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.7
data
Total apps: 86,751 • Major competitors: 1,000
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| open source | 70 | 100 | 32 | 50 948 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | 7 | 7 | 7 major competitor apps |
| mapping | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,176 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | 218 | 26 | 23 major competitor apps |
| wider | 70 | 100 | 32 | 52 1,231 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | 31 | 31 | 9 major competitor apps |
| spatial | 71 | 100 | 37 | 56 2,205 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | 141 | 109 | 30 major competitor apps |
| visualization | 71 | 100 | 34 | 55 2,053 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | 204 | 204 | 11 major competitor apps |
| new | 65 | 100 | 56 | 88 182,994 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,792 major competitor apps |
| online | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 67,632 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,285 major competitor apps |
| source | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 10,905 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 109 major competitor apps |
| export | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 17,147 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 226 major competitor apps |
| words | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 22,887 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 258 major competitor apps |
| live | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 61,698 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,158 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 502 major competitor apps |
| image | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 25,919 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 297 major competitor apps |
| management | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 42,405 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 336 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 85,036 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,597 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 89,249 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,834 major competitor apps |
| added | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 19,916 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 404 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 150,250 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,451 major competitor apps |
| note | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 15,010 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 260 major competitor apps |
| scanning | 73 | 100 | 44 | 66 9,382 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 123 major competitor apps |
| format | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 8,880 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 98 major competitor apps |
| open | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 38,256 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 719 major competitor apps |
| good | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 32,154 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 580 major competitor apps |
| visual | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 24,454 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 301 major competitor apps |
App Description
* Note that unlike other scanning apps that optimize the map only after mapping, with RTAB-Map you get loop closure detection and map optimization online so you can have a live feedback to know when you have enough constraints in the map for good global optimization before stopping the scan.
*** 3D reconstruction available only with LiDAR sensor.
Features:
* Online 3D scanning/mapping of the environment.
* Online loop closure detection and map correction.
* Save in DB format (RTAB-Map desktop and rtabmap_ros format).
* Export in PLY, LAS or OBJ.
* Multi-session mapping (save and continue later).
* Use Apriltags to help finding loop closures in textureless environments.
* Mixed AR/VR First-Person in visualization mode.
* Raw ARKit data recording (up to 60 Hz!), useful to record long sessions without comprising battery life.