Digi-DDx

Developer: OSF Healthcare System

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

150 installs

3.00 ratings

10 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 64 keywords for Digi-DDx in Apple App Store

Developer: OSF Healthcare System Category: medical Rating: 3.67

Digi-DDx tracks 64 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 63 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.3, difficulty 42.4, best rank 121.

Tracked keywords

1 ranked • 63 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 121 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.3

Top keyword: simulation

Avg difficulty

42.4

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

simulation

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 183
64.7
hope

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 112
67.6
easy access

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 91
64.6
university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 29
64.0
tests

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 94
64.4

Unranked opportunities

simulation

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 183
hope

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Competitors: 112
easy access

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 91
university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 29
tests

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 94

High competition keywords

access

Total apps: 163,515 • Major competitors: 2,635

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
make

Total apps: 159,506 • Major competitors: 2,928

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
help

Total apps: 150,250 • Major competitors: 2,451

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
easy

Total apps: 142,080 • Major competitors: 2,039

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
using

Total apps: 115,141 • Major competitors: 1,548

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
diagnosis	71	100	35	56 2,153 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	126	121	24 major competitor apps
simulation	73	100	41	65 7,344 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	183 major competitor apps
right	67	100	54	82 83,347 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,631 major competitor apps
easy	66	100	53	86 142,080 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,039 major competitor apps
make	65	100	55	87 159,506 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,928 major competitor apps
users	68	100	50	80 60,732 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	667 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	52	85 114,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,080 major competitor apps
valuable	72	100	43	69 14,148 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	156 major competitor apps
choose	67	100	53	83 90,146 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,766 major competitor apps
using	66	100	53	85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,548 major competitor apps
built	70	100	46	74 27,167 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	256 major competitor apps
hope	73	100	42	68 10,938 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	112 major competitor apps
provide	68	100	49	79 55,996 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	558 major competitor apps
goal	71	100	45	72 20,483 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	311 major competitor apps
help	65	100	55	87 150,250 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,451 major competitor apps
easy access	73	100	40	65 7,267 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	91 major competitor apps
university	73	100	40	64 6,678 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	29 major competitor apps
access	65	100	55	87 163,515 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,635 major competitor apps
diagnostic	71	100	34	56 2,102 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	9 major competitor apps
test	69	100	48	77 38,610 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	710 major competitor apps
tests	73	100	40	64 7,075 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	94 major competitor apps
provides	67	100	49	81 72,728 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	564 major competitor apps
patient	73	100	39	64 6,705 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	33 major competitor apps
tool	69	100	48	78 48,500 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	379 major competitor apps
fill	73	100	44	68 12,357 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	315 major competitor apps

App Description

This app is designed for early clinicians to practice using diagnostic testing to arrive at a simulated patient's diagnosis. Patient histories are provided - the goal of playing is to choose diagnostic tests to get to the right diagnosis as efficiently as possible.

Each test accrues additional expense, and users can compare their costs to that of the experienced clinician. Just as in real life, making incorrect choices still provides valuable learning as feedback from experienced clinicians follows diagnosis selections.

In addition, some cases will also provide opportunity for making choices in patient management, with clinical feedback provided for all selections. Hyperlinks to relevant literature are included for easy access to further information.

Once diagnosis is made, users will have opportunity to provide specific feedback through a survey link - we hope you'll fill it out and help faculty make this as useful a learning tool as possible!

This app was built through a partnership between Jump Simulation and faculty from the University of Illinois College of Medicine.