Seeing The Invisible
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 108 keywords for Seeing The Invisible in Apple App Store
Seeing The Invisible tracks 108 keywords (2 keywords rank; 106 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.4, difficulty 39.5, best rank 13.
Tracked keywords
108
2 ranked • 106 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 13 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.4
Top keyword: themes
Avg difficulty
39.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.0
themes
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 206
- 63.2
collaboration
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 60
- 67.0
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 176
- 63.9
nature
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 84
- 66.1
present
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 96
Unranked opportunities
themes
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 206
collaboration
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Competitors: 60
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 176
nature
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 84
present
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 96
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 182,347 • Major competitors: 3,800
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.8
mobile
Total apps: 130,035 • Major competitors: 1,613
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.2
features
Total apps: 126,027 • Major competitors: 2,126
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
view
Total apps: 108,078 • Major competitors: 1,318
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
different
Total apps: 100,117 • Major competitors: 1,707
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| seeing | 72 | 100 | 40 | 58 3,218 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | 13 | 13 | 47 major competitor apps |
| invisible | 70 | 100 | 32 | 49 913 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.0 | 24 | 24 | 18 major competitor apps |
| new | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 182,347 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,800 major competitor apps |
| themes | 73 | 100 | 43 | 65 8,161 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 206 major competitor apps |
| augmented reality | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,071 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 43 major competitor apps |
| collaboration | 73 | 100 | 44 | 63 6,341 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| art | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 25,517 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 415 major competitor apps |
| order | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 66,456 competing apps Median installs: 444 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 801 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 83,360 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,121 major competitor apps |
| digital | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 52,249 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 719 major competitor apps |
| international | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 16,876 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 263 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 130,035 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,613 major competitor apps |
| various | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,723 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 729 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 24,447 competing apps Median installs: 528 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 478 major competitor apps |
| explore | 68 | 100 | 53 | 80 67,919 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,354 major competitor apps |
| around | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 49,539 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,035 major competitor apps |
| view | 67 | 100 | 52 | 84 108,078 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,318 major competitor apps |
| open | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 41,395 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 736 major competitor apps |
| current | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 72,988 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,490 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,733 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 176 major competitor apps |
| viewers | 70 | 100 | 30 | 49 901 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| without | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 79,932 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,429 major competitor apps |
| nature | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 6,926 competing apps Median installs: 585 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 84 major competitor apps |
| features | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 126,027 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,126 major competitor apps |
| spaces | 72 | 100 | 37 | 58 3,151 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 40 major competitor apps |
App Description
The exhibition features thirteen augmented reality (AR) works by established artists from various countries. Co-curators, Hadas Maor (curator of contemporary art) and Tal Michael Haring (virtual and augmented reality expert and curator) worked with the artists to select existing works as well as commission new ones, and to position these new experiential artworks in unique spots in each of the participating botanical gardens. As institutions holding documented collections of living plants for the purpose of scientific research, conservation, display, and education, botanical gardens are hybrids in their own right, blending nature and cultivation, order and coincidence.
Setting these digital experiences inside botanical gardens, without disturbing the preservations, and keeping the carbon footprint to a minimum, the exhibition addresses themes pertaining to nature, environment, and sustainability and explores the boundaries and connections between art, technology, and nature. Both bleak and hopeful, each artwork offers a unique perspective on these unresolved issues, creating thought-provoking, experiential, and contemplative spaces for the viewers to immerse in.
As viewers are invited to explore the botanical gardens and actively locate the artworks scattered throughout them, they