CPS Test - clicks per second
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 105 keywords for CPS Test - clicks per second in Apple App Store
CPS Test - clicks per second tracks 105 keywords (7 keywords rank; 98 need traction). Key metrics: 14% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.6, difficulty 41.2, best rank 4.
Tracked keywords
105
7 ranked • 98 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
14%
Best rank 4 • Latest leader 47
Avg opportunity
70.6
Top keyword: seconds
Avg difficulty
41.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.3
seconds
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank 47
Competitors: 129
- 63.6
fastest
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank 86
Competitors: 138
- 67.8
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 166
- 67.4
higher
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 207
- 68.2
low
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 245
Unranked opportunities
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 166
higher
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Competitors: 207
low
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Competitors: 245
term
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 166
finger
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 182
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 159,506 • Major competitors: 2,928
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
like
Total apps: 143,203 • Major competitors: 3,240
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
easy
Total apps: 142,080 • Major competitors: 2,039
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
using
Total apps: 115,141 • Major competitors: 1,548
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
designed
Total apps: 114,471 • Major competitors: 1,080
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| clicks | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,242 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | 4 | 4 | 31 major competitor apps |
| seconds | 73 | 100 | 42 | 66 9,211 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | 47 | 47 | 129 major competitor apps |
| click | 71 | 100 | 45 | 74 25,137 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | 208 | 58 | 269 major competitor apps |
| single click | 69 | 100 | 28 | 45 481 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | 77 | 72 | 9 major competitor apps |
| fastest | 73 | 100 | 41 | 64 6,340 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | 86 | 86 | 138 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 26,375 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.0 | 171 | 89 | 511 major competitor apps |
| clicking | 72 | 100 | 37 | 60 3,693 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | 113 | 113 | 30 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 52,042 competing apps Median installs: 583 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,181 major competitor apps |
| change | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 38,601 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 777 major competitor apps |
| easy | 66 | 100 | 53 | 86 142,080 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,039 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 159,506 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,928 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 114,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,080 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 107,117 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,932 major competitor apps |
| working | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 19,941 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 251 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,548 major competitor apps |
| rate | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 20,106 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 305 major competitor apps |
| function | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 13,888 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 156 major competitor apps |
| take | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 95,526 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,742 major competitor apps |
| test | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 38,610 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 710 major competitor apps |
| technique | 71 | 100 | 35 | 58 2,856 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 71 | 100 | 45 | 74 24,710 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 317 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 49,502 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 752 major competitor apps |
| hand | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 12,975 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 240 major competitor apps |
| easily | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 85,676 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,259 major competitor apps |
| good | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 32,154 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 580 major competitor apps |
App Description
What is it? On CPS-Test, we provide:
Great click
Great show
Click-through rate graph after each test
Your click rate history
Click speed level after each test
CPS-Test draws a chart of the click speed during the test so that you can see the change in the click speed over time. This is a very important function that helps to detect muscle fatigue, especially during prolonged testing.
What is a good click speed?
The average person can easily click for 10-60 seconds at a clicking speed of 5-7. This is a very common number that can be achieved through conventional click technology.
Any click speed higher than 7 can be considered a good result. Ordinary players can get this number in a short-term trial.
A click speed of 10 or higher is a good result, usually cannot be achieved with conventional click techniques, and requires some advanced skills.
Click Technology
As mentioned above, there is more than one way to click. Let's take a quick look at these methods.
Regular Click (Butterfly Click)
Just like when you are working on a PC, just click. This is natural and easy to do, but not very fast-ordinary players can achieve a maximum click speed of 5-8 using this method.
Butterfly click
This technique requires the use of two fingers on the mouse button. In short, it is to click continuously with two fingers. Using this method, professional gamers can get up to 30 click speeds. This technique is most suitable for a mouse that allows double-clicking. Otherwise, the click speed gain will not be too great.
Jitter Click
Jitter clicks are another way to increase click speed, but require more training to use the game. The basis of this method is to force the hand to the position where the mouse clicks, and then quickly press the mouse button with your finger like a woodpecker. Seen from the side, the hand is shaking, and it feels the same. This technique is almost impossible to aim, and requires non-slip mouse buttons and desktop surfaces. Low DPI, heavy mouse and good pads will make aiming possible. 12-