AAGL Endo Classification

Developer: Medicinia

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

500 installs

10 ratings

15 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 37 keywords for AAGL Endo Classification in Apple App Store

Developer: Medicinia Category: medical Rating: 3.5

AAGL Endo Classification tracks 37 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 36 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.1, difficulty 39.6, best rank 17.

Tracked keywords

1 ranked • 36 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 17 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.1

Top keyword: chosen

Avg difficulty

39.6

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

chosen

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 143
64.5
determine

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 70
64.3
scale

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 68
64.0
scores

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 156
66.7
cut

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 168
63.3

Unranked opportunities

chosen

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 143
determine

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 70
scale

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 68
scores

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 156
cut

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 168

High competition keywords

create

Total apps: 119,326 • Major competitors: 2,292

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.7
using

Total apps: 115,141 • Major competitors: 1,548

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
designed

Total apps: 114,471 • Major competitors: 1,080

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
within

Total apps: 67,459 • Major competitors: 1,296

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.7
level

Total apps: 52,042 • Major competitors: 1,181

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.2

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
classification	70	100	30	50 1,014 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	17	17	6 major competitor apps
level	68	100	50	79 52,042 competing apps Median installs: 583 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,181 major competitor apps
within	68	100	51	81 67,459 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,296 major competitor apps
used	69	100	49	79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	502 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	52	85 114,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,080 major competitor apps
using	66	100	53	85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,548 major competitor apps
score	71	100	46	73 22,053 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	438 major competitor apps
create	66	100	55	85 119,326 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,292 major competitor apps
across	69	100	53	78 45,489 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	955 major competitor apps
points	70	100	47	74 25,929 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	485 major competitor apps
component	70	100	32	53 1,436 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	7 major competitor apps
chosen	73	100	41	65 7,188 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	143 major competitor apps
along	71	100	47	74 25,541 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	393 major competitor apps
scoring	72	100	38	61 4,159 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	75 major competitor apps
distribution	71	100	35	58 2,811 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	15 major competitor apps
system	69	100	47	77 41,100 competing apps Median installs: 398 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	407 major competitor apps
operating	72	100	38	62 5,054 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	69 major competitor apps
determine	73	100	40	64 7,002 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	70 major competitor apps
scale	73	100	40	64 6,706 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	68 major competitor apps
scores	73	100	42	67 9,655 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	156 major competitor apps
total	72	100	45	70 16,237 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	245 major competitor apps
basis	72	100	37	59 3,336 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	50 major competitor apps
closely	70	100	53	53 1,477 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	10 major competitor apps
sum	70	100	32	51 1,189 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	11 major competitor apps
surgical	70	100	30	50 956 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	2 major competitor apps

App Description

The sum of the component scores across all anatomic sites defines the total score, which is used to determine the complexity stage.

The 3 cut points along the distribution of the AAGL total score were chosen using receiver operating characteristic curves to create 4 stages within the AAGL scoring system that most closely corresponded with the 4-level scale of surgical complexity for endometriosis designed to categorize each surgery on the basis of its highest-complexity task.

Stage 1 ≤ 8 points
Stage 2 9-15 points
Stage 3 16-21 points
Stage 4 >21 points