TV File Transfer
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 91 keywords for TV File Transfer in Apple App Store
TV File Transfer tracks 91 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 91 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.9, difficulty 39.7.
Tracked keywords
91
0 ranked • 91 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: tv
Avg difficulty
39.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.6
tv
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 188
- 68.5
documents
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 79
- 64.7
method
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 37
- 66.4
longer
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 81
- 66.8
wifi
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 124
Unranked opportunities
tv
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 188
documents
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 79
method
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 37
longer
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 81
wifi
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 124
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 161,747 • Major competitors: 1,351
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.8
like
Total apps: 141,867 • Major competitors: 1,791
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
mobile
Total apps: 119,282 • Major competitors: 792
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
using
Total apps: 116,102 • Major competitors: 770
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.2
features
Total apps: 114,935 • Major competitors: 1,080
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| file manager | 69 | 100 | 27 | 44 431 competing apps Median installs: 225 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
| music | 70 | 100 | 46 | 76 32,490 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 304 major competitor apps |
| share | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 112,492 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 932 major competitor apps |
| mobile apps | 70 | 100 | 29 | 49 793 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| tv | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 10,939 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 188 major competitor apps |
| users | 68 | 100 | 48 | 80 61,242 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 360 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 46 | 77 37,648 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 277 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 68,121 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 656 major competitor apps |
| content | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 55,121 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 496 major competitor apps |
| limited | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 14,685 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 189 major competitor apps |
| file | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 14,537 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 91 major competitor apps |
| people | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 51,261 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 490 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 116,102 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 770 major competitor apps |
| convenient | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 27,595 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 206 major competitor apps |
| traditional | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 15,619 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 118 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 119,282 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 792 major competitor apps |
| various | 69 | 100 | 47 | 79 49,165 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 331 major competitor apps |
| discover | 68 | 100 | 49 | 80 60,176 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 734 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 53 | 87 161,747 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,351 major competitor apps |
| smart | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 47,764 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 401 major competitor apps |
| screens | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,274 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 17 major competitor apps |
| want | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 84,370 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 731 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 52 | 86 141,867 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,791 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 49 | 82 80,790 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 281 major competitor apps |
| without | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 81,130 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 700 major competitor apps |
App Description
TV File Transfer bridges this gap and allows the users to send and receive data amongst your smart devices with screens like smartphones and smartTV. The app allows transferring various types of data like photos, music files, video/movie files, documents, etc.
The main features of the app:
* Allow transfer amongst smart devices (with screens): Users are able to share media files, documents with unlimited size without worrying about compressing the data
* Auto-discover devices with the same app installed: The application automatically discovers the devices which have the “TV File Transfer” app installed within the same WiFi network
* Faster data transfer over WiFi network: Since the app allows the transfer of the data over WiFi network, it is much faster than doing it over the traditional method using Bluetooth
* Covers smart-devices in long-range: Since the app uses a WiFi network to transfer data and media files, it works in a longer range than the range covered with the traditional method using Bluetooth
* Access received data or media files within the app: The app allows access to the received data or media files within the app so that you don’t need to be dependent on the File Manager