TV File Transfer
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 91 keywords for TV File Transfer in Apple App Store
TV File Transfer tracks 91 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 91 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.9, difficulty 41.8.
Tracked keywords
91
0 ranked • 91 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: tv
Avg difficulty
41.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.6
tv
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 351
- 68.4
documents
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 168
- 64.7
method
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 76
- 66.3
longer
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 165
- 66.8
wifi
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 229
Unranked opportunities
tv
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.1 • Competitors: 351
documents
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Competitors: 168
method
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 76
longer
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 165
wifi
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 229
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 163,515 • Major competitors: 2,634
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
like
Total apps: 143,203 • Major competitors: 3,240
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
mobile
Total apps: 120,211 • Major competitors: 1,595
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
features
Total apps: 116,039 • Major competitors: 2,106
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
using
Total apps: 115,141 • Major competitors: 1,549
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| file manager | 69 | 100 | 30 | 44 434 competing apps Median installs: 1,200 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| music | 70 | 100 | 51 | 76 32,739 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 580 major competitor apps |
| share | 66 | 100 | 55 | 85 113,889 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,785 major competitor apps |
| mobile apps | 70 | 100 | 29 | 48 789 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| tv | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 11,013 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 351 major competitor apps |
| users | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 60,732 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 667 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 37,834 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 559 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 67,459 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,297 major competitor apps |
| content | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 55,812 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 944 major competitor apps |
| limited | 72 | 100 | 48 | 70 14,848 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 335 major competitor apps |
| file | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 14,696 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 192 major competitor apps |
| people | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 52,098 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 908 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,549 major competitor apps |
| convenient | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 27,769 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 411 major competitor apps |
| traditional | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 15,869 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 221 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 120,211 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,595 major competitor apps |
| various | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,881 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 723 major competitor apps |
| discover | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 61,210 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,369 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 163,515 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,634 major competitor apps |
| smart | 69 | 100 | 50 | 79 49,322 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 785 major competitor apps |
| screens | 71 | 100 | 36 | 56 2,259 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 28 major competitor apps |
| want | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 83,664 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,433 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 56 | 86 143,203 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,240 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 80,365 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 658 major competitor apps |
| without | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 80,325 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,420 major competitor apps |
App Description
TV File Transfer bridges this gap and allows the users to send and receive data amongst your smart devices with screens like smartphones and smartTV. The app allows transferring various types of data like photos, music files, video/movie files, documents, etc.
The main features of the app:
* Allow transfer amongst smart devices (with screens): Users are able to share media files, documents with unlimited size without worrying about compressing the data
* Auto-discover devices with the same app installed: The application automatically discovers the devices which have the “TV File Transfer” app installed within the same WiFi network
* Faster data transfer over WiFi network: Since the app allows the transfer of the data over WiFi network, it is much faster than doing it over the traditional method using Bluetooth
* Covers smart-devices in long-range: Since the app uses a WiFi network to transfer data and media files, it works in a longer range than the range covered with the traditional method using Bluetooth
* Access received data or media files within the app: The app allows access to the received data or media files within the app so that you don’t need to be dependent on the File Manager