Vectors and Planes
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 35 keywords for Vectors and Planes in Apple App Store
Vectors and Planes tracks 35 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 35 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 52.9, difficulty 37.1.
Tracked keywords
35
0 ranked • 35 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
52.9
Top keyword: step
Avg difficulty
37.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 71.5
step
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 298
- 74.6
users
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 430
- 69.5
list
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 251
- 67.2
completely
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 178
- 70.1
two
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 249
Unranked opportunities
step
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.9 • Competitors: 298
users
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Competitors: 430
list
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.5 • Competitors: 251
completely
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.5 • Competitors: 178
two
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.5 • Competitors: 249
High competition keywords
based
Total apps: 3,039 • Major competitors: 697
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
users
Total apps: 1,979 • Major competitors: 430
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
helps
Total apps: 1,794 • Major competitors: 389
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
step
Total apps: 1,454 • Major competitors: 298
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.9
two
Total apps: 1,253 • Major competitors: 249
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sheet | 57 | 100 | 28 | 40 57 competing apps Median installs: 201,900 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| step | 58 | 100 | 49 | 72 1,454 competing apps Median installs: 257,975 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 298 major competitor apps |
| users | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,979 competing apps Median installs: 259,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 430 major competitor apps |
| list | 58 | 100 | 52 | 70 1,187 competing apps Median installs: 244,150 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 251 major competitor apps |
| hope | 57 | 100 | 38 | 57 322 competing apps Median installs: 206,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 52 major competitor apps |
| completely | 58 | 100 | 46 | 67 937 competing apps Median installs: 232,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 178 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 20 | 100 | 33 | 42 70 competing apps Median installs: 268,688 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 18 major competitor apps |
| two | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,253 competing apps Median installs: 238,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 249 major competitor apps |
| feedback | 58 | 100 | 48 | 66 871 competing apps Median installs: 261,525 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 186 major competitor apps |
| provided | 58 | 100 | 45 | 61 515 competing apps Median installs: 271,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 109 major competitor apps |
| understand | 58 | 100 | 44 | 65 776 competing apps Median installs: 244,462 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 142 major competitor apps |
| standard | 58 | 100 | 43 | 62 541 competing apps Median installs: 259,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 114 major competitor apps |
| graphs | 57 | 100 | 31 | 46 108 competing apps Median installs: 213,562 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| based | 58 | 100 | 58 | 79 3,039 competing apps Median installs: 256,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 697 major competitor apps |
| form | 58 | 100 | 48 | 63 616 competing apps Median installs: 232,138 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 127 major competitor apps |
| point | 58 | 100 | 44 | 61 502 competing apps Median installs: 255,125 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 118 major competitor apps |
| visualize | 57 | 100 | 38 | 51 186 competing apps Median installs: 212,488 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 35 major competitor apps |
| line | 58 | 100 | 49 | 66 804 competing apps Median installs: 296,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 192 major competitor apps |
| three | 58 | 100 | 46 | 67 945 competing apps Median installs: 241,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 175 major competitor apps |
| plane | 57 | 100 | 67 | 45 97 competing apps Median installs: 194,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 15 major competitor apps |
| combinations | 57 | 100 | 40 | 56 292 competing apps Median installs: 229,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 56 major competitor apps |
| helps | 58 | 100 | 55 | 74 1,794 competing apps Median installs: 249,500 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 389 major competitor apps |
| structures | 57 | 100 | 28 | 42 72 competing apps Median installs: 176,012 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
| explained | 56 | 100 | 25 | 30 21 competing apps Median installs: 280,875 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| vector | 57 | 100 | 25 | 37 44 competing apps Median installs: 271,438 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 4 major competitor apps |
App Description
List of linear structures and combinations:
1. Two vector combination.
2. Plane.
3. Line and plane combination.
4. Two plane combination.
5. Three plane combination.
Current list of quadric structures:
1. Two sphere combination.
2. Standard ellipsoid.
3. Ellipsoid in a form of positive-definite matrix.
4. Standard cone.
5. Cone in a form of indefinite matrix.
6. 1-sheet hyperboloid.
7. 1-sheet hyperboloid in a form of indefinite matrix.
8. 2-sheet hyperboloid.
9. 2-sheet hyperboloid in a form of indefinite matrix.
10. Standard cylinder.
11. Cylinder in a form of positive-semidefinite matrix.
12. Hyperbolic paraboloid.
13. Elliptic paraboloid.
Current list of combinations of quadric and linear structures:
1. Matrix ellipsoid and line.
2. Standard ellipsoid and plane.
3. Matrix ellipsoid and plane.
4. Matrix cone and line.
5. Standard cone and plane.
6. 1-sheet hyperboloid in matrix form and line.
7. 2-sheet hyperboloid in matrix form and line.
8. Matrix cylinder and line.
9. Elliptic paraboloid and line.
10. Hyperbolic paraboloid and line.
Interactive 3D graphs are provided for all of the above.
Step by step calculation algorithms are provided for all intersection point sets.
Many of the algorithms are based on Linear Algebra concepts. Those, in turn, are explained in our “Matrix Solver Step by Step” app.
Version 10 was completely redesigned.
Developers hope to get feedback from users at graphmath@aol.com.