IPM Popillia Pest Management
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 112 keywords for IPM Popillia Pest Management in Apple App Store
IPM Popillia Pest Management tracks 112 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 111 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.6, difficulty 39.0, best rank 109.
Tracked keywords
112
1 ranked • 111 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 109 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.6
Top keyword: immediately
Avg difficulty
39.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.9
immediately
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 96
- 66.9
practical
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 60
- 64.9
participate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 128
- 68.2
course
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 126
- 67.6
address
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 157
Unranked opportunities
immediately
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 96
practical
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 60
participate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 128
course
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 126
address
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 157
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 182,994 • Major competitors: 3,792
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
help
Total apps: 150,250 • Major competitors: 2,451
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
easily
Total apps: 85,676 • Major competitors: 1,259
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
allows
Total apps: 80,365 • Major competitors: 658
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.9
provides
Total apps: 72,728 • Major competitors: 564
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| species | 71 | 100 | 36 | 58 2,911 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | 115 | 109 | 34 major competitor apps |
| new | 65 | 100 | 56 | 88 182,994 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,792 major competitor apps |
| challenge | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 34,298 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 917 major competitor apps |
| health | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 39,249 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 533 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 41,612 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 716 major competitor apps |
| environment | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 13,648 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 165 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 40,927 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 862 major competitor apps |
| people | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 52,098 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 907 major competitor apps |
| working | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 19,941 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 251 major competitor apps |
| immediately | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,592 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 96 major competitor apps |
| food | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 35,873 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 429 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 150,250 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,451 major competitor apps |
| community | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 43,684 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 594 major competitor apps |
| run | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 22,428 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 499 major competitor apps |
| citizen | 70 | 100 | 31 | 50 968 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 49 | 81 72,728 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 564 major competitor apps |
| tools | 69 | 100 | 48 | 76 36,694 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 596 major competitor apps |
| managing | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 20,137 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 198 major competitor apps |
| practical | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 9,950 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| easily | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 85,676 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,259 major competitor apps |
| goods | 72 | 100 | 37 | 59 3,240 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| participate | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,553 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 128 major competitor apps |
| develop | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 14,694 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 214 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 80,365 competing apps Median installs: 374 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 658 major competitor apps |
| course | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,872 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 126 major competitor apps |
App Description
Prevention of the species’ invasion faces two constraints: The possibilities to restrict the movement of goods and people are limited, and successful eradication of the population established south of the Italian-Suisse border is impossible. With the IPM (Integrated Pest Management) Citizen Science App, the public can contribute sightings of the Japanese Beetle and participate in location monitoring. The App allows recording beetle sightings selection of damaged crops, fruits, vegetables, and other plant species. With your Citizen Science observations for agricultural fields or in your garden and private horticulture, you help the team of IPM Popillia to combat the invasive species and ensure food safety in agriculture in Europe, the US, and beyond.
Recently, EFSA and the JCR of the European commission have nominated P. japonica as a candidate high priority pest in the new EU Plant health Law. Against this background, it is paramount to develop measures that help to confine the spread of the new pest and prevent the build-up of high population densities that cause economic loss to agricultural crops and increase migration pressure of the Japanese beetles.
The project IPM-Popillia develops these measures. It involves teams working in the core of the recent outbreak area, conducting fit-for-purpose practical research in a European environment that can be applied immediately as short-term containment measures. In the longer term, IPM-Popillia provides tools and advice on managing the pest on a larger, European continental scale and how to be better prepared for similar pest invasions in the future.
The interactive App and the user community run on the SPOTTERON Citizen Science platform on www.spotteron.app.