Australian Tropical Ferns
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 110 keywords for Australian Tropical Ferns in Apple App Store
Australian Tropical Ferns tracks 110 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 110 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.1, difficulty 37.1.
Tracked keywords
110
0 ranked • 110 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.1
Top keyword: character
Avg difficulty
37.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.6
character
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 139
- 64.0
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 11
- 67.6
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 45
- 65.8
especially
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 60
- 66.1
constantly
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 80
Unranked opportunities
character
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 139
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 11
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 45
especially
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 60
constantly
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 80
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 185,407 • Major competitors: 2,043
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
help
Total apps: 146,877 • Major competitors: 1,244
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
mobile
Total apps: 117,282 • Major competitors: 771
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
using
Total apps: 116,658 • Major competitors: 765
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
features
Total apps: 113,448 • Major competitors: 1,070
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 65 | 100 | 53 | 88 185,407 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,043 major competitor apps |
| character | 73 | 100 | 41 | 69 12,406 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 139 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 29,193 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 180 major competitor apps |
| environment | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 13,358 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 73 major competitor apps |
| collection | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 29,581 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 278 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 110,448 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 537 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 51,134 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 235 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 116,658 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 765 major competitor apps |
| built | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 28,263 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 142 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 117,282 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 771 major competitor apps |
| key | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 41,571 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 268 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 52 | 87 146,877 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,244 major competitor apps |
| including | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 69,233 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 744 major competitor apps |
| university | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,584 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| update | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 20,093 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 162 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 22,404 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 279 major competitor apps |
| search | 68 | 100 | 48 | 80 55,727 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 521 major competitor apps |
| test | 69 | 100 | 46 | 77 37,695 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 400 major competitor apps |
| complete | 68 | 100 | 49 | 80 63,498 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 635 major competitor apps |
| powered | 71 | 100 | 44 | 74 24,660 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 170 major competitor apps |
| improve | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 45,912 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 334 major competitor apps |
| current | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 67,023 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 728 major competitor apps |
| part | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 29,704 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 215 major competitor apps |
| together | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 21,250 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 211 major competitor apps |
| made | 69 | 100 | 46 | 77 36,910 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 302 major competitor apps |
App Description
Data Observations
This key was built using preserved specimens held in public collection institutions that were carefully dissected, observed, interpreted and the features scored by trained botanists. The majority of observations were made on specimens in the Australian Tropical Herbarium (CNS), with additions from the Queensland Herbarium (BRI). The dataset was augmented with coding from published descriptions including the Flora of Australia, especially for species where no complete herbarium materials were known. The Australasian Virtual Herbarium (AVH - https://avh.ala.org.au/) was used as a basis for distribution descriptions. As distribution information is constantly updated when specimens are reidentified and new specimens are lodged in Australian Herbaria, it is recommended to search the current known distribution of a species in AVH.
Acknowledgements
Australian Tropical Ferns and Lycophytes was developed at the Australian Tropical Herbarium by personnel from CSIRO, James Cook University and the Queensland Herbarium (Queensland Department of Environment and Science). In addition to the authors, the character set was developed and revised with input from John Connors, Peter Bostock and Jim Croft. We thank Andrew Franks, Bruce Gray, Robert Jago, David Jones, Garry Sankowsky and Nada Sankowsky for supplying photographs. The project was supported in part by the Australian Biological Resources Study (ABRS).
This app is powered by Lucid Mobile