Australian Tropical Ferns
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 110 keywords for Australian Tropical Ferns in Apple App Store
Australian Tropical Ferns tracks 110 keywords (2 keywords rank; 108 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.2, difficulty 38.4, best rank 118.
Tracked keywords
110
2 ranked • 108 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 118 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: character
Avg difficulty
38.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.6
character
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 277
- 64.1
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 28
- 68.0
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 95
- 62.0
north
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 98
- 65.2
especially
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 112
Unranked opportunities
character
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Competitors: 277
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 28
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 95
north
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 98
especially
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 112
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 182,347 • Major competitors: 3,800
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.8
help
Total apps: 162,244 • Major competitors: 2,472
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
mobile
Total apps: 130,035 • Major competitors: 1,613
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.2
features
Total apps: 126,027 • Major competitors: 2,126
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
information
Total apps: 121,649 • Major competitors: 1,140
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| australian | 71 | 100 | 34 | 55 1,909 competing apps Median installs: 728 Avg rating: 4.1 | 118 | 118 | 26 major competitor apps |
| tropical | 70 | 100 | 33 | 52 1,309 competing apps Median installs: 1,100 Avg rating: 4.1 | 130 | 130 | 51 major competitor apps |
| new | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 182,347 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,800 major competitor apps |
| character | 73 | 100 | 43 | 69 13,405 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 277 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 30,986 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 384 major competitor apps |
| environment | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 14,847 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 165 major competitor apps |
| collection | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 32,865 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 525 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 121,649 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,140 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 50,542 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 503 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,639 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,562 major competitor apps |
| built | 71 | 100 | 45 | 74 26,973 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 258 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 130,035 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,613 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 49 | 80 62,180 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 543 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 162,244 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,472 major competitor apps |
| including | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 67,617 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,397 major competitor apps |
| university | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,171 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 28 major competitor apps |
| update | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 22,783 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 362 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 24,447 competing apps Median installs: 528 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 478 major competitor apps |
| search | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 61,671 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 979 major competitor apps |
| test | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 42,097 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 714 major competitor apps |
| complete | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 72,748 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,229 major competitor apps |
| powered | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,642 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 304 major competitor apps |
| improve | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 45,049 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 633 major competitor apps |
| current | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 72,988 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,490 major competitor apps |
| part | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 29,306 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 408 major competitor apps |
App Description
Data Observations
This key was built using preserved specimens held in public collection institutions that were carefully dissected, observed, interpreted and the features scored by trained botanists. The majority of observations were made on specimens in the Australian Tropical Herbarium (CNS), with additions from the Queensland Herbarium (BRI). The dataset was augmented with coding from published descriptions including the Flora of Australia, especially for species where no complete herbarium materials were known. The Australasian Virtual Herbarium (AVH - https://avh.ala.org.au/) was used as a basis for distribution descriptions. As distribution information is constantly updated when specimens are reidentified and new specimens are lodged in Australian Herbaria, it is recommended to search the current known distribution of a species in AVH.
Acknowledgements
Australian Tropical Ferns and Lycophytes was developed at the Australian Tropical Herbarium by personnel from CSIRO, James Cook University and the Queensland Herbarium (Queensland Department of Environment and Science). In addition to the authors, the character set was developed and revised with input from John Connors, Peter Bostock and Jim Croft. We thank Andrew Franks, Bruce Gray, Robert Jago, David Jones, Garry Sankowsky and Nada Sankowsky for supplying photographs. The project was supported in part by the Australian Biological Resources Study (ABRS).
This app is powered by Lucid Mobile