Australian Tropical Ferns
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 110 keywords for Australian Tropical Ferns in Apple App Store
Australian Tropical Ferns tracks 110 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 110 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 47.7, difficulty 36.6.
Tracked keywords
110
0 ranked • 110 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
47.7
Top keyword: new
Avg difficulty
36.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 91.1
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 2,341
- 85.2
help
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,236
- 83.9
features
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,060
- 83.2
unique
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,009
- 65.1
character
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 135
Unranked opportunities
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Competitors: 2,341
help
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Competitors: 1,236
features
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Competitors: 1,060
unique
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.5 • Competitors: 1,009
character
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Competitors: 135
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 10,701 • Major competitors: 2,341
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.9
help
Total apps: 5,873 • Major competitors: 1,236
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.1
features
Total apps: 5,134 • Major competitors: 1,060
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.4
unique
Total apps: 4,782 • Major competitors: 1,009
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
using
Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 59 | 100 | 64 | 91 10,701 competing apps Median installs: 270,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2,341 major competitor apps |
| character | 58 | 100 | 44 | 65 753 competing apps Median installs: 240,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 135 major competitor apps |
| version | 58 | 100 | 46 | 68 1,006 competing apps Median installs: 238,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 182 major competitor apps |
| environment | 57 | 100 | 38 | 59 397 competing apps Median installs: 218,075 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 63 major competitor apps |
| collection | 58 | 100 | 48 | 70 1,259 competing apps Median installs: 268,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 276 major competitor apps |
| information | 58 | 100 | 57 | 78 2,704 competing apps Median installs: 252,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 572 major competitor apps |
| used | 58 | 100 | 53 | 72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 279 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| built | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 855 competing apps Median installs: 239,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 175 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 58 | 100 | 60 | 81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 846 major competitor apps |
| key | 58 | 100 | 51 | 69 1,089 competing apps Median installs: 257,575 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 226 major competitor apps |
| help | 59 | 100 | 61 | 85 5,873 competing apps Median installs: 257,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,236 major competitor apps |
| including | 58 | 100 | 62 | 81 3,880 competing apps Median installs: 285,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 926 major competitor apps |
| university | 57 | 100 | 31 | 41 67 competing apps Median installs: 211,800 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| update | 58 | 100 | 47 | 65 767 competing apps Median installs: 272,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 168 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 58 | 100 | 53 | 69 1,101 competing apps Median installs: 270,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
| search | 58 | 100 | 62 | 75 2,154 competing apps Median installs: 273,038 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 531 major competitor apps |
| test | 58 | 100 | 50 | 73 1,727 competing apps Median installs: 258,500 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 389 major competitor apps |
| complete | 58 | 100 | 52 | 78 2,946 competing apps Median installs: 253,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 625 major competitor apps |
| powered | 58 | 100 | 51 | 67 897 competing apps Median installs: 294,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 216 major competitor apps |
| improve | 58 | 100 | 50 | 74 1,897 competing apps Median installs: 240,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 379 major competitor apps |
| current | 58 | 100 | 56 | 81 3,863 competing apps Median installs: 255,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 756 major competitor apps |
| part | 58 | 100 | 54 | 69 1,154 competing apps Median installs: 268,538 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 247 major competitor apps |
| together | 58 | 100 | 53 | 69 1,115 competing apps Median installs: 261,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 249 major competitor apps |
| made | 58 | 100 | 55 | 73 1,627 competing apps Median installs: 257,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 361 major competitor apps |
App Description
Data Observations
This key was built using preserved specimens held in public collection institutions that were carefully dissected, observed, interpreted and the features scored by trained botanists. The majority of observations were made on specimens in the Australian Tropical Herbarium (CNS), with additions from the Queensland Herbarium (BRI). The dataset was augmented with coding from published descriptions including the Flora of Australia, especially for species where no complete herbarium materials were known. The Australasian Virtual Herbarium (AVH - https://avh.ala.org.au/) was used as a basis for distribution descriptions. As distribution information is constantly updated when specimens are reidentified and new specimens are lodged in Australian Herbaria, it is recommended to search the current known distribution of a species in AVH.
Acknowledgements
Australian Tropical Ferns and Lycophytes was developed at the Australian Tropical Herbarium by personnel from CSIRO, James Cook University and the Queensland Herbarium (Queensland Department of Environment and Science). In addition to the authors, the character set was developed and revised with input from John Connors, Peter Bostock and Jim Croft. We thank Andrew Franks, Bruce Gray, Robert Jago, David Jones, Garry Sankowsky and Nada Sankowsky for supplying photographs. The project was supported in part by the Australian Biological Resources Study (ABRS).
This app is powered by Lucid Mobile