OxMET

Developer: University of Oxford

Category: Medical

~50 - 100

1 ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 50 keywords for OxMET in Apple App Store

Developer: University of Oxford Category: medical Rating: 1

OxMET tracks 50 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 50 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 47.9, difficulty 39.3.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 50 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

47.9

Top keyword: account

Avg difficulty

39.3

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

account

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,073
84.1
health

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 307
70.9
information

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 572
77.6
used

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 279
71.8
using

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 61.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 924
82.6

Unranked opportunities

account

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Competitors: 1,073
health

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Competitors: 307
information

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.9 • Competitors: 572
used

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Competitors: 279
using

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 61.4 • Competitors: 924

High competition keywords

account

Total apps: 5,212 • Major competitors: 1,073

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
using

Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
automatically

Total apps: 4,092 • Major competitors: 815

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.8
information

Total apps: 2,704 • Major competitors: 572

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.9
provides

Total apps: 1,846 • Major competitors: 308

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.1

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
health	58	100	51	71 1,361 competing apps Median installs: 248,675 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	307 major competitor apps
shopping	20	100	62	66 792 competing apps Median installs: 328,762 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	246 major competitor apps
information	58	100	57	78 2,704 competing apps Median installs: 252,888 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	572 major competitor apps
used	58	100	53	72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	279 major competitor apps
using	58	100	61	83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	924 major competitor apps
age	58	100	41	61 474 competing apps Median installs: 229,175 Avg rating: 4.5	—	—	88 major competitor apps
account	59	100	61	84 5,212 competing apps Median installs: 257,662 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,073 major competitor apps
university	57	100	31	41 67 competing apps Median installs: 211,800 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	11 major competitor apps
group	58	100	60	64 695 competing apps Median installs: 244,600 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	151 major competitor apps
contained	56	100	23	34 31 competing apps Median installs: 193,700 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	5 major competitor apps
test	58	100	50	73 1,727 competing apps Median installs: 258,500 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	389 major competitor apps
provides	58	100	49	74 1,846 competing apps Median installs: 221,075 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	308 major competitor apps
tool	58	100	47	69 1,134 competing apps Median installs: 210,275 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	170 major competitor apps
visual	58	100	44	65 769 competing apps Median installs: 223,725 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	133 major competitor apps
suitable	58	100	41	61 522 competing apps Median installs: 225,925 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	83 major competitor apps
upon	58	100	41	62 570 competing apps Median installs: 215,925 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	98 major competitor apps
professionals	57	100	37	53 227 competing apps Median installs: 245,750 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	42 major competitor apps
screen	58	100	55	73 1,748 competing apps Median installs: 253,888 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	360 major competitor apps
generated	57	100	42	56 295 competing apps Median installs: 242,550 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	46 major competitor apps
assessment	20	100	34	40 56 competing apps Median installs: 493,512 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	18 major competitor apps
report	58	100	49	59 425 competing apps Median installs: 306,950 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	92 major competitor apps
stored	57	100	39	57 320 competing apps Median installs: 239,762 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	52 major competitor apps
al	57	100	32	48 131 competing apps Median installs: 218,075 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	18 major competitor apps
research	57	100	41	56 285 competing apps Median installs: 233,400 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	48 major competitor apps
developed	58	100	41	60 460 competing apps Median installs: 233,638 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	74 major competitor apps

App Description

OxMET was developed by the Translational Neuropsychology Research Group at the University of Oxford. The OxMET cognitive screen has been standardised, normed and validated (Webb et al 2021, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation). OxMET is suitable for use with adults, and in chronic (greater 6-month post-stoke) and subacute (greater 3 months post-stroke).

The tool is not for self-assessment. Instead, OxMET provides health professionals with a brief, ecologically valid, assessment of executive dysfunction using a naturalistic shopping scenario. The test is automatically scored and evaluated against age adjusted norms (three age groups; under 64, between 64 and 72, and over 72). Upon completion, a visual snapshot report is automatically generated and can be stored locally on the device. The information contained in the report is not in itself a clinical diagnosis. The report should be used to inform a clinical diagnosis that takes into account all relevant clinical factors.