OxMET

Developer: University of Oxford

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

~50 - 100

1.00 ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 50 keywords for OxMET in Apple App Store

Developer: University of Oxford Category: medical Rating: 1

OxMET tracks 50 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 50 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.4, difficulty 38.7.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 50 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.4

Top keyword: age

Avg difficulty

38.7

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

age

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 118
66.3
university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 12
64.0
upon

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 103
67.5
professionals

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 40
68.7
generated

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 51
67.4

Unranked opportunities

age

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 118
university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 12
upon

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 103
professionals

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 40
generated

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 51

High competition keywords

using

Total apps: 115,727 • Major competitors: 957

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
information

Total apps: 111,898 • Major competitors: 689

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
account

Total apps: 80,984 • Major competitors: 1,305

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.1
provides

Total apps: 73,026 • Major competitors: 321

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.0
automatically

Total apps: 62,712 • Major competitors: 850

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.7

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
health	69	100	47	77 39,002 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	353 major competitor apps
shopping	72	100	44	71 17,561 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	274 major competitor apps
information	66	100	51	85 111,898 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	689 major competitor apps
used	68	100	48	79 50,838 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	307 major competitor apps
using	66	100	51	85 115,727 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	957 major competitor apps
age	73	100	40	66 9,179 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	118 major competitor apps
account	67	100	50	82 80,984 competing apps Median installs: 225 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,305 major competitor apps
university	73	100	39	64 6,659 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	12 major competitor apps
group	71	100	45	73 23,336 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	196 major competitor apps
contained	70	100	32	53 1,444 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	4 major competitor apps
test	69	100	46	77 38,413 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	460 major competitor apps
provides	67	100	49	81 73,026 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	321 major competitor apps
tool	69	100	47	78 48,311 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	215 major competitor apps
visual	71	100	44	73 24,075 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	187 major competitor apps
suitable	72	100	42	69 13,604 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	116 major competitor apps
upon	73	100	41	68 10,847 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	103 major competitor apps
professionals	73	100	41	69 12,761 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	40 major competitor apps
screen	69	100	47	77 42,174 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	445 major competitor apps
generated	73	100	41	67 10,585 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	51 major competitor apps
assessment	72	100	36	59 3,534 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	21 major competitor apps
report	72	100	42	70 14,686 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	116 major competitor apps
stored	73	100	41	68 12,041 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	56 major competitor apps
al	72	100	37	62 4,867 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	22 major competitor apps
research	73	100	40	67 9,945 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	61 major competitor apps
developed	71	100	44	72 21,412 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	86 major competitor apps

App Description

OxMET was developed by the Translational Neuropsychology Research Group at the University of Oxford. The OxMET cognitive screen has been standardised, normed and validated (Webb et al 2021, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation). OxMET is suitable for use with adults, and in chronic (greater 6-month post-stoke) and subacute (greater 3 months post-stroke).

The tool is not for self-assessment. Instead, OxMET provides health professionals with a brief, ecologically valid, assessment of executive dysfunction using a naturalistic shopping scenario. The test is automatically scored and evaluated against age adjusted norms (three age groups; under 64, between 64 and 72, and over 72). Upon completion, a visual snapshot report is automatically generated and can be stored locally on the device. The information contained in the report is not in itself a clinical diagnosis. The report should be used to inform a clinical diagnosis that takes into account all relevant clinical factors.