OxMET

Developer: University of Oxford

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

50 installs

1.00 ratings

4.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 50 keywords for OxMET in Apple App Store

Developer: University of Oxford Category: medical Rating: 1

OxMET tracks 50 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 50 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.6, difficulty 39.7.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 50 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.6

Top keyword: age

Avg difficulty

39.7

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

age

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 270
66.4
university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 39
64.1
upon

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 256
67.0
professionals

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 86
68.2
generated

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 142
66.8

Unranked opportunities

age

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 270
university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 39
upon

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 256
professionals

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 86
generated

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 142

High competition keywords

information

Total apps: 121,675 • Major competitors: 1,488

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.2
using

Total apps: 114,483 • Major competitors: 2,227

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
account

Total apps: 87,130 • Major competitors: 2,901

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.6
provides

Total apps: 72,456 • Major competitors: 812

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.1
automatically

Total apps: 61,753 • Major competitors: 2,022

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.4

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
health	69	100	48	77 43,601 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	725 major competitor apps
shopping	71	100	48	71 19,941 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	523 major competitor apps
information	66	100	52	85 121,675 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,488 major competitor apps
used	69	100	48	78 50,473 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	700 major competitor apps
using	66	100	53	84 114,483 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,227 major competitor apps
age	73	100	43	66 9,916 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	270 major competitor apps
account	67	100	53	82 87,130 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,901 major competitor apps
university	73	100	40	64 7,176 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	39 major competitor apps
group	71	100	49	73 25,669 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	424 major competitor apps
contained	71	100	32	53 1,439 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	11 major competitor apps
test	69	100	48	77 42,137 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	963 major competitor apps
provides	68	100	49	81 72,456 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	812 major competitor apps
tool	69	100	48	79 53,520 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	554 major competitor apps
visual	70	100	45	74 27,919 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	468 major competitor apps
suitable	72	100	43	69 14,781 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	314 major competitor apps
upon	73	100	41	67 10,718 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	256 major competitor apps
professionals	73	100	41	68 12,628 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	86 major competitor apps
screen	69	100	50	77 45,360 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,078 major competitor apps
generated	73	100	41	67 10,431 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	142 major competitor apps
assessment	72	100	37	60 3,978 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	36 major competitor apps
report	72	100	44	70 16,045 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	239 major competitor apps
stored	73	100	42	68 11,918 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	140 major competitor apps
al	73	100	39	62 5,566 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	80 major competitor apps
research	73	100	42	67 10,939 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	154 major competitor apps
developed	71	100	44	72 21,240 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	212 major competitor apps

App Description

OxMET was developed by the Translational Neuropsychology Research Group at the University of Oxford. The OxMET cognitive screen has been standardised, normed and validated (Webb et al 2021, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation). OxMET is suitable for use with adults, and in chronic (greater 6-month post-stoke) and subacute (greater 3 months post-stroke).

The tool is not for self-assessment. Instead, OxMET provides health professionals with a brief, ecologically valid, assessment of executive dysfunction using a naturalistic shopping scenario. The test is automatically scored and evaluated against age adjusted norms (three age groups; under 64, between 64 and 72, and over 72). Upon completion, a visual snapshot report is automatically generated and can be stored locally on the device. The information contained in the report is not in itself a clinical diagnosis. The report should be used to inform a clinical diagnosis that takes into account all relevant clinical factors.