Photo finish app
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 105 keywords for Photo finish app in Apple App Store
Photo finish app tracks 105 keywords (2 keywords rank; 103 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.8, difficulty 39.6, best rank 16.
Tracked keywords
105
2 ranked • 103 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 16 • Latest leader 19
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: finish
Avg difficulty
39.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.1
finish
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank 19
Competitors: 220
- 68.4
setting
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 206
- 64.8
combine
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 215
- 66.1
race
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 225
- 67.0
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 176
Unranked opportunities
setting
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 206
combine
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Competitors: 215
race
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 225
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 176
approach
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.5 • Competitors: 94
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 189,826 • Major competitors: 2,979
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
available
Total apps: 95,749 • Major competitors: 1,852
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
save
Total apps: 93,518 • Major competitors: 1,629
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.0
right
Total apps: 89,990 • Major competitors: 1,646
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
us
Total apps: 80,334 • Major competitors: 1,546
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| finish | 73 | 100 | 42 | 65 8,177 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | 19 | 16 | 220 major competitor apps |
| finished | 71 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,694 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | 122 | 122 | 29 major competitor apps |
| top | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 46,680 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,080 major competitor apps |
| right | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 89,990 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,646 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 41,440 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 713 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 67,142 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,305 major competitor apps |
| setting | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 12,964 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 206 major competitor apps |
| image | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 27,954 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 304 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 93,518 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,629 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 189,826 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,979 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 95,749 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,852 major competitor apps |
| width | 70 | 100 | 30 | 49 916 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| event | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 29,853 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 194 major competitor apps |
| combine | 73 | 100 | 42 | 65 7,928 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 215 major competitor apps |
| photos | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 37,937 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 634 major competitor apps |
| picture | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 20,618 competing apps Median installs: 589 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 316 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 28,421 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 515 major competitor apps |
| technique | 72 | 100 | 35 | 58 3,088 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| race | 73 | 100 | 42 | 66 9,458 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 225 major competitor apps |
| provides | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 72,516 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 568 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,731 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 176 major competitor apps |
| approach | 73 | 100 | 46 | 67 11,019 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 94 major competitor apps |
| winner | 71 | 100 | 39 | 57 2,652 competing apps Median installs: 1,150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 80 major competitor apps |
| winners | 69 | 100 | 29 | 46 608 competing apps Median installs: 1,100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| balance | 72 | 100 | 45 | 69 14,924 competing apps Median installs: 1,200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 307 major competitor apps |
App Description
The photo-finish application enables you to measure finish time with a precision of 0.004 seconds, identify the race winner, and save a picture as evidence of the winner and results.
The app captures a sequence of slit photos of the finish line, with each photo frame featuring a timestamp indicating a precise time. When the frame shows the crossing of the finish line, the timestamp of that specific frame serves as the defining finish time.
Instructions:
1. Position the camera to capture the finish line within the frame borders.
2. Initiate the stopwatch at the beginning of the race.
3. Commence recording as the winning participant nears the finish line.
4. Cease recording once the athlete has crossed the finish line.
5. Identify the frame capturing the winner crossing the finish line; the timestamp at the cursor line indicates the precise result.
Direction:
The application employs the slit-photo technique, merging a sequence of frames into a chronological resulting image. The top scale on the resulting image provides an approximate timeline.
Depending on the winner's approach to the finish line, it is advisable to combine frames in either "left to right" or "right to left" order. For instance, if the camera is positioned inside the stadium track, the direction should be "right to left"; if outside, then "left to right" would be appropriate.
Frame width.
The frame width setting is contingent upon the distance between the camera and the track, as well as the speed of the athlete. If the camera is too close or the winner's speed is high, there's a risk of the winner crossing the frame sector too rapidly, potentially compromising the clarity of the image. Therefore, it is advisable to increase the frame width.
However, it's essential to consider that the size of the resulting image is constrained. If the frame width is excessively wide, it may limit the time available to record the winner's result. Striking a balance between frame width and image size is crucial for optimal performance.us it is better to increase the image width. From another point, the size of the resulting image is limited. If the frame is too wide then you will have less time to record the winner result.
Precision Note:
T