External Weighing Display
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 35 keywords for External Weighing Display in Apple App Store
External Weighing Display tracks 35 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 34 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.8, difficulty 38.8, best rank 126.
Tracked keywords
35
1 ranked • 34 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 126 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: second
Avg difficulty
38.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.8
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 155
- 67.2
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 109
- 64.5
tablet
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 98
- 67.1
weight
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 161
- 68.1
industry
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 106
Unranked opportunities
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 155
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 109
tablet
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 98
weight
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 161
industry
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 106
High competition keywords
using
Total apps: 115,243 • Major competitors: 1,470
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
view
Total apps: 97,508 • Major competitors: 1,225
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
please
Total apps: 56,437 • Major competitors: 940
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.5
smart
Total apps: 49,261 • Major competitors: 741
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.3
show
Total apps: 36,347 • Major competitors: 673
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| display | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 21,942 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.0 | 137 | 126 | 196 major competitor apps |
| networking | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,508 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 30 major competitor apps |
| flexibility | 72 | 100 | 38 | 63 5,589 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 81 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 115,243 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,470 major competitor apps |
| legal | 72 | 100 | 38 | 61 4,727 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 55 major competitor apps |
| monitor | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 29,333 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 344 major competitor apps |
| smart | 69 | 100 | 48 | 79 49,261 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 741 major competitor apps |
| view | 67 | 100 | 51 | 83 97,508 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,225 major competitor apps |
| second | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 11,296 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 155 major competitor apps |
| needed | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,346 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 109 major competitor apps |
| please | 68 | 100 | 48 | 80 56,437 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 940 major competitor apps |
| tablet | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,151 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 98 major competitor apps |
| balance | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 13,749 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 290 major competitor apps |
| weight | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,241 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 161 major competitor apps |
| show | 69 | 100 | 47 | 76 36,347 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 673 major competitor apps |
| standard | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 15,787 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 212 major competitor apps |
| context | 72 | 100 | 37 | 60 3,686 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| person | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 13,543 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 235 major competitor apps |
| ip | 72 | 100 | 37 | 59 3,377 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 65 major competitor apps |
| owner | 72 | 100 | 36 | 59 3,511 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 48 major competitor apps |
| industry | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,665 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 106 major competitor apps |
| values | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 7,014 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 34 major competitor apps |
| supports | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 26,083 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 280 major competitor apps |
| hardware | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,562 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 40 major competitor apps |
| shown | 73 | 100 | 39 | 63 6,106 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 75 major competitor apps |
App Description
Use cases are more flexibility to view the weight values when the balance resides In a cabin, to show a second person the weight values or to monitor weight values remotely when in the lab.
A hardware balance is needed that supports TCP/IP networking and the industry standard MT-SICS protocol. Please refer to your balance's owner manual.
DISCLAIMER: There is no warranty on any correctness of the shown weight values, in particular in the legal context of using an approved balance.