Inclusion Atlas
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 153 keywords for Inclusion Atlas in Apple App Store
Inclusion Atlas tracks 153 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 153 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.4, difficulty 39.4.
Tracked keywords
153
0 ranked • 153 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.4
Top keyword: age
Avg difficulty
39.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.4
age
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 269
- 63.1
cultural
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 63
- 68.0
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 138
- 66.8
generated
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 142
- 62.4
engagement
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 46
Unranked opportunities
age
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 269
cultural
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.8 • Competitors: 63
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 138
generated
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 142
engagement
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.8 • Competitors: 46
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 181,337 • Major competitors: 3,505
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.8
mobile
Total apps: 130,143 • Major competitors: 2,092
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
information
Total apps: 121,671 • Major competitors: 1,489
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.2
way
Total apps: 115,848 • Major competitors: 2,693
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.9
different
Total apps: 100,114 • Major competitors: 2,531
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| customer | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 32,092 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 583 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 56,472 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,102 major competitor apps |
| environment | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 14,852 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 228 major competitor apps |
| users | 68 | 100 | 49 | 79 60,374 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 956 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 41,537 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 837 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 121,671 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,489 major competitor apps |
| needs | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 25,896 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 459 major competitor apps |
| limited | 72 | 100 | 47 | 70 16,163 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 457 major competitor apps |
| people | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 56,433 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,267 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 115,848 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,693 major competitor apps |
| age | 73 | 100 | 43 | 66 9,922 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 269 major competitor apps |
| service | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 61,223 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,170 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 95,836 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,473 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 130,143 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,092 major competitor apps |
| rate | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 21,544 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 425 major competitor apps |
| collected | 72 | 100 | 38 | 61 4,398 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 56 major competitor apps |
| photos | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 37,810 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 936 major competitor apps |
| useful information | 70 | 100 | 31 | 52 1,284 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 12 major competitor apps |
| explore | 68 | 100 | 53 | 80 68,051 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,939 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 181,337 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 3,505 major competitor apps |
| community | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 48,535 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 810 major competitor apps |
| market | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 16,057 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 302 major competitor apps |
| customers | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,568 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 362 major competitor apps |
| related | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 22,224 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 307 major competitor apps |
| many | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 76,730 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,910 major competitor apps |
App Description
Currently, people living with disability often struggle with physical access to a range of services, buildings, and transportation, with little information readily available regarding the standard of accessibility of these spaces. To combat this issue, Inclusion Atlas utilises User Generated Content. Our platform involves users through voting and rating systems, uploading photos of venues and other voluntary micro-tasks, gamified with a detailed scoring system, unlocking achievements and user badges to encourage participants. User-generated reviews and ratings are collected and collated into a database, wherein customers can explore local businesses, public spaces, infrastructure and greenspaces with the knowledge that their contributions and concerns have been recognised and accounted for.
The interests of communities are at the forefront of all decisions related to the development of Inclusion Atlas. The platform sets itself apart from other inclusivity-based applications on the market as it supports a wider range of individuals, alongside those living with disability. Our platform caters to many different community groups who are often marginalised and socially excluded. These include, but are not limited to the LGBTQIA+ community, people of diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds and people of diverse age groups.
Unlike other popular venue reviewing sites, business owners are not publicly shamed or coerced into change. Instead, venue owners are guided by direct feedback from their clientele and communities to collaborate and communicate in such a way to bring about solutions that fulfil the needs and necessities of all users. The idea for this project was sparked by Cultural Infusion’s Junior Project Manager, Saman Akbaryan, who is an IT Masters graduate and wheelchair user himself. Saman has experienced the difficulties faced by marg