Compact DeLuxe

350 installs
7.00 ratings
27 monthly active users
Revenue not available
Compact DeLuxe icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 110 keywords for Compact DeLuxe in Apple App Store

Developer: Genuine Soundware Category: music_and_audio Rating: 4.86

Compact DeLuxe tracks 110 keywords (3 keywords rank; 107 need traction). Key metrics: 33% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.6, difficulty 38.9, best rank 6.

Tracked keywords

110

3  ranked •  107  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

33%

Best rank 6 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.6

Top keyword: external

Avg difficulty

38.9

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • external

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —

    Competitors: 94

    64.5
  • course

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —

    Competitors: 128

    68.2
  • generator

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank —

    Competitors: 74

    62.6
  • coming

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.7 • Rank —

    Competitors: 222

    68.3
  • generation

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —

    Competitors: 109

    65.9

Unranked opportunities

  • external

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 94

  • course

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 128

  • generator

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Competitors: 74

  • coming

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.7 • Competitors: 222

  • generation

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 109

High competition keywords

  • like

    Total apps: 153,385 • Major competitors: 3,284

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.4

  • best

    Total apps: 124,586 • Major competitors: 2,642

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9

  • using

    Total apps: 114,639 • Major competitors: 1,562

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1

  • different

    Total apps: 100,117 • Major competitors: 1,707

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3

  • see

    Total apps: 92,680 • Major competitors: 1,758

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.2

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
compact701003352

1,354 competing apps

Median installs: 550

Avg rating: 4.0

66

17

major competitor apps

immersive sound691002845

534 competing apps

Median installs: 450

Avg rating: 4.0

8989

11

major competitor apps

realistic sound691002845

515 competing apps

Median installs: 650

Avg rating: 3.8

9292

9

major competitor apps

best661005485

124,586 competing apps

Median installs: 550

Avg rating: 4.1

2,642

major competitor apps

top691005078

46,690 competing apps

Median installs: 550

Avg rating: 4.2

1,080

major competitor apps

level681005079

55,867 competing apps

Median installs: 550

Avg rating: 4.1

1,185

major competitor apps

reason711003656

2,354 competing apps

Median installs: 550

Avg rating: 4.1

38

major competitor apps

external731004165

7,623 competing apps

Median installs: 600

Avg rating: 4.0

94

major competitor apps

section721004269

14,184 competing apps

Median installs: 300

Avg rating: 4.0

120

major competitor apps

used691004978

50,542 competing apps

Median installs: 350

Avg rating: 4.0

503

major competitor apps

using661005384

114,639 competing apps

Median installs: 450

Avg rating: 4.0

1,562

major competitor apps

basic721004471

18,966 competing apps

Median installs: 400

Avg rating: 4.0

194

major competitor apps

note721004570

16,115 competing apps

Median installs: 550

Avg rating: 4.0

262

major competitor apps

various691004878

48,723 competing apps

Median installs: 500

Avg rating: 4.1

729

major competitor apps

technique721003558

3,089 competing apps

Median installs: 400

Avg rating: 4.1

16

major competitor apps

run711004673

24,002 competing apps

Median installs: 550

Avg rating: 4.1

501

major competitor apps

many681005081

76,885 competing apps

Median installs: 500

Avg rating: 4.1

1,358

major competitor apps

pretty721003758

2,979 competing apps

Median installs: 700

Avg rating: 4.1

67

major competitor apps

type711004573

25,638 competing apps

Median installs: 450

Avg rating: 4.0

292

major competitor apps

scene721003861

4,742 competing apps

Median installs: 550

Avg rating: 4.0

60

major competitor apps

like661005586

153,385 competing apps

Median installs: 600

Avg rating: 4.1

3,284

major competitor apps

see671005483

92,680 competing apps

Median installs: 500

Avg rating: 4.1

1,758

major competitor apps

course731004268

12,658 competing apps

Median installs: 350

Avg rating: 4.0

128

major competitor apps

pass721004569

15,105 competing apps

Median installs: 750

Avg rating: 4.1

344

major competitor apps

generator731003963

5,803 competing apps

Median installs: 700

Avg rating: 4.0

74

major competitor apps

110 keywords
1 of 5

App Description

Please note: This App comes with an AUv3 plugin extension.

GSi Compact DeLuxe is a component modeling emulation of a Farfisa Compact DeLuxe.

INSTRUMENT BACKGROUND

Among the many transistor organs of the past, also known as "Combo Organs" (mostly because some of them also had a rhythm section and built-in speakers), the Farfisa Compact DeLuxe, along with its big brother the Compact Duo, was one of the most used organs at least in the european beat scene of the early and mid seventies. The electronic circuit of this kind of organ is relatively simple, at least on paper: rather than using a mechanical tone generator like the tonewheel models (Hammond and Pari), the transistor organs used a circuit called "Top Octave Synthesizer", TOS for short, responsible of the generation of 12 waveforms, one for each note of the last octave of the organ keyboard. The basic waveform was usually something halfway between a ramp and a triangular. The lower octaves were produced by means of "divider" circuits that could halve the frequency of each waveform, going so forth for each lower octave down to the pedalboard tones. At each division, something was lost and something was gained in terms of harmonic content. The result was that the same notes of different octaves had oscillators perfectly in sync, so all C notes were in sync, all C#, all D and so on. This same technique was also used in so-called "string machines" or "stringer keyboards" that emulated orchestral sounds (violins, trumpets, etc.) - see GSi's Electrorchestra.

The various registers in combo organs were produced by passing the raw waveforms through a filter bank, so some waveforms were low-pass filtered for bass-like sounds, some were high-pass filtered for violin-like sounds, etc. and some waveforms also went through more than one filter. This also adds some level of phase shifting between waveforms coming from different registers, the reason why the sum between, e.g. a Flute 8' and a Violin 8' isn't exactly the superimposition of the two waveforms, but something slightly different. And this is one of those underrated details that made the sound of some Combo Organs pretty unique.

The sound engine of GSi Compact DeLuxe is also included in the GSi Gemini as well as in the Crumar Mojo 61.

Of course this type of instrument gives its best if run through external effects and amps. Have a look at the GSi catalo