Football Cup Simulator
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 49 keywords for Football Cup Simulator in Apple App Store
Football Cup Simulator tracks 49 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 48 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.0, difficulty 41.4, best rank 44.
Tracked keywords
49
1 ranked • 48 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 44 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.0
Top keyword: fantasy
Avg difficulty
41.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 62.1
fantasy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 158
- 64.6
choosing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 132
- 65.3
combination
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 147
- 66.2
format
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 99
- 64.2
stage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 97
Unranked opportunities
fantasy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Competitors: 158
choosing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 132
combination
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 147
format
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 99
stage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 97
High competition keywords
like
Total apps: 153,385 • Major competitors: 3,284
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.4
way
Total apps: 115,758 • Major competitors: 1,943
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
world
Total apps: 91,946 • Major competitors: 1,984
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.8
current
Total apps: 72,988 • Major competitors: 1,490
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
build
Total apps: 57,949 • Major competitors: 1,217
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| world cup | 69 | 100 | 32 | 42 345 competing apps Median installs: 900 Avg rating: 3.9 | 44 | 44 | 10 major competitor apps |
| fantasy | 73 | 100 | 39 | 62 5,412 competing apps Median installs: 1,550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 158 major competitor apps |
| choosing | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,722 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 132 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 115,758 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,943 major competitor apps |
| exciting | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 35,445 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 967 major competitor apps |
| combination | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 8,446 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 147 major competitor apps |
| group | 71 | 100 | 50 | 73 25,646 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 311 major competitor apps |
| format | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 9,587 competing apps Median installs: 480 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 99 major competitor apps |
| stage | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,257 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 97 major competitor apps |
| current | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 72,988 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,490 major competitor apps |
| like | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 153,385 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,284 major competitor apps |
| winner | 71 | 100 | 39 | 57 2,653 competing apps Median installs: 1,150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 80 major competitor apps |
| year | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 19,247 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 395 major competitor apps |
| case | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 11,132 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 125 major competitor apps |
| bit | 73 | 100 | 40 | 63 6,128 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 101 major competitor apps |
| probability | 70 | 100 | 31 | 51 1,095 competing apps Median installs: 532 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| world | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 91,946 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,984 major competitor apps |
| global | 71 | 100 | 49 | 74 26,669 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 510 major competitor apps |
| build | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 57,949 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,217 major competitor apps |
| old | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 16,457 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 315 major competitor apps |
| phase | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,210 competing apps Median installs: 477 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 34 major competitor apps |
| look | 69 | 100 | 49 | 76 39,702 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 767 major competitor apps |
| round | 73 | 100 | 41 | 63 6,537 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 123 major competitor apps |
| turn | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 50,550 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,166 major competitor apps |
| certain | 73 | 100 | 44 | 67 10,275 competing apps Median installs: 1,000 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 188 major competitor apps |
App Description
Simulate it, several times if needed and come to your own conclusion of how exciting or boring it could be :-)
Football tournament simulator allows you to build your own fantasy tournament format by selecting from various parameters
1. Number of teams
2. Tournament format
3. Number of groups
4. Number of groups in the 2nd stage (if the format supports it) and their structure.
5. The first Knock out phase in the tournament
Could preselect a format from a previous year of the cup or from the one decided for the 2026 one.
Uses the confederation limits which were in place/proposed for each of the specific tournament templates selected. If you don’t like these limits you could turn them off, in which case the teams will be chosen based on a global world ranking.
Don’t like any of the previous year templates, then build your own exciting tournament. The model will correct you and give you suggestions/explainations during configuration if the combination of parameters you are choosing defies the math :-)
The model uses the current rankings of the teams (i.e. November 2025) in determining the teams that qualify and the draw. Also uses these as probability when deciding on the results of a game.
Supports various tournament formats that occurred previously between 1930-2022
1. Groups followed by knock out stages, the one you have got used to and thought that's the only one used, if you are not old enough :-)
2. Groups followed by a 2nd stage of groups and then a much more reduced knock out stage. This is my particular favourite. Partially too because that's the way it was when I started following.
3. Only knockouts. Ah! Something used almost a century ago, has a certain bit of excitement to it.
4. Group followed by a Finals group, no knockouts. Winner is winner of the finals group.
5. Finals Group. This one has not actually been used but added as other tournaments have used this
Have even thrown in some options which have never been used in any world cup tournament E.g.
* 64 teams
* Various number of round 1 groups
* A Round of 64 as the first knock out phase
* Finals group format
Happy Tournament building!!