Prove It: Unusual Crimes
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 50 keywords for Prove It: Unusual Crimes in Apple App Store
Prove It: Unusual Crimes tracks 50 keywords (2 keywords rank; 48 need traction). Key metrics: 50% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.7, difficulty 38.7, best rank 9.
Tracked keywords
50
2 ranked • 48 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
50%
Best rank 9 • Latest leader 15
Avg opportunity
70.7
Top keyword: prove
Avg difficulty
38.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 62.8
prove
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Rank 15
Competitors: 182
- 67.9
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 168
- 67.1
chance
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 337
- 63.4
round
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 123
- 64.8
teams
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 142
Unranked opportunities
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 168
chance
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Competitors: 337
round
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 123
teams
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 142
played
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.4 • Competitors: 163
High competition keywords
many
Total apps: 76,885 • Major competitors: 1,358
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.3
end
Total apps: 57,766 • Major competitors: 1,403
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
first
Total apps: 56,068 • Major competitors: 908
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.2
number
Total apps: 47,458 • Major competitors: 713
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.8
team
Total apps: 44,996 • Major competitors: 871
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| unusual | 71 | 100 | 35 | 54 1,683 competing apps Median installs: 1,000 Avg rating: 4.1 | 9 | 9 | 33 major competitor apps |
| prove | 73 | 100 | 44 | 63 5,945 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.1 | 15 | 15 | 182 major competitor apps |
| party | 72 | 100 | 45 | 69 14,610 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 358 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 44,996 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 871 major competitor apps |
| apple | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 44,746 competing apps Median installs: 789 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,181 major competitor apps |
| write | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 16,690 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 213 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,635 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 438 major competitor apps |
| academy | 72 | 100 | 36 | 59 3,487 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 23 major competitor apps |
| minimum | 72 | 100 | 41 | 60 4,115 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 94 major competitor apps |
| hand | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 14,024 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 245 major competitor apps |
| many | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 76,885 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,358 major competitor apps |
| second | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 12,198 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 168 major competitor apps |
| players | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 28,398 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 844 major competitor apps |
| winner | 71 | 100 | 39 | 57 2,653 competing apps Median installs: 1,150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 80 major competitor apps |
| chance | 73 | 100 | 44 | 67 10,849 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 337 major competitor apps |
| must | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 28,526 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 499 major competitor apps |
| two | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 31,403 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 437 major competitor apps |
| developer | 72 | 100 | 38 | 60 3,977 competing apps Median installs: 488 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 45 major competitor apps |
| participants | 72 | 100 | 35 | 58 2,966 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 18 major competitor apps |
| points | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 25,839 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 495 major competitor apps |
| round | 73 | 100 | 41 | 63 6,537 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 123 major competitor apps |
| define | 72 | 100 | 36 | 59 3,537 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 25 major competitor apps |
| teams | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 7,851 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 142 major competitor apps |
| throughout | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 17,217 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 213 major competitor apps |
| brazil | 68 | 100 | 28 | 42 313 competing apps Median installs: 975 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
App Description
Prove It is a party game, simulating a court with unusual situations. The minimum number of participants is 3 players, divided into the positions of Judge, Blue Team, and Red Team. At first, the participants must define who will be the Judge, considering that they will have the App in hand throughout the game. Consequently, the Judge must write the names of the other participants at the beginning of the game. This way, the participants will be divided into two teams randomly.
In addition, players must define how many cases will be in the game. In each case, there will be a crime, a place, a weapon, and a victim. Each team must accuse a suspect, randomly defined, and convince the Judge that their suspect is guilty with their story.
In the first round, the Blue Team starts with their argument. Then, the Red Team responds the Blue Team's story. Finally, the Blue Team finishes, and this is their last chance to convince the Judge. The second round is the same, but the positions are inverted. At the end of each case, the Judge can score which team did better. At the end of the game, the accumulation of points will define which team is the winner of the game.
Developed by a team from Apple Developer Academy Brazil with Gabriel Goulart, Lara Pereira, and Thalita Rangel, with the idealization of Gabriela Szpilman, Matheus Kerber, and Vinícius Bonemer.
Download Prove It now! Debating unusual crimes.