Orifice Flow
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 103 keywords for Orifice Flow in Apple App Store
Orifice Flow tracks 103 keywords (2 keywords rank; 101 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.2, difficulty 39.8, best rank 25.
Tracked keywords
103
2 ranked • 101 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 25 • Latest leader 25
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: flow
Avg difficulty
39.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.9
flow
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank 25
Competitors: 88
- 64.5
choosing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 130
- 65.3
conveniently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 107
- 67.2
case
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 123
- 65.4
result
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 81
Unranked opportunities
choosing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 130
conveniently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 107
case
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 123
result
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 81
helpful
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Competitors: 199
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
every
Total apps: 120,649 • Major competitors: 2,494
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
create
Total apps: 119,326 • Major competitors: 2,292
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.7
using
Total apps: 115,141 • Major competitors: 1,548
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
different
Total apps: 95,103 • Major competitors: 1,687
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| flow | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 6,628 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | 25 | 25 | 88 major competitor apps |
| fluid | 71 | 100 | 34 | 55 1,862 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | 129 | 103 | 37 major competitor apps |
| choosing | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,114 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 130 major competitor apps |
| users | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 60,732 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 667 major competitor apps |
| design | 69 | 100 | 48 | 76 36,638 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 671 major competitor apps |
| conveniently | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 7,975 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 107 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 502 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 40,598 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 496 major competitor apps |
| choose | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 90,146 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,766 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,548 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| rate | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 20,106 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 305 major competitor apps |
| validation | 70 | 100 | 29 | 49 817 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 4 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 71 | 100 | 45 | 74 24,710 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 317 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 49,502 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 752 major competitor apps |
| complete | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 65,758 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,215 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 55 | 85 119,326 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,292 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 49 | 81 72,728 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 564 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,500 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 379 major competitor apps |
| case | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 10,386 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 123 major competitor apps |
| following | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 28,825 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 470 major competitor apps |
| every | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 120,649 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,494 major competitor apps |
| quick | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 62,662 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 908 major competitor apps |
| unit | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,263 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 47 major competitor apps |
| meters | 70 | 100 | 30 | 50 1,001 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 13 major competitor apps |
App Description
A case study on CO2 flow rate is shown in the screen shot. The result is consistent with other methods used by the industry in computation and difference is less than 0.1%. Fluids that are not in the list, users can create a custom fluid with property data and compute the flow rate using the model provided in this app. Custom fluid data can be saved and reloaded every time when custom fluid is selected.
Fluids:
Air, Steam, Water, Nitrogen, Oxygen, Hydrogen, Helium, CO2, Methane, Ethane, Chlorine, Ammonia, Argon, Hydraulic oil, HFC(R410A), Custom (user's choice).
Orifice Type:
App gives four different standard orifice design with recommended discharge coefficients as shown in the following screen shot. It also provides the details of the model used in the computation of flow rates for liquid and gases. This model is valid even for nozzles, venturi-flow meters for which the discharge coefficient (Cd) is unity.
Measuring Parameters:
Fluid inlet temperature and pressure, orifice geometry, pressure differential using standard pressure taps (ISO 5167), are the standard parameters required in the computation. Based on the orifice geometry, recommended discharge coefficient Cd is used. However, users can edit this using manufacturer’s data for more accurate results. App notes provides brief description of different orifice parameters for quick reference.
Unit of Measurement:
Users can choose different unit of measurement for both flow as well as pressure drop under given unit standard (SI or USCS). This can be conveniently selected while choosing the fluid from the picker list.
App notes provides additional guideline with a link for complete documentation on implementation and validation of math-models used with industry examples.