Structural Navigator

Developer: Bentley Systems, Inc.

Category: Productivity

Add App to Comparison

~50 - 100

1.00 ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 51 keywords for Structural Navigator in Apple App Store

Developer: Bentley Systems, Inc. Category: productivity Rating: 5

Structural Navigator tracks 51 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 50 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.4, difficulty 40.5, best rank 90.

Tracked keywords

1 ranked • 50 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 90 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.4

Top keyword: due

Avg difficulty

40.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

due

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 52
65.1
property

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 72
65.3
model

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 56
65.3
applications

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 24
63.7
red

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 79
65.7

Unranked opportunities

due

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 52
property

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 72
model

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 56
applications

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Competitors: 24
red

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 79

High competition keywords

mobile

Total apps: 119,357 • Major competitors: 861

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
using

Total apps: 116,012 • Major competitors: 806

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
different

Total apps: 94,692 • Major competitors: 855

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.3
easily

Total apps: 86,460 • Major competitors: 669

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.0
allows

Total apps: 80,736 • Major competitors: 303

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.4

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
navigate	71	100	44	74 24,766 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2	90	90	165 major competitor apps
single	69	100	46	76 36,913 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	313 major competitor apps
member	72	100	42	69 13,416 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	171 major competitor apps
users	68	100	48	80 61,194 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	370 major competitor apps
within	68	100	49	81 68,051 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	678 major competitor apps
using	66	100	51	85 116,012 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	806 major competitor apps
mobile	66	100	51	85 119,357 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	861 major competitor apps
process	70	100	44	74 25,614 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	116 major competitor apps
ideal	71	100	44	73 21,635 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	108 major competitor apps
code	71	100	44	72 20,654 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	115 major competitor apps
easily	67	100	50	83 86,460 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	669 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	49	82 80,736 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	303 major competitor apps
following	70	100	45	75 28,721 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	258 major competitor apps
members	71	100	44	72 19,875 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	182 major competitor apps
different	67	100	50	83 94,692 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	855 major competitor apps
according	72	100	41	69 12,809 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	62 major competitor apps
anywhere	70	100	45	74 27,103 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	283 major competitor apps
build	69	100	48	79 50,239 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	642 major competitor apps
based	67	100	50	82 80,381 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	606 major competitor apps
due	73	100	39	65 7,749 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	52 major competitor apps
query	70	100	31	52 1,347 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	2 major competitor apps
properties	72	100	36	59 3,560 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	31 major competitor apps
property	73	100	40	65 7,958 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	72 major competitor apps
model	73	100	39	65 7,943 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	56 major competitor apps
additional	71	100	45	73 24,312 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	265 major competitor apps

App Description

Structural Navigator is the ideal app for the mobile review of 3D structural models. Structural Navigator allows designers to view, query, and red line structural models in 3D from anywhere using a mobile device. With Structural Navigator users can:
* Navigate through 3D models using zoom, rotate, pan, walkthrough, and flyover commands
* Color code elements within the model according to specific properties (for example, slab thickness, pipe diameter, etc.)
* Filter models based on members with common member attributes
* Check for clashes between different types of objects
* Add markups with status, due date, responsible party, and additional information
* Interactively query members for all property values
Structural Navigator reads Bentley's i-model format, to which any ISM repository can be easily converted with a single operation.
The process is simple. Build a data-rich ISM repository using any Bentley ISM-compliant applications desired, convert the ISM repository to i-model, and then review in Structural Navigator. Structural Navigator can read models from any of the following sources once published to i-model:
- STAAD
- RAM
- SACS
- AECOsim
- Revit
- Tekla
- ProStructures
- Dlubal RFEM