Boiler Efficiency

Category: Tools

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 114 keywords for Boiler Efficiency in Apple App Store

Developer: Kaup Shenoy Associates Category: tools Rating: 4.1

Boiler Efficiency tracks 114 keywords (3 keywords rank; 111 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.4, difficulty 40.8, best rank 14.

Tracked keywords

114

3 ranked • 111 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 14 • Latest leader 17

Avg opportunity

70.4

Top keyword: efficiency

Avg difficulty

40.8

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

efficiency

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank 17

Competitors: 36
63.9
feed

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 187
68.4
conveniently

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 107
65.3
grade

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 118
64.9
generation

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 109
65.6

Unranked opportunities

feed

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Competitors: 187
conveniently

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 107
grade

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 118
generation

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 109
energy

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 169

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
help

Total apps: 150,250 • Major competitors: 2,451

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
create

Total apps: 119,326 • Major competitors: 2,292

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.7
using

Total apps: 115,141 • Major competitors: 1,548

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
different

Total apps: 95,103 • Major competitors: 1,687

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
efficiency	73	100	39	64 6,590 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	17	14	36 major competitor apps
efficiently	72	100	38	63 5,960 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	35	22	33 major competitor apps
efficient	72	100	44	71 16,876 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	72	66	114 major competitor apps
feed	73	100	46	68 12,244 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	187 major competitor apps
users	68	100	50	80 60,732 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	667 major competitor apps
section	72	100	42	69 13,336 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	120 major competitor apps
design	69	100	48	76 36,638 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	671 major competitor apps
conveniently	73	100	41	65 7,975 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	107 major competitor apps
used	69	100	49	79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	502 major competitor apps
save	67	100	53	82 85,036 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,597 major competitor apps
file	72	100	45	70 14,696 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	191 major competitor apps
list	69	100	48	77 40,598 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	496 major competitor apps
choose	67	100	53	83 90,146 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,766 major competitor apps
using	66	100	53	85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,548 major competitor apps
option	72	100	46	71 18,003 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	317 major competitor apps
time	65	100	55	88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,966 major competitor apps
rate	71	100	45	72 20,106 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	305 major competitor apps
help	65	100	55	87 150,250 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,451 major competitor apps
including	68	100	52	81 67,998 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,401 major competitor apps
various	69	100	48	78 48,881 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	723 major competitor apps
audit	70	100	32	52 1,227 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	11 major competitor apps
run	71	100	46	73 22,428 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	499 major competitor apps
create	66	100	55	85 119,326 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,292 major competitor apps
provides	67	100	49	81 72,728 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	564 major competitor apps
tool	69	100	48	78 48,500 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	379 major competitor apps

App Description

BoilerFE can run a quick preliminary audit on boiler efficiency and various losses associated in generation of pressurized steam. Users can create their specific boiler application including CHP (Brayton) cycle by editing default generic boiler and save it in a file for time to time performance review. Thus it would also enable users to compare different grade of fuels used in the same boiler under similar conditions. Therefore, this app can be very helpful to energy engineers and auditors in assessing the potential savings as well as to identify areas for improvement.

App covers different types of boilers including CHP with option to select fuels such as coal, oil and gases with specific compositions. Following is the list of fuels under each category one can select from the picker. Each fuel has a default calorific value (HHV) based on certain composition. Users can edit this default value for accuracy. For fuels that are not in the list, users can create a custom fuel with composition and calorific value.

Coal:
Coal-Illinois, Coal-Pennsylvania, Coal-Ohio, Coal-W.VA, Coal- Kentucky, Coal, Custom.

Fuel Oil:
Furnace Oil#1, Furnace Oil#2, Furnace Oil#3, Furnace Oil#4, Furnace Oil#5, Furnace Oil#6, LSHS, Methanol, Ethanol, LPG, Kerosene, HSD, Custom.

Gas:
Methane, Ethane, Propane, Butane, Natural gas, Custom.

By default, App uses a generic Coal fired in an industrial boiler that can be edited for more specific applications. The screen shots displays this example with results on heat balance sheet, flue gas analysis and stoichiometry. A brief description of the combustion model used in this app is also provided in App notes for reference.

Type of boilers and inputs:
App covers packaged, industrial and utility boilers with specific design data for efficiency and heat balance calculations. Users can conveniently choose the different unit standards for data input. Input such as airflow, fuel type and feed rate can be edited for more specific application using the respective editable tool bar buttons. There is a separate section on CHP (Brayton) cycle that is activated from Boiler info screen. All CHP data can be saved as well with unique titles and reloaded as and when required. Foot notes are provided to help edit different input parameters.

Result:
Besides computation of boiler efficiency using direct method, app provides the followi