Brainf*ck
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 109 keywords for Brainf*ck in Apple App Store
Brainf*ck tracks 109 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 109 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.5, difficulty 38.6.
Tracked keywords
109
0 ranked • 109 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: among
Avg difficulty
38.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.7
among
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 190
- 64.1
moves
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 159
- 66.9
practical
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 60
- 67.8
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 166
- 67.3
term
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 166
Unranked opportunities
among
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 190
moves
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 159
practical
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 60
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 166
term
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 166
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
designed
Total apps: 114,471 • Major competitors: 1,080
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
simple
Total apps: 98,968 • Major competitors: 1,441
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6
data
Total apps: 86,751 • Major competitors: 1,000
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
online
Total apps: 67,632 • Major competitors: 1,285
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| online | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 67,632 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,285 major competitor apps |
| challenge | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 34,298 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 917 major competitor apps |
| commands | 71 | 100 | 34 | 53 1,547 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 32 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 29,567 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 378 major competitor apps |
| language | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 26,856 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 234 major competitor apps |
| simply | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 44,654 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 594 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 502 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 114,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,080 major competitor apps |
| created | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 26,406 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 302 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| goal | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 20,483 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 311 major competitor apps |
| program | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 17,297 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 228 major competitor apps |
| among | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 11,149 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 190 major competitor apps |
| small | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 23,426 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 348 major competitor apps |
| around | 69 | 100 | 52 | 79 49,795 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,033 major competitor apps |
| moves | 73 | 100 | 42 | 64 6,807 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 159 major competitor apps |
| practical | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 9,950 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| simple | 67 | 100 | 52 | 84 98,968 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,441 major competitor apps |
| second | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,305 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 166 major competitor apps |
| break | 72 | 100 | 44 | 69 13,153 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 264 major competitor apps |
| next | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 47,153 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 884 major competitor apps |
| original | 71 | 100 | 49 | 71 18,186 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 541 major competitor apps |
| became | 71 | 100 | 32 | 54 1,615 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| made | 69 | 100 | 49 | 76 36,340 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 579 major competitor apps |
| archive | 71 | 100 | 39 | 57 2,647 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 47 major competitor apps |
App Description
The language consists of only eight simple commands and an instruction pointer. While it is fully Turing complete, it is not intended for practical use, but to challenge and amuse programmers. Brain***k simply requires one to break commands into microscopic steps.
The language's name is a reference to the slang term Brain***k, which refers to things so complicated or unusual that they exceed the limits of one's understanding.
History
In 1992, Urban Müller, a Swiss physics student, took over a small online archive for Amiga software. The archive grew more popular, and was soon mirrored around the world. Today, it is the world's largest Amiga archive, known as Aminet.
Müller designed Brain***k with the goal of implementing it with the smallest possible compiler, inspired by the 1024-byte compiler for the FALSE programming language. Müller's original compiler was implemented in machine language and compiled to a binary with a size of 296 bytes. He uploaded the first Brain***k compiler to Aminet in 1993. The program came with a "Readme" file, which briefly described the language, and challenged the reader "Who can program anything useful with it? :)". Müller also included an interpreter and some quite elaborate examples. A second version of the compiler used only 240 bytes.
As Aminet grew, the compiler became popular among the Amiga community, and in time it was implemented for other platforms. Several Brainf*ck compilers have been made smaller than 200 bytes, and one is only 100 bytes.
Language design
The language consists of eight commands, listed below. A Brain***k program is a sequence of these commands, possibly interspersed with other characters (which are ignored). The commands are executed sequentially, with some exceptions: an instruction pointer begins at the first command, and each command it points to is executed, after which it normally moves forward to the next command. The program terminates when the instruction pointer moves past the last command.
The Brain***k language uses a simple machine model consisting of the program and instruction pointer, as well as an array of at least 30,000 byte cells initialized to zero; a movable data pointer (initialized to point to the leftmost byte of the array); and two stre