Compressor Capacity
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 131 keywords for Compressor Capacity in Apple App Store
Compressor Capacity tracks 131 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 130 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.9, difficulty 38.9, best rank 21.
Tracked keywords
131
1 ranked • 130 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 21 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: efficiency
Avg difficulty
38.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.9
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 36
- 63.8
operation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 43
- 64.4
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 94
- 64.0
stage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 97
- 67.5
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 169
Unranked opportunities
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Competitors: 36
operation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 43
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 94
stage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 97
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 169
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
different
Total apps: 95,103 • Major competitors: 1,687
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
data
Total apps: 86,751 • Major competitors: 1,000
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
world
Total apps: 85,787 • Major competitors: 1,965
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.0
save
Total apps: 85,036 • Major competitors: 1,597
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| capacity | 71 | 100 | 34 | 55 1,936 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | 22 | 21 | 19 major competitor apps |
| change | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 38,601 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 777 major competitor apps |
| single | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 37,414 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 605 major competitor apps |
| order | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 60,309 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 792 major competitor apps |
| sheet | 71 | 100 | 35 | 56 2,354 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 23 major competitor apps |
| users | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 60,732 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 667 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 37,834 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 559 major competitor apps |
| wear | 71 | 100 | 38 | 57 2,549 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 66 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 85,036 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,597 major competitor apps |
| file | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 14,696 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 191 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| key | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 46,710 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 535 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,590 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| operation | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,516 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 43 major competitor apps |
| tests | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,075 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 94 major competitor apps |
| around | 69 | 100 | 52 | 79 49,795 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,033 major competitor apps |
| motor | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,029 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 76 major competitor apps |
| power | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 35,548 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 611 major competitor apps |
| run | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 22,428 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 499 major competitor apps |
| minimum | 72 | 100 | 41 | 60 3,906 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 92 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 77,117 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,352 major competitor apps |
| stage | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,687 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 97 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,500 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 379 major competitor apps |
| bring | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 30,996 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 619 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,788 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 169 major competitor apps |
App Description
Manufacturers give compressor specification data such as FAD, power and other efficiencies at certain standard operating conditions. But, most compressors normally operate between two set pressure points for loading and unloading. Therefore app uses a hypothetical pressure ratio of average discharge pressure to ambient to compute different performance indices. Further, any change in operating conditions such as atmospheric pressure due to altitude, temperature, humidity etc. could also have considerable impact on compressor performance as shown in screen shots. Thus app can be helpful tool to different operation and maintenance personnel to evaluate compressor performance time to time.
Ambient Properties:
Ambient properties such as atmospheric pressure, temperature and humidity values are taken as key input to the computation model. The app computes the pressure for any given altitude. Data for some of the higher altitude (> 1000m) cities around the world are also provided for convenience.
Compressor Specification Data:
A typical compressor specification data sheet is show in the screen shot. FAD, pressure rating and motor hp and rpm data are the minimum requirement based on manufacturers data sheet. Additional data pertaining to reciprocating cylinder data helps to determine the range for FAD for general verification. Volumetric efficiency is primarily depended upon cylinder clearance and generally present in most compressors and in the range of 2% to 12% of total swept volume.
FAD/Leakage Testing
As the compressor put more hours on service, the natural wear and tear could bring down the performance of any compressor. Therefore, it is often necessary to run tests to determine its capacity and also any excess leakage in the compressed air system. This app helps to run quick tests to estimate the losses and concern fo