Fan Spec Performance

Category: Tools

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 117 keywords for Fan Spec Performance in Apple App Store

Developer: Kaup Shenoy Associates Category: tools Rating: 5

Fan Spec Performance tracks 117 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 116 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.5, difficulty 39.9, best rank 104.

Tracked keywords

117

1 ranked • 116 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 104 • Latest leader 104

Avg opportunity

70.5

Top keyword: fan

Avg difficulty

39.9

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

fan

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank 104

Competitors: 235
65.8
flow

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 88
63.9
upon

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 169
67.5
case

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 123
67.2
air

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 220
67.3

Unranked opportunities

flow

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 88
upon

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 169
case

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 123
air

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Competitors: 220
energy

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 169

High competition keywords

help

Total apps: 150,250 • Major competitors: 2,451

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
create

Total apps: 119,326 • Major competitors: 2,292

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.7
different

Total apps: 95,103 • Major competitors: 1,687

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
choose

Total apps: 90,146 • Major competitors: 1,766

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
available

Total apps: 89,249 • Major competitors: 1,834

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.7

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
fan	73	100	42	66 8,559 competing apps Median installs: 950 Avg rating: 4.1	104	104	235 major competitor apps
action	72	100	46	71 17,983 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	479 major competitor apps
better	69	100	49	77 41,612 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	716 major competitor apps
users	68	100	50	80 60,732 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	667 major competitor apps
used	69	100	49	79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	502 major competitor apps
save	67	100	53	82 85,036 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,597 major competitor apps
file	72	100	45	70 14,696 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	191 major competitor apps
choose	67	100	53	83 90,146 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,766 major competitor apps
available	67	100	55	83 89,249 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,834 major competitor apps
provide	68	100	49	79 55,996 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	558 major competitor apps
key	69	100	48	78 46,710 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	535 major competitor apps
help	65	100	55	87 150,250 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,451 major competitor apps
multiple	68	100	51	81 68,625 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,107 major competitor apps
validation	70	100	29	49 817 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	4 major competitor apps
quickly	69	100	49	79 49,502 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	752 major competitor apps
complete	68	100	50	81 65,758 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,215 major competitor apps
create	66	100	55	85 119,326 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,292 major competitor apps
comprehensive	70	100	47	76 35,412 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	264 major competitor apps
flow	73	100	40	64 6,628 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	88 major competitor apps
type	71	100	46	73 23,814 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	289 major competitor apps
upon	73	100	41	67 10,788 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	169 major competitor apps
performance	71	100	45	73 24,352 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	243 major competitor apps
case	73	100	42	67 10,386 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	123 major competitor apps
terminal	70	100	35	53 1,433 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 3.8	—	—	15 major competitor apps
following	70	100	46	75 28,825 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	470 major competitor apps

App Description

FanSpec helps to evaluate different fan specification for a given application based performance characteristics such as flow rate, static pressure, shaft power, and fan efficiency. It also determines the average duct velocity duct pressure loss and duct leakage rates that are very critical to satisfactory performance and energy efficiency. Users can create multiple applications of fan-duct system and then save it in a file for evaluation and review.

Most manufacturers provide fan performance data in the form of fan curve (Q vs H). However, the operating point on this curve depends upon the total resistance offered by the duct system. This app helps application engineers to quickly evaluate different options available in selection and application of fans. One can chose either SI or USCS system of units for input and outputs as shown in the screen shots.

Fan properties:
Fans are categorized based on the type of flow. The flow can be either axial or radial by centrifugal action based on type of application it is employed. In either case one can edit and enter key fan specification data as shown in the following screen shot.

Gas properties:
By default Air is used as gas medium and its properties are updated based on the input temperature. For gases other than air, the property data such as density, viscosity at given temperature for better accuracy.

Duct system
Users can choose any duct system based on cross section, class, size and material. Upon selection, app auto updates the duct leakage rates as per recommended standards. The total equivalent length data is used for evaluation of duct losses that includes resistance due to different duct fittings and terminal box etc.

Performance summary:
A comprehensive summary is provided as shown in the screen shot that includes different performance characteristics of a fan-duct system. This would help in evaluation of different fans for a given application. App notes is provided for a quick reference that has brief descriptions of different fan performance characteristics. In addition link is provided to a complete documentation on implementation and validation of different math-models used in all apps.