Schifter
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 72 keywords for Schifter in Apple App Store
Schifter tracks 72 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 72 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 39.5.
Tracked keywords
72
0 ranked • 72 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: setting
Avg difficulty
39.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.4
setting
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 206
- 67.3
among
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 187
- 66.6
success
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 148
- 68.3
coming
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 220
- 67.9
precise
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 148
Unranked opportunities
setting
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 206
among
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Competitors: 187
success
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 148
coming
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.7 • Competitors: 220
precise
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 148
High competition keywords
free
Total apps: 176,038 • Major competitors: 3,927
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
help
Total apps: 162,255 • Major competitors: 2,471
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
available
Total apps: 95,747 • Major competitors: 1,852
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
easily
Total apps: 85,281 • Major competitors: 1,267
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
based
Total apps: 79,282 • Major competitors: 1,049
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| free | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 176,038 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,927 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 41,425 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 708 major competitor apps |
| setting | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 12,966 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 206 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 50,510 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 496 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 95,747 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,852 major competitor apps |
| basic | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,968 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 195 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 162,255 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,471 major competitor apps |
| update | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 22,778 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 358 major competitor apps |
| among | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 11,109 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 187 major competitor apps |
| success | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,160 competing apps Median installs: 470 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 148 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 49,267 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 754 major competitor apps |
| power | 69 | 100 | 48 | 76 38,702 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 619 major competitor apps |
| angle | 72 | 100 | 36 | 58 3,053 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 48 major competitor apps |
| easily | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 85,281 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,267 major competitor apps |
| contain | 72 | 100 | 37 | 60 4,016 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 63 major competitor apps |
| together | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 20,843 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 394 major competitor apps |
| coming | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 12,733 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 220 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,175 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| required | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,702 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 235 major competitor apps |
| precise | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 12,174 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 148 major competitor apps |
| field | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 14,233 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 93 major competitor apps |
| build | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 57,977 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,219 major competitor apps |
| calculated | 72 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,722 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 25 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 51 | 81 79,282 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,049 major competitor apps |
| completion | 72 | 100 | 36 | 59 3,781 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 24 major competitor apps |
App Description
(the result field to be used turns green)
This calculation is merely based on you entering the beams’ designated inclination of installation (inclination of the hip rafters) and the number of beams coming together (hip rafters).
With the help of Schifter, you can quickly construct a symmetric roof or other object, fitting perfectly.
Mode of operation:
With your input, namely the inclination and the number of the beams, the sawing angles to be chosen (mitre and inclination) for circular saws, mitre saws, sliding compound mitre saws, power saws with 3D cuts etc. are being calculated.
Owing to largely unchanged settings oft he saw, Schifter enables you to quickly and easily do jack rafter cuts (double angle cuts or double mitre cuts). Such cuts are mainly being used in roof, wood and metal construction.
Saving of time: Thanks to Schifter, you no longer need to painstakingly sketch the sawing angle onto each workpiece. Schifter aims at a quicker completion with a consistently precise sawing result and the workpieces’ better accurancy to fit. Precision: The icosahedron and the tented roof screenshots are meant to demonstrate Schifter’s precision.
The required cutting angles were calculated by Schifter and then cut with a commercially available sliding compound mitre saw.
The consistently precise angles of the sawn parts are a basic prerequisite for the success of a platonic solid. Among other features, a free update of the Schifter App to be released later will contain instructions on how to build an icosahedron, a dodecahedron, an octahedron, a hexahedron and a tetrahedron.