Energy Cycles
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 121 keywords for Energy Cycles in Apple App Store
Energy Cycles tracks 121 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 121 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.9, difficulty 39.2.
Tracked keywords
121
0 ranked • 121 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.9
Top keyword: feed
Avg difficulty
39.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.4
feed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 187
- 63.9
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 36
- 64.9
continuous
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 77
- 64.0
stage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 97
- 67.5
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 169
Unranked opportunities
feed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Competitors: 187
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Competitors: 36
continuous
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 77
stage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 97
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 169
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
view
Total apps: 97,553 • Major competitors: 1,290
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
different
Total apps: 95,103 • Major competitors: 1,687
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
data
Total apps: 86,751 • Major competitors: 1,000
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
users
Total apps: 60,732 • Major competitors: 667
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| feed | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 12,244 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 187 major competitor apps |
| changes | 72 | 100 | 44 | 69 13,260 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
| users | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 60,732 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 667 major competitor apps |
| tailored | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 27,914 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 372 major competitor apps |
| graphical | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,138 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| section | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 13,336 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 120 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 45 | 71 18,196 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 195 major competitor apps |
| file | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 14,696 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 191 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| added | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 19,916 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 404 major competitor apps |
| note | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 15,010 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 260 major competitor apps |
| touch | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 38,404 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 617 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,590 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| monitor | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 29,342 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 367 major competitor apps |
| continuous | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,513 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 77 major competitor apps |
| power | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 35,548 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 611 major competitor apps |
| view | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 97,553 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,290 major competitor apps |
| comprehensive | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 35,412 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 264 major competitor apps |
| stage | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,687 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 97 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,500 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 379 major competitor apps |
| part | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 29,377 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 405 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,788 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 169 major competitor apps |
| performance | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 24,352 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 243 major competitor apps |
| devices | 71 | 100 | 48 | 73 24,538 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 448 major competitor apps |
| following | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 28,825 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 470 major competitor apps |
App Description
Energy Cycles:
I Rankine Cycle
a. Boiler (conventional fossil fuel)
b. Turbine (single, two and three stage)
c. Condenser
d. Feed Pump
II Combined Heat and Power (CHP Brayton) Cycle
a. Air compressor
b. Fuel Injection
c. Gas Turbine
d. Steam Generator
III HVAC Cooling Cycle
a. Conditioned space
b. Outdoor Air
c. Fan-coil process
d. Return and Exhaust air flows
IV HVAC Heating Cycle
a. Conditioned space
b. Outdoor Air
c. Fan-coil process
d. Return and Exhaust air flows
Each cycle component responds to individual touch for editing. Upon editing, state properties are computed and presented in a table form and displayed in the scroll view of the respective home screen.
The following screen shot on Rankine cycle has a 3 stage turbine and hence got 8 states. Inter-stages of the turbine with temperature and pressure data are also shown in the screen shot that is in response to the tapping of turbine icon in the model. Accordingly, the thermodynamic state properties of steam are calculated and presented in the property table of the Rankine cycle.
For HVAC, a separate section has been added as a part of conditioned space for editing cooling and heating load under 10 major categories as shown in the screen shot. A separate computation button is provided for the users to select and compute load under each category by editing default parameters as per recommended practice. A comprehensive foot note is also provided under each category for proper editing and load computation.
Cycle performance