Compare Flow

Developer: iENGINEERING Corporation

Category: Productivity

Add App to Comparison

250 installs

5.00 ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 27 keywords for Compare Flow in Apple App Store

Developer: iENGINEERING Corporation Category: productivity Rating: 4.6

Compare Flow tracks 27 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 26 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.5, difficulty 35.5, best rank 120.

Tracked keywords

1 ranked • 26 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 120 • Latest leader 120

Avg opportunity

70.5

Top keyword: compare

Avg difficulty

35.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

compare

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank 120

Competitors: 235
68.3
among

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 180
67.7
flow

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 86
63.9
box

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 124
64.3
either

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 120
67.9

Unranked opportunities

among

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 180
flow

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 86
box

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 124
either

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 120
pressure

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Competitors: 105

High competition keywords

including

Total apps: 68,047 • Major competitors: 1,358

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.0
order

Total apps: 60,300 • Major competitors: 760

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.2
various

Total apps: 48,900 • Major competitors: 673

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.5
uses

Total apps: 21,885 • Major competitors: 233

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 44.0
possible

Total apps: 20,748 • Major competitors: 250

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 43.8

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
compare	73	100	42	68 12,110 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3	120	120	235 major competitor apps
order	68	100	49	80 60,300 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	760 major competitor apps
including	68	100	50	81 68,047 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,358 major competitor apps
various	69	100	48	78 48,900 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	673 major competitor apps
among	73	100	41	68 11,156 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	180 major competitor apps
flow	73	100	39	64 6,621 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	86 major competitor apps
pressure	72	100	38	63 5,836 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	105 major competitor apps
possible	71	100	44	72 20,748 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	250 major competitor apps
box	73	100	39	64 6,998 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	124 major competitor apps
uses	71	100	44	73 21,885 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	233 major competitor apps
evaluate	71	100	35	58 2,875 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	9 major competitor apps
pipe	70	100	30	49 824 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	6 major competitor apps
sections	72	100	36	60 3,733 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	24 major competitor apps
capacity	71	100	33	55 1,935 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	13 major competitor apps
metal	71	100	33	55 1,858 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	33 major competitor apps
either	73	100	41	68 11,474 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	120 major competitor apps
arch	67	100	21	35 117 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1 major competitor apps
evaluating	69	100	28	47 610 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	3 major competitor apps
concrete	70	100	30	49 857 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	8 major competitor apps
formula	71	100	33	54 1,655 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	24 major competitor apps
accepted	70	100	32	53 1,391 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	18 major competitor apps
geometry	70	100	29	48 753 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	10 major competitor apps
circular	70	100	30	50 1,008 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	7 major competitor apps
widely	71	100	32	54 1,603 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	7 major competitor apps
pipes	69	100	27	44 402 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	6 major competitor apps

App Description

Compare Flow app uses Manning's Formula, the most widely accepted formula for evaluating the hydraulic capacity of non-pressure sewers.

In order to evaluate possible alternatives in either pipe geometry or material, use this app to compare the hydraulic flow capacity among various concrete pipes including circular, elliptical, arch and box sections with circular thermoplastic and corrugated metal pipes.