Compare Flow

Developer: iENGINEERING Corporation

Category: Productivity

~250 - 500

5 ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 27 keywords for Compare Flow in Apple App Store

Developer: iENGINEERING Corporation Category: productivity Rating: 4.6

Compare Flow tracks 27 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 26 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 47.9, difficulty 34.3, best rank 120.

Tracked keywords

1 ranked • 26 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 120 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

47.9

Top keyword: including

Avg difficulty

34.3

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

including

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 62.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 926
81.2
various

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 374
75.5
among

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 116
61.7
possible

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 127
64.0
uses

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 156
64.9

Unranked opportunities

including

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 62.0 • Competitors: 926
various

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.5 • Competitors: 374
among

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.8 • Competitors: 116
possible

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Competitors: 127
uses

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.4 • Competitors: 156

High competition keywords

including

Total apps: 3,880 • Major competitors: 926

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.0
various

Total apps: 2,177 • Major competitors: 374

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.5
order

Total apps: 1,756 • Major competitors: 456

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.0
uses

Total apps: 740 • Major competitors: 156

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 45.4
possible

Total apps: 677 • Major competitors: 127

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 43.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
compare	20	100	50	62 547 competing apps Median installs: 307,075 Avg rating: 4.7	120	120	137 major competitor apps
order	20	100	61	73 1,756 competing apps Median installs: 288,212 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	456 major competitor apps
including	58	100	62	81 3,880 competing apps Median installs: 285,400 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	926 major competitor apps
various	58	100	50	75 2,177 competing apps Median installs: 229,325 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	374 major competitor apps
among	58	100	46	62 533 competing apps Median installs: 247,375 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	116 major competitor apps
flow	57	100	37	53 230 competing apps Median installs: 235,462 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	37 major competitor apps
pressure	57	100	38	54 253 competing apps Median installs: 218,975 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	56 major competitor apps
possible	58	100	43	64 677 competing apps Median installs: 229,825 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	127 major competitor apps
box	57	100	41	56 301 competing apps Median installs: 302,875 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	70 major competitor apps
uses	58	100	45	65 740 competing apps Median installs: 230,338 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	156 major competitor apps
evaluate	57	100	26	38 48 competing apps Median installs: 185,075 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	5 major competitor apps
pipe	56	100	27	31 23 competing apps Median installs: 222,275 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	4 major competitor apps
sections	57	100	37	45 101 competing apps Median installs: 200,075 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	13 major competitor apps
capacity	57	100	25	40 55 competing apps Median installs: 240,400 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	7 major competitor apps
metal	57	100	31	45 93 competing apps Median installs: 261,525 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	17 major competitor apps
either	58	100	41	60 436 competing apps Median installs: 218,075 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	77 major competitor apps
arch	0	41	13	18 5 competing apps Median installs: 209,900 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	1 major competitor apps
evaluating	0	56	17	20 7 competing apps Median installs: 313,125 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	3 major competitor apps
concrete	56	100	20	28 17 competing apps Median installs: 166,775 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	4 major competitor apps
formula	57	100	27	39 51 competing apps Median installs: 246,450 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	11 major competitor apps
accepted	57	100	62	39 54 competing apps Median installs: 323,588 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	13 major competitor apps
geometry	56	100	24	32 26 competing apps Median installs: 348,025 Avg rating: 4.5	—	—	6 major competitor apps
circular	56	100	27	32 24 competing apps Median installs: 233,075 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	3 major competitor apps
widely	56	100	23	35 33 competing apps Median installs: 179,475 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	4 major competitor apps
pipes	56	100	23	30 20 competing apps Median installs: 230,700 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	4 major competitor apps

App Description

Compare Flow app uses Manning's Formula, the most widely accepted formula for evaluating the hydraulic capacity of non-pressure sewers.

In order to evaluate possible alternatives in either pipe geometry or material, use this app to compare the hydraulic flow capacity among various concrete pipes including circular, elliptical, arch and box sections with circular thermoplastic and corrugated metal pipes.