LFIC
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 46 keywords for LFIC in Apple App Store
LFIC tracks 46 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 46 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.5, difficulty 42.0.
Tracked keywords
46
0 ranked • 46 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: format
Avg difficulty
42.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.1
format
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 53
- 68.0
functions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 52
- 67.4
random
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 144
- 67.1
later
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 103
- 64.2
tapping
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 67
Unranked opportunities
format
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 53
functions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 52
random
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 144
later
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 103
tapping
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.8 • Competitors: 67
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 191,460 • Major competitors: 1,852
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
free
Total apps: 164,090 • Major competitors: 2,531
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
every
Total apps: 121,274 • Major competitors: 1,623
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6
information
Total apps: 111,937 • Major competitors: 690
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
contact
Total apps: 58,789 • Major competitors: 432
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| free | 65 | 100 | 53 | 87 164,090 competing apps Median installs: 175 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,531 major competitor apps |
| 70 | 100 | 46 | 76 35,889 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 358 major competitor apps | |
| page | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 14,938 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 159 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 48 | 80 57,138 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 457 major competitor apps |
| contact | 68 | 100 | 48 | 80 58,789 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 432 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 111,937 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 690 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 53 | 88 191,460 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,852 major competitor apps |
| touch | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 38,323 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 356 major competitor apps |
| function | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 13,866 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 81 major competitor apps |
| format | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 8,838 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 53 major competitor apps |
| ios | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 32,254 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 265 major competitor apps |
| text | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 40,693 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 378 major competitor apps |
| completely | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,513 competing apps Median installs: 175 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 194 major competitor apps |
| functions | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 11,511 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 52 major competitor apps |
| generate | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 20,737 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 115 major competitor apps |
| every | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 121,274 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,623 major competitor apps |
| tap | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 52,171 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 646 major competitor apps |
| required | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 18,878 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 146 major competitor apps |
| random | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,697 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 144 major competitor apps |
| feel | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 39,136 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 517 major competitor apps |
| provided | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 19,141 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 103 major competitor apps |
| iphone | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 40,018 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 433 major competitor apps |
| field | 72 | 100 | 41 | 69 12,976 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 55 major competitor apps |
| standard | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 15,672 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 138 major competitor apps |
| unwanted | 72 | 100 | 37 | 60 3,836 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 76 major competitor apps |
App Description
Automatically calculates the pinning charts for Corbin-Russwin (System 70 & Non-System 70), Sargent (Standard and Degree), Medeco 32 Series, and Assa (Sargent & Yale / Corbin-Russwin).
Obeys required rules set by Corbin-Russwin, Sargent, Medeco, and Assa respectively.
Randomize function will generate completely random charts each time it is triggered while obeying any applicable MACS rules.
Easy to use interface: Every text field "autotabs" so there is no need to tap on every box.
Freeze inputs and functions by tapping the Lock/Unlock toggle to prevent unwanted changes.
MACS chart provided in information page for Medeco.
AirPrint or Email systems.
Compatibility: iPhone / iPod touch on iOS 8.0 or later and iPad on iOS 12.0 or later.
Found a bug? Something not working? Have a suggestion? Feel free to contact me via email: phil@locksmithapps.com