redLearn
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 131 keywords for redLearn in Apple App Store
redLearn tracks 131 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 131 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 48.6, difficulty 40.2.
Tracked keywords
131
0 ranked • 131 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
48.6
Top keyword: free
Avg difficulty
40.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 89.9
free
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 2,147
- 83.9
experience
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,134
- 77.7
level
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 638
- 61.2
maps
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 120
- 74.7
better
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 450
Unranked opportunities
free
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.5 • Competitors: 2,147
experience
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.1 • Competitors: 1,134
level
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.8 • Competitors: 638
maps
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.0 • Competitors: 120
better
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.5 • Competitors: 450
High competition keywords
free
Total apps: 9,480 • Major competitors: 2,147
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.5
experience
Total apps: 5,154 • Major competitors: 1,134
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.1
within
Total apps: 3,722 • Major competitors: 740
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2
designed
Total apps: 3,407 • Major competitors: 624
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.8
based
Total apps: 3,039 • Major competitors: 697
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| free | 59 | 100 | 63 | 90 9,480 competing apps Median installs: 264,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2,147 major competitor apps |
| level | 58 | 100 | 54 | 78 2,734 competing apps Median installs: 274,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 638 major competitor apps |
| maps | 58 | 100 | 49 | 61 507 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 120 major competitor apps |
| better | 58 | 100 | 53 | 75 2,000 competing apps Median installs: 250,162 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 450 major competitor apps |
| experience | 59 | 100 | 59 | 84 5,154 competing apps Median installs: 261,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,134 major competitor apps |
| curated | 20 | 100 | 52 | 62 576 competing apps Median installs: 309,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 159 major competitor apps |
| learn | 58 | 100 | 57 | 77 2,669 competing apps Median installs: 250,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 552 major competitor apps |
| within | 58 | 100 | 56 | 81 3,722 competing apps Median installs: 259,688 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 740 major competitor apps |
| tech | 57 | 100 | 47 | 55 282 competing apps Median installs: 255,288 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| information | 58 | 100 | 57 | 78 2,704 competing apps Median installs: 252,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 572 major competitor apps |
| team | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,972 competing apps Median installs: 284,662 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 445 major competitor apps |
| designed | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,407 competing apps Median installs: 230,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 624 major competitor apps |
| created | 58 | 100 | 47 | 67 953 competing apps Median installs: 213,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 153 major competitor apps |
| list | 58 | 100 | 52 | 70 1,187 competing apps Median installs: 244,150 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 251 major competitor apps |
| people | 58 | 100 | 60 | 75 2,083 competing apps Median installs: 271,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 492 major competitor apps |
| built | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 855 competing apps Median installs: 239,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 175 major competitor apps |
| option | 58 | 100 | 49 | 65 768 competing apps Median installs: 264,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 152 major competitor apps |
| key | 58 | 100 | 51 | 69 1,089 competing apps Median installs: 257,575 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 226 major competitor apps |
| giving | 58 | 100 | 45 | 63 589 competing apps Median installs: 247,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 131 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 58 | 100 | 53 | 69 1,101 competing apps Median installs: 270,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
| powers | 20 | 100 | 37 | 52 202 competing apps Median installs: 315,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 53 major competitor apps |
| explore | 58 | 100 | 61 | 79 3,030 competing apps Median installs: 275,988 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 711 major competitor apps |
| understanding | 57 | 100 | 37 | 55 266 competing apps Median installs: 199,150 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 39 major competitor apps |
| helping | 58 | 100 | 45 | 63 640 competing apps Median installs: 235,312 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 128 major competitor apps |
| test | 58 | 100 | 50 | 73 1,727 competing apps Median installs: 258,500 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 389 major competitor apps |
App Description
The first one being the redVerse which is the redBus Metaverse (a virtual reality experience). The metaverse or redVerse has two segments, one representing the office space with people seated at office; while it’s second part is an experiential redBus city created with moving traffic and buildings, where each building represents a technological/engineering team at redBus. The buildings can be explored by entering the main door which leads into an auditorium where the architectural notes of the specific engineering team are displayed along with a Byte sized learning sound bites module being played giving out information on what that team does and how it has been built. The office redVerse module helps people explore and understand remotely how the layout of our main engineering R&D center is designed along with visibility on key people within the office premise. The redVerse city helps people experience and learn interactively how the entire redBus ecosystem has been designed from a tech standpoint. Helping people assimilate information quickly; understanding important heat maps of our complex microservices based architectural setup better with availability of information represented in an interactive forum.
The second segment of the application covers a fully homegrown assessment module, where the competency framework designed for engineering teams curated in-house powers the test with backend logic based on the framework. It allows people approved by org; to select their job level and team within engineering prior to an assessment, and exhibits precise questions as per the competency requirement for the individual; which is team specific and has 5 questions per competency covered. The validated competency framework setup in the backend has level wise functional expectations set at basic, intermediate and expert; thus the questions generated and scoring logic has been set based on the same. The level of expertise needed for each level defines the number of questions which need to be answered correctly. Once the test has been taken the competencies with low scores get flagged and a get course option pops up for the assessee. On clicking this ‘get course’ option the assessee gets a list of learning courses realtime from learning sites across the internet offering free and relevant learning mater