redLearn
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 132 keywords for redLearn in Apple App Store
redLearn tracks 132 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 132 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.5, difficulty 40.2.
Tracked keywords
132
0 ranked • 132 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: maps
Avg difficulty
40.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.8
maps
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 225
- 68.1
curated
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 210
- 63.8
tech
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 114
- 67.9
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 168
- 66.7
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 115
Unranked opportunities
maps
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Competitors: 225
curated
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.1 • Competitors: 210
tech
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 114
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 168
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 115
High competition keywords
free
Total apps: 176,016 • Major competitors: 3,926
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
experience
Total apps: 135,700 • Major competitors: 2,192
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1
information
Total apps: 121,649 • Major competitors: 1,140
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
designed
Total apps: 113,960 • Major competitors: 1,088
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
allows
Total apps: 80,154 • Major competitors: 662
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| free | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 176,016 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,926 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 55,867 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,185 major competitor apps |
| maps | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 11,888 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 225 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 41,454 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 713 major competitor apps |
| experience | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 135,700 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,192 major competitor apps |
| curated | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 12,445 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 210 major competitor apps |
| learn | 67 | 100 | 52 | 81 78,844 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,087 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 67,154 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,305 major competitor apps |
| tech | 73 | 100 | 43 | 64 6,864 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 114 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 121,649 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,140 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 44,996 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 871 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 51 | 84 113,960 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,088 major competitor apps |
| created | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 26,301 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 303 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 43,625 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 500 major competitor apps |
| people | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 56,353 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 918 major competitor apps |
| built | 71 | 100 | 45 | 74 26,973 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 258 major competitor apps |
| option | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 19,021 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 324 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 49 | 80 62,180 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 543 major competitor apps |
| giving | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,925 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 244 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 24,447 competing apps Median installs: 528 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 478 major competitor apps |
| powers | 71 | 100 | 38 | 56 2,305 competing apps Median installs: 950 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 76 major competitor apps |
| explore | 68 | 100 | 53 | 80 67,919 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,354 major competitor apps |
| understanding | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 15,789 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 92 major competitor apps |
| helping | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,458 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 211 major competitor apps |
| test | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 42,097 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 714 major competitor apps |
App Description
The first one being the redVerse which is the redBus Metaverse (a virtual reality experience). The metaverse or redVerse has two segments, one representing the office space with people seated at office; while it’s second part is an experiential redBus city created with moving traffic and buildings, where each building represents a technological/engineering team at redBus. The buildings can be explored by entering the main door which leads into an auditorium where the architectural notes of the specific engineering team are displayed along with a Byte sized learning sound bites module being played giving out information on what that team does and how it has been built. The office redVerse module helps people explore and understand remotely how the layout of our main engineering R&D center is designed along with visibility on key people within the office premise. The redVerse city helps people experience and learn interactively how the entire redBus ecosystem has been designed from a tech standpoint. Helping people assimilate information quickly; understanding important heat maps of our complex microservices based architectural setup better with availability of information represented in an interactive forum.
The second segment of the application covers a fully homegrown assessment module, where the competency framework designed for engineering teams curated in-house powers the test with backend logic based on the framework. It allows people approved by org; to select their job level and team within engineering prior to an assessment, and exhibits precise questions as per the competency requirement for the individual; which is team specific and has 5 questions per competency covered. The validated competency framework setup in the backend has level wise functional expectations set at basic, intermediate and expert; thus the questions generated and scoring logic has been set based on the same. The level of expertise needed for each level defines the number of questions which need to be answered correctly. Once the test has been taken the competencies with low scores get flagged and a get course option pops up for the assessee. On clicking this ‘get course’ option the assessee gets a list of learning courses realtime from learning sites across the internet offering free and relevant learning mater