redLearn
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 132 keywords for redLearn in Apple App Store
redLearn tracks 132 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 132 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.4, difficulty 38.5.
Tracked keywords
132
0 ranked • 132 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.4
Top keyword: maps
Avg difficulty
38.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.7
maps
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 123
- 68.7
curated
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 133
- 67.8
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 81
- 67.3
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 59
- 68.2
course
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 59
Unranked opportunities
maps
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 123
curated
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 133
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 81
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 59
course
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 59
High competition keywords
free
Total apps: 163,538 • Major competitors: 2,215
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.9
experience
Total apps: 121,422 • Major competitors: 1,217
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
designed
Total apps: 115,277 • Major competitors: 563
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
information
Total apps: 111,662 • Major competitors: 587
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
allows
Total apps: 80,664 • Major competitors: 304
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| free | 65 | 100 | 53 | 87 163,538 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,215 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 51,380 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 674 major competitor apps |
| maps | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 11,015 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 123 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 41,881 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 404 major competitor apps |
| experience | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 121,422 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,217 major competitor apps |
| curated | 73 | 100 | 42 | 69 12,682 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 133 major competitor apps |
| learn | 67 | 100 | 49 | 81 72,877 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 581 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 67,973 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 682 major competitor apps |
| tech | 72 | 100 | 39 | 63 6,034 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 61 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 111,662 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 587 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 40,662 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 459 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 115,277 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 563 major competitor apps |
| created | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 26,592 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 133 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 40,415 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 259 major competitor apps |
| people | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 51,531 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 502 major competitor apps |
| built | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 27,657 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 147 major competitor apps |
| option | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,959 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 162 major competitor apps |
| key | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 45,084 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 278 major competitor apps |
| giving | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,090 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 133 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 22,654 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 286 major competitor apps |
| powers | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,319 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 49 major competitor apps |
| explore | 68 | 100 | 49 | 80 59,844 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 769 major competitor apps |
| understanding | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 14,118 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 40 major competitor apps |
| helping | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 18,802 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 118 major competitor apps |
| test | 69 | 100 | 46 | 77 38,346 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 408 major competitor apps |
App Description
The first one being the redVerse which is the redBus Metaverse (a virtual reality experience). The metaverse or redVerse has two segments, one representing the office space with people seated at office; while it’s second part is an experiential redBus city created with moving traffic and buildings, where each building represents a technological/engineering team at redBus. The buildings can be explored by entering the main door which leads into an auditorium where the architectural notes of the specific engineering team are displayed along with a Byte sized learning sound bites module being played giving out information on what that team does and how it has been built. The office redVerse module helps people explore and understand remotely how the layout of our main engineering R&D center is designed along with visibility on key people within the office premise. The redVerse city helps people experience and learn interactively how the entire redBus ecosystem has been designed from a tech standpoint. Helping people assimilate information quickly; understanding important heat maps of our complex microservices based architectural setup better with availability of information represented in an interactive forum.
The second segment of the application covers a fully homegrown assessment module, where the competency framework designed for engineering teams curated in-house powers the test with backend logic based on the framework. It allows people approved by org; to select their job level and team within engineering prior to an assessment, and exhibits precise questions as per the competency requirement for the individual; which is team specific and has 5 questions per competency covered. The validated competency framework setup in the backend has level wise functional expectations set at basic, intermediate and expert; thus the questions generated and scoring logic has been set based on the same. The level of expertise needed for each level defines the number of questions which need to be answered correctly. Once the test has been taken the competencies with low scores get flagged and a get course option pops up for the assessee. On clicking this ‘get course’ option the assessee gets a list of learning courses realtime from learning sites across the internet offering free and relevant learning mater