Magic Tines
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 129 keywords for Magic Tines in Apple App Store
Magic Tines tracks 129 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 128 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.3, difficulty 38.1, best rank 157.
Tracked keywords
129
1 ranked • 128 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 157 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.3
Top keyword: simulation
Avg difficulty
38.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.5
simulation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 186
- 67.6
mark
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 163
- 65.6
exact
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 132
- 67.5
functions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 108
- 64.7
release
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 139
Unranked opportunities
simulation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 186
mark
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 163
exact
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 132
functions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 108
release
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 139
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 189,872 • Major competitors: 2,979
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
best
Total apps: 124,586 • Major competitors: 2,642
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
every
Total apps: 120,071 • Major competitors: 2,501
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
using
Total apps: 114,639 • Major competitors: 1,562
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
real
Total apps: 105,270 • Major competitors: 1,803
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hybrid | 71 | 100 | 42 | 54 1,803 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | 158 | 157 | 31 major competitor apps |
| best | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 124,586 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,642 major competitor apps |
| simulation | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,605 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 186 major competitor apps |
| music | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 34,183 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 585 major competitor apps |
| audio | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 34,852 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 407 major competitor apps |
| digital | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 52,249 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 719 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 50,542 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 503 major competitor apps |
| modern | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 25,988 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 317 major competitor apps |
| choose | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 89,645 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,775 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,639 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,562 major competitor apps |
| life | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 63,664 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 971 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 189,872 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,979 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 95,747 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,852 major competitor apps |
| note | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 16,115 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 262 major competitor apps |
| special | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 48,122 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,056 major competitor apps |
| mark | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,557 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 163 major competitor apps |
| group | 71 | 100 | 50 | 73 25,646 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 311 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 49,297 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 758 major competitor apps |
| delay | 71 | 100 | 36 | 57 2,639 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 41 major competitor apps |
| tube | 70 | 100 | 30 | 49 842 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 20 major competitor apps |
| part | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 29,306 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 408 major competitor apps |
| real | 67 | 100 | 54 | 84 105,270 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,803 major competitor apps |
| exact | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 8,863 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 132 major competitor apps |
| functions | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 11,457 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 108 major competitor apps |
| every | 66 | 100 | 54 | 84 120,071 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,501 major competitor apps |
App Description
INSTRUMENT BACKGROUND
The Rhodes Piano was invented during WWII by an american music teacher, Harold B. Rhodes (1910 - 2000), and has been widely used for decades in nearly every genre of music ranging from soul music to jazz, blues, modern and pop. This instrument quickly became a legend, and is still used today. In 2007 it had a first rebirth thanks to an American entrepreneur who tried to restore the glory to this instrument, so the Mark 7 was born, but unfortunately his venture failed after a few years. In 2021, a group of British entrepreneurs acquired the brand and put a revamped edition of this instrument back into production, the Mark 8.
In digital territory, the sound of a Rhodes piano is an important part of every digital piano / keyboard / workstation, and is reproduced mainly using samples, and in a few cases using some kind of synthesis. The Crumar Seven is one example of a hardware digital piano that uses real Physical Modeling to recreate the sound of a Tine Piano, i.e. it doesn't use any samples to recreate the sound, just real-time math calculations.
GSi Magic Tines uses a different approach, which consists in both sampling and modeling, whereas all attack and release transients come from recordings of real life electric pianos, and the body of each note is recreated by a special synthesizer that uses math functions to simulate the exact behavior of a steel tine being struck by a rubber hammer tip. What is excluded by the synthesis engine is compensated by the sampled material. In other words, the best of the two worlds.
Main features
- Hybrid Modeling engine (samples + synthesis)
- Full Polyphony (up to 88 keys)
- Three EP models to choose from
- Parameters for adjusting both the sampled part and the synthesis part separately
- Three band semi-parametric EQ
- Mono or Stereo tremolo with opto-coupler panner
- Amplifier simulation with 5 different models
- Tube overdrive effect
- Adjustable stereo chorus
- Phaser effect with six different models
- Stereo Delay effect
- Stereo Reverb effect
- User programmable Velocity curve
- Built-in programmer with unlimited Programs
- Embedded user's manual
- Available as Stand-alone application and audio plugin
- Very low CPU and RAM usage
- AUv3 for iPad and iPhone
- Supports Background audio and Bluetooth Midi