MP Sitting RRA

Category: Productivity

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 52 keywords for MP Sitting RRA in Apple App Store

Developer: Clavis Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Category: productivity

MP Sitting RRA tracks 52 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 52 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.4, difficulty 37.2.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 52 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.4

Top keyword: documents

Avg difficulty

37.2

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

documents

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 168
68.4
bringing

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 101
64.7
creation

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 115
65.9
core

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 113
67.4
national

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 168
67.7

Unranked opportunities

documents

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Competitors: 168
bringing

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 101
creation

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 115
core

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 113
national

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 168

High competition keywords

manage

Total apps: 95,352 • Major competitors: 1,601

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
available

Total apps: 89,249 • Major competitors: 1,834

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.7
many

Total apps: 77,117 • Major competitors: 1,352

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.6
within

Total apps: 67,459 • Major competitors: 1,296

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.7
makes

Total apps: 56,495 • Major competitors: 765

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
within	68	100	51	81 67,459 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,296 major competitor apps
manage	67	100	52	83 95,352 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,601 major competitor apps
limited	72	100	48	70 14,848 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	335 major competitor apps
available	67	100	55	83 89,249 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,834 major competitor apps
goal	71	100	45	72 20,483 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	311 major competitor apps
many	67	100	51	82 77,117 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,352 major competitor apps
agenda	71	100	34	56 2,088 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	8 major competitor apps
ever	71	100	46	73 23,165 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	529 major competitor apps
members	71	100	49	72 19,782 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	309 major competitor apps
documents	73	100	46	68 12,264 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	168 major competitor apps
increased	71	100	35	58 2,792 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	29 major competitor apps
main	71	100	44	72 20,562 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	222 major competitor apps
bringing	73	100	41	65 7,381 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	101 major competitor apps
cost	71	100	46	72 19,467 competing apps Median installs: 900 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	548 major competitor apps
possibility	72	100	36	59 3,424 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	27 major competitor apps
produced	71	100	37	58 2,914 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	21 major competitor apps
distribution	71	100	35	58 2,811 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	15 major competitor apps
tip	72	100	37	60 3,693 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	32 major competitor apps
past	71	100	45	72 20,387 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.4	—	—	270 major competitor apps
creation	73	100	43	66 8,675 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	115 major competitor apps
preparing	72	100	38	62 5,066 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	37 major competitor apps
core	73	100	42	67 10,665 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	113 major competitor apps
years	72	100	43	70 15,110 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	231 major competitor apps
digitally	71	100	33	53 1,540 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	17 major competitor apps
national	73	100	44	68 11,178 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	168 major competitor apps

App Description

Through Members Sitting App, the National Assembly aims at digitally distributing parliamentary documents and to realise the possibility of enabling Honourable Members of Parliament, to electronically manage the integral agenda for each Parliamentary Sitting.

Achieving a paperless Parliament has been the main goal of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly for many years. ICT is becoming ever more ubiquitous within all organisations and is bringing sustainability, cost cutting and increased effectiveness and efficiency.

The creation and distribution of legislative documents over the past years have been both controlled and limited by the fact that they existed only on paper. It meant that the processes for preparing and disseminating them have been relatively slow, inflexible and expensive. The Members Sitting App makes the core documents produced by the legislature (National Assembly) readily available to Members of Parliament at the tip of their fingers.