QuantomvlrX - iNetAssistant

Category: Lifestyle

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 28 keywords for QuantomvlrX - iNetAssistant in Apple App Store

Developer: 辉马 Category: lifestyle

QuantomvlrX - iNetAssistant tracks 28 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 28 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.9, difficulty 40.1.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 28 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.9

Top keyword: consistent

Avg difficulty

40.1

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

consistent

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 44
63.8
attention

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 54
65.2
client

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 26
66.5
connects

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 53
67.1
window

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 35.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 25
58.7

Unranked opportunities

consistent

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Competitors: 44
attention

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 54
client

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 26
connects

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 53
window

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 35.6 • Competitors: 25

High competition keywords

data

Total apps: 85,873 • Major competitors: 496

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.8
user

Total apps: 66,296 • Major competitors: 473

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.7
users

Total apps: 61,105 • Major competitors: 371

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.3
receive

Total apps: 56,649 • Major competitors: 460

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.1
service

Total apps: 54,861 • Major competitors: 432

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.0

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
communication	71	100	43	72 19,403 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	70 major competitor apps
try	69	100	47	77 40,820 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	514 major competitor apps
users	68	100	48	80 61,105 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	371 major competitor apps
needs	70	100	45	74 26,180 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	164 major competitor apps
connection	70	100	45	74 25,933 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	222 major competitor apps
service	68	100	48	79 54,861 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	432 major competitor apps
pay	70	100	46	76 34,045 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	425 major competitor apps
open	69	100	46	77 37,877 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	348 major competitor apps
receive	68	100	48	80 56,649 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	460 major competitor apps
user	68	100	49	81 66,296 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	473 major competitor apps
two	70	100	45	75 31,647 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	222 major competitor apps
data	67	100	50	83 85,873 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	496 major competitor apps
consistent	73	100	38	64 6,473 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.4	—	—	44 major competitor apps
number	69	100	47	78 44,617 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	341 major competitor apps
send	69	100	47	78 45,695 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	499 major competitor apps
attention	73	100	39	65 7,836 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	54 major competitor apps
client	73	100	40	67 9,405 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	26 major competitor apps
window	72	100	36	59 3,229 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	25 major competitor apps
guaranteed	71	100	36	58 2,843 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	60 major competitor apps
server	72	100	38	63 5,977 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	40 major competitor apps
debugging	68	100	23	39 206 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	1 major competitor apps
udp	67	100	23	37 167 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	2 major competitor apps
port	71	100	33	55 1,805 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 3.8	—	—	10 major competitor apps
user needs	67	100	23	38 183 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	0 major competitor apps
connects	73	100	41	67 10,233 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	53 major competitor apps

App Description

TCP&UDP communication debugging tool, users who need it can try it. The user needs to open the application, one opens the connection as a server, and the other connects to the server window as a client, so that the two windows can send and receive data to each other, pay attention to the client It is consistent with the service port number and guaranteed to be under the same LAN.