Art of Stat: Resampling
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 77 keywords for Art of Stat: Resampling in Apple App Store
Art of Stat: Resampling tracks 77 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 77 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 48.5, difficulty 37.2.
Tracked keywords
77
0 ranked • 77 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
48.5
Top keyword: find
Avg difficulty
37.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 86.3
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,481
- 88.7
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,805
- 84.7
create
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,155
- 82.3
share
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 62.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 916
- 68.6
art
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 202
Unranked opportunities
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Competitors: 1,481
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
create
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.6 • Competitors: 1,155
share
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 62.6 • Competitors: 916
art
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 202
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
find
Total apps: 6,521 • Major competitors: 1,481
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.8
create
Total apps: 5,537 • Major competitors: 1,155
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.6
share
Total apps: 4,336 • Major competitors: 916
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.6
based
Total apps: 3,039 • Major competitors: 697
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| share | 58 | 100 | 63 | 82 4,336 competing apps Median installs: 258,138 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 916 major competitor apps |
| art | 58 | 100 | 47 | 69 1,082 competing apps Median installs: 239,212 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 202 major competitor apps |
| information | 58 | 100 | 57 | 78 2,704 competing apps Median installs: 252,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 572 major competitor apps |
| content | 58 | 100 | 57 | 76 2,368 competing apps Median installs: 245,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 481 major competitor apps |
| file | 58 | 100 | 49 | 60 459 competing apps Median installs: 234,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 86 major competitor apps |
| find | 59 | 100 | 64 | 86 6,521 competing apps Median installs: 264,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,481 major competitor apps |
| time | 59 | 100 | 63 | 89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,805 major competitor apps |
| traditional | 58 | 100 | 43 | 61 495 competing apps Median installs: 285,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 111 major competitor apps |
| obtain | 57 | 100 | 46 | 52 189 competing apps Median installs: 228,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| various | 58 | 100 | 50 | 75 2,177 competing apps Median installs: 229,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 374 major competitor apps |
| small | 58 | 100 | 51 | 66 862 competing apps Median installs: 228,538 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 155 major competitor apps |
| test | 58 | 100 | 50 | 73 1,727 competing apps Median installs: 258,500 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 389 major competitor apps |
| students | 57 | 100 | 38 | 54 253 competing apps Median installs: 213,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 38 major competitor apps |
| tests | 20 | 100 | 39 | 54 232 competing apps Median installs: 269,488 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 59 major competitor apps |
| create | 59 | 100 | 61 | 85 5,537 competing apps Median installs: 251,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,155 major competitor apps |
| second | 57 | 100 | 43 | 58 382 competing apps Median installs: 261,788 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 78 major competitor apps |
| following | 58 | 100 | 47 | 70 1,211 competing apps Median installs: 266,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 263 major competitor apps |
| generate | 58 | 100 | 44 | 61 523 competing apps Median installs: 229,975 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 91 major competitor apps |
| teachers | 57 | 100 | 39 | 50 168 competing apps Median installs: 279,638 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| enter | 58 | 100 | 51 | 67 943 competing apps Median installs: 278,125 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 220 major competitor apps |
| statistical | 56 | 100 | 19 | 30 21 competing apps Median installs: 154,050 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| two | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,253 competing apps Median installs: 238,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 249 major competitor apps |
| screen | 58 | 100 | 55 | 73 1,748 competing apps Median installs: 253,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 360 major competitor apps |
| understand | 58 | 100 | 44 | 65 776 competing apps Median installs: 244,462 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 142 major competitor apps |
| data | 58 | 100 | 55 | 77 2,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,338 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 472 major competitor apps |
App Description
Modern statistical calculator for teachers and students of statistics.
The Art of Stat: Resampling app lets you find bootstrap confidence intervals and permutation P-values. The app illustrates the procedures interactively so you can understand how they work. Several example datasets are preloaded for you to explore, but you can also enter your own data or import a CSV file.
The following resampling methods are implemented:
- Bootstrap Confidence Interval for a population mean, median, or standard deviation.
- Bootstrap Confidence Interval for a population proportion or the population odds.
- Bootstrap Confidence Interval for a population correlation (Pearson and Spearman) or the population slope of a regression model.
- Bootstrap Confidence Interval for the difference of two population means or medians.
- Permutation Test for a population mean or median.
- Permutation Test for the difference of two population means or medians.
- Permutation Test for the independence of two categorical variables (Permutation Chi-Squared Test)
Easily find the bootstrap confidence interval based on the percentile and other methods. For inference about population means, compare results to traditional methods based on the Student-t distribution. For the Chi-squared test of independence, compare to the results from Pearson's Chi-squared test.
Each procedure has three screens:
1) Enter Data on the first screen in various ways, and obtain descriptive statistics and corresponding graphs (Histogram, Boxplot, Bar Chart).
2) Generate the bootstrap or permutation distribution on the second screen, step-by-step, or 1,000 at a time.
3) Obtain the Bootstrap Confidence Interval or Permutation P-value on the third screen, along with lots of supporting information and comparison to classical, central-limit-based inference.
The app comes with several example datasets pre-loaded, but you can also upload your own .CSV file or create one in the Data Editor.
Easily share results by taking screenshots.
Unlock all content for a one-time small fee!