Eligibility criteria of MHT

Category: Health & Fitness

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 54 keywords for Eligibility criteria of MHT in Apple App Store

Developer: Asociación Española para el Estudio de la Menopausia (AEEM) Category: health_and_fitness

Eligibility criteria of MHT tracks 54 keywords (3 keywords rank; 51 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.0, difficulty 39.9, best rank 11.

Tracked keywords

3 ranked • 51 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 11 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.0

Top keyword: document

Avg difficulty

39.9

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

document

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 132
67.1
patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 33
64.0
professionals

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 73
68.7
development

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 125
68.6
conditions

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 232
67.5

Unranked opportunities

document

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Competitors: 132
patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 33
professionals

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 73
development

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 125
conditions

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 232

High competition keywords

download

Total apps: 123,090 • Major competitors: 2,027

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
best

Total apps: 117,438 • Major competitors: 2,620

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
designed

Total apps: 114,471 • Major competitors: 1,080

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
information

Total apps: 112,143 • Major competitors: 1,128

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
choose

Total apps: 90,146 • Major competitors: 1,766

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
eligible	71	100	65	56 2,241 competing apps Median installs: 2,850 Avg rating: 4.2	18	11	166 major competitor apps
eligibility	70	100	39	48 752 competing apps Median installs: 1,100 Avg rating: 4.0	15	15	54 major competitor apps
criteria	70	100	37	53 1,478 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	20	20	26 major competitor apps
download	66	100	54	85 123,090 competing apps Median installs: 411 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,027 major competitor apps
best	66	100	54	85 117,438 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,620 major competitor apps
collect	70	100	50	76 33,298 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	977 major competitor apps
support	67	100	52	82 75,083 competing apps Median installs: 512 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,105 major competitor apps
digital	69	100	49	78 46,511 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	703 major competitor apps
information	66	100	52	84 112,143 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,128 major competitor apps
used	69	100	49	79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	502 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	52	85 114,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,080 major competitor apps
educational	71	100	45	73 22,308 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	207 major competitor apps
choose	67	100	53	83 90,146 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,766 major competitor apps
program	72	100	44	71 17,297 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	228 major competitor apps
visit	70	100	47	75 29,502 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	687 major competitor apps
document	73	100	42	67 10,285 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	132 major competitor apps
helping	71	100	44	71 18,587 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	208 major competitor apps
patient	73	100	39	64 6,705 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	33 major competitor apps
professionals	73	100	42	69 12,697 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	73 major competitor apps
user	68	100	50	81 66,932 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	967 major competitor apps
provided	71	100	44	72 19,097 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	179 major competitor apps
decision	72	100	39	63 5,519 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	59 major competitor apps
data	67	100	51	83 86,751 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,000 major competitor apps
based	67	100	51	82 79,669 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,056 major competitor apps
development	73	100	42	69 12,637 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	125 major competitor apps

App Description

MHT Eligibility Criteria is an App designed with the aim of helping professionals to choose the most appropriate hormone therapy for each woman. Based on the answers to a questionnaire, the program identifies the treatment of climacteric symptoms that best suits the conditions of the user. This information is provided for educational and informational purposes only, serves as a decision support for the practitioner and should not be used as a substitute for individualized physician assessment, nor does it replace the physician-patient assessment. The App does not collect user data and is endorsed by the AEEM.

It has been designed based on the consensus document on MHT eligibility criteria, published by the AEEM with the support of 21 other scientific societies (https://aeem.es/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/criterios-de-elegibilidad-electronico.pdf).

For more information, download the app or visit http://www.aeem.es.

Theramex has contributed to the digital development of the App.