KGateway
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 45 keywords for KGateway in Apple App Store
KGateway tracks 45 keywords (3 keywords rank; 42 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.1, difficulty 40.5, best rank 95.
Tracked keywords
45
3 ranked • 42 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 95 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.1
Top keyword: perform
Avg difficulty
40.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.1
perform
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 104
- 64.9
risk
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 87
- 67.0
fi
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 273
- 63.1
gateway
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank 107
Competitors: 44
- 58.9
connectivity
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 36.5 • Rank 153
Competitors: 37
Unranked opportunities
perform
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 104
risk
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 87
fi
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Competitors: 273
internal
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 37.7 • Competitors: 39
sensor
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 35.6 • Competitors: 24
High competition keywords
using
Total apps: 115,141 • Major competitors: 1,548
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
information
Total apps: 112,143 • Major competitors: 1,128
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
data
Total apps: 86,751 • Major competitors: 1,000
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
connect
Total apps: 60,751 • Major competitors: 937
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.2
first
Total apps: 56,298 • Major competitors: 898
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gateway | 72 | 100 | 39 | 63 5,917 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | 107 | 95 | 44 major competitor apps |
| configuration | 71 | 100 | 35 | 58 2,892 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 3.8 | 146 | 103 | 21 major competitor apps |
| connectivity | 72 | 100 | 37 | 59 3,287 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | 153 | 144 | 37 major competitor apps |
| security | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 20,712 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 409 major competitor apps |
| internal | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,106 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 39 major competitor apps |
| device | 69 | 100 | 50 | 79 50,271 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 843 major competitor apps |
| connected | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 34,135 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 452 major competitor apps |
| sensor | 72 | 100 | 36 | 58 3,072 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 24 major competitor apps |
| scan | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 21,575 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 413 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 84 112,143 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,128 major competitor apps |
| permission | 71 | 100 | 39 | 57 2,704 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 57 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 502 major competitor apps |
| needs | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 26,038 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 316 major competitor apps |
| connection | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 26,103 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 419 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,548 major competitor apps |
| connect | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 60,751 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 937 major competitor apps |
| provision | 69 | 100 | 27 | 46 530 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| ios | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 32,381 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 427 major competitor apps |
| devices | 71 | 100 | 48 | 73 24,538 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 448 major competitor apps |
| following | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 28,825 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 470 major competitor apps |
| location | 69 | 100 | 48 | 76 36,408 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 491 major competitor apps |
| must | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 28,591 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 496 major competitor apps |
| required | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 18,792 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 236 major competitor apps |
| perform | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,666 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 104 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 51 | 83 86,751 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,000 major competitor apps |
App Description
1. Wi-Fi connection information.
2. BLE scan parameters, filter parameters.
3. HTTP or MQTT server information connected by the gateway.
After provision by the app, the gateway(BLE/Wi-Fi) can connect the BLE Beacon/Sensor devices, and can report the sensor data from Beacon/Sensor devices to the cloud.
Why does this app need location permission?
Because the app needs to scan the SSID information of the KGateway when configuring the KGateway for the first time, and the location permission is required for IOS to scan the Wi-Fi SSID information.
Why does this app use the HTTP not HTTPs protocol?
This app only uses HTTP protocol to connect to the KGatway(WiFI-BLE gateway) for provision. Because the KGateway's internal resources are limited, the device only supports the HTTP protocol. In addition, because the app will only perform provisioning when the KGateway is used for the first time, and the app and the KGateway device must be under the same Wi-Fi router during provisioning, the security risk of using the HTTP protocol for Provisioning is controllable.