4AT clinical test for delirium
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 30 keywords for 4AT clinical test for delirium in Apple App Store
4AT clinical test for delirium tracks 30 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 30 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.6, difficulty 42.5.
Tracked keywords
30
0 ranked • 30 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.6
Top keyword: accuracy
Avg difficulty
42.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.0
accuracy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 75
- 64.6
routine
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 86
- 62.1
detection
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 81
- 67.8
less
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 207
- 67.5
highly
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 176
Unranked opportunities
accuracy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 75
routine
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 86
detection
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 81
less
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.0 • Competitors: 207
highly
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 176
High competition keywords
easy
Total apps: 141,489 • Major competitors: 2,053
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.0
best
Total apps: 124,594 • Major competitors: 2,642
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
designed
Total apps: 113,940 • Major competitors: 1,088
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
simple
Total apps: 109,530 • Major competitors: 1,459
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6
high
Total apps: 54,082 • Major competitors: 810
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 124,594 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,642 major competitor apps |
| easy | 66 | 100 | 53 | 86 141,489 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,053 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 50,532 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 503 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 51 | 84 113,940 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,088 major competitor apps |
| special | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 48,127 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,056 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,391 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |
| test | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 42,098 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 714 major competitor apps |
| effective | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,929 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 146 major competitor apps |
| tools | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 36,521 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 596 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 48 | 79 53,498 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 383 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 52 | 84 109,530 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,459 major competitor apps |
| accuracy | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 8,162 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 75 major competitor apps |
| routine | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,698 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 86 major competitor apps |
| completion | 72 | 100 | 36 | 59 3,780 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 25 major competitor apps |
| high | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 54,082 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 810 major competitor apps |
| studies | 71 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,647 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| practice | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 34,082 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 345 major competitor apps |
| short | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,268 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 267 major competitor apps |
| expected | 71 | 100 | 34 | 54 1,683 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 20 major competitor apps |
| detection | 73 | 100 | 40 | 62 5,418 competing apps Median installs: 529 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 81 major competitor apps |
| less | 73 | 100 | 45 | 68 11,976 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 207 major competitor apps |
| highly | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 11,421 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 176 major competitor apps |
| clinical | 73 | 100 | 38 | 63 6,089 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| sensitive | 73 | 100 | 39 | 62 5,609 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 58 major competitor apps |
| validated | 70 | 100 | 30 | 49 869 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 10 major competitor apps |
App Description
The 4AT is the best validated delirium tool in the literature. There are more than 25 diagnostic test accuracy studies involving more than 5000 patients. It is highly sensitive and specific.
The 4AT is now one of the most commonly-used tools in practice globally.
It is proven in routine care, with high completion rates and delirium detection at expected clinical rates.