iPerf Tools
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 35 keywords for iPerf Tools in Apple App Store
iPerf Tools tracks 35 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 35 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.1, difficulty 37.0.
Tracked keywords
35
0 ranked • 35 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.1
Top keyword: print
Avg difficulty
37.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.5
print
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 75
- 66.5
client
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 26
- 67.0
issues
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 48
- 62.6
loss
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 37.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 54
- 69.4
size
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 125
Unranked opportunities
print
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 75
client
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 26
issues
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 48
loss
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 37.8 • Competitors: 54
size
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 125
High competition keywords
create
Total apps: 118,292 • Major competitors: 1,230
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
multiple
Total apps: 67,874 • Major competitors: 579
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.8
contact
Total apps: 58,624 • Major competitors: 375
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.2
via
Total apps: 57,312 • Major competitors: 376
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.1
please
Total apps: 56,716 • Major competitors: 520
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| library | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 20,603 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 197 major competitor apps |
| single | 69 | 100 | 46 | 76 37,040 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 313 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 48 | 80 57,312 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 376 major competitor apps |
| contact | 68 | 100 | 48 | 80 58,624 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 375 major competitor apps |
| date | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 40,153 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 265 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 67,874 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 579 major competitor apps |
| run | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 22,268 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 259 major competitor apps |
| delay | 71 | 100 | 34 | 57 2,441 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 15 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 118,292 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,230 major competitor apps |
| please | 68 | 100 | 48 | 80 56,716 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 520 major competitor apps |
| 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 9,381 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 75 major competitor apps | |
| streams | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,163 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| loss | 72 | 100 | 38 | 63 5,522 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 54 major competitor apps |
| specified | 71 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,511 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| size | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 13,973 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 125 major competitor apps |
| net | 72 | 100 | 36 | 60 3,996 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| client | 73 | 100 | 40 | 67 9,408 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| issues | 73 | 100 | 40 | 67 10,096 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 48 major competitor apps |
| window | 72 | 100 | 36 | 59 3,230 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 25 major competitor apps |
| read | 69 | 100 | 46 | 76 36,911 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 310 major competitor apps |
| server | 72 | 100 | 38 | 63 5,980 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 40 major competitor apps |
| tcp | 68 | 100 | 24 | 40 231 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| udp | 67 | 100 | 23 | 37 167 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| simultaneously | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,347 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| accepts | 69 | 100 | 29 | 48 718 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
App Description
* Use the up to date iPerf3 library (3.13)
* TCP and SCTP
Measure bandwidth
Report MSS/MTU size and observed read sizes.
Support for TCP window size via socket buffers.
* UDP
Client can create UDP streams of specified bandwidth.
Measure packet loss
Measure delay jitter
Multicast capable
* Cross-platform: Windows, Linux, Android, MacOS X, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, VxWorks, Solaris,...
* Client and server can have multiple simultaneous connections.
* Server handles multiple connections, rather than quitting after a single test.
* Can run for specified time.
* Print periodic, intermediate bandwidth, jitter, and loss reports.
* A server accepts a single client simultaneously (iPerf3).
Support information
If there is any issues or feedback, please don't hesitate to contact support@xnano.net