iPerf Tools
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 38 keywords for iPerf Tools in Apple App Store
iPerf Tools tracks 38 keywords (3 keywords rank; 35 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.2, difficulty 37.8, best rank 47.
Tracked keywords
38
3 ranked • 35 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 47 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: print
Avg difficulty
37.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.5
print
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 151
- 62.8
loss
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 108
- 67.0
client
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 61
- 66.5
issues
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 102
- 63.3
server
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 90
Unranked opportunities
print
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 151
loss
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 108
client
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 61
issues
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 102
server
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 90
High competition keywords
create
Total apps: 130,849 • Major competitors: 2,321
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
multiple
Total apps: 76,388 • Major competitors: 1,126
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.5
contact
Total apps: 63,350 • Major competitors: 751
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.0
via
Total apps: 56,661 • Major competitors: 766
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.9
please
Total apps: 56,169 • Major competitors: 984
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bandwidth | 70 | 100 | 32 | 50 969 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.0 | 49 | 47 | 25 major competitor apps |
| latency | 70 | 100 | 33 | 49 900 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.0 | 49 | 49 | 24 major competitor apps |
| lag | 69 | 100 | 28 | 44 466 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.0 | 197 | 197 | 13 major competitor apps |
| library | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 22,684 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 364 major competitor apps |
| single | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 41,015 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 614 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 56,661 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 766 major competitor apps |
| contact | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 63,350 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 751 major competitor apps |
| date | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 44,178 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 497 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 76,388 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,126 major competitor apps |
| run | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 24,005 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 501 major competitor apps |
| delay | 71 | 100 | 36 | 57 2,639 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 41 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 55 | 85 130,849 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,321 major competitor apps |
| please | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 56,169 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 984 major competitor apps |
| 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 9,988 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 151 major competitor apps | |
| streams | 71 | 100 | 36 | 55 2,131 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| loss | 73 | 100 | 39 | 63 5,990 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 108 major competitor apps |
| specified | 71 | 100 | 36 | 57 2,695 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 19 major competitor apps |
| size | 72 | 100 | 44 | 69 14,921 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 253 major competitor apps |
| net | 72 | 100 | 37 | 60 4,341 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 67 major competitor apps |
| client | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,699 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 61 major competitor apps |
| issues | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,024 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 102 major competitor apps |
| window | 72 | 100 | 37 | 59 3,532 competing apps Median installs: 436 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 37 major competitor apps |
| read | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 40,224 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 614 major competitor apps |
| server | 73 | 100 | 39 | 63 6,440 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 90 major competitor apps |
| tcp | 68 | 100 | 24 | 40 242 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
App Description
* Use the up to date iPerf3 library (3.13)
* TCP and SCTP
Measure bandwidth
Report MSS/MTU size and observed read sizes.
Support for TCP window size via socket buffers.
* UDP
Client can create UDP streams of specified bandwidth.
Measure packet loss
Measure delay jitter
Multicast capable
* Cross-platform: Windows, Linux, Android, MacOS X, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, VxWorks, Solaris,...
* Client and server can have multiple simultaneous connections.
* Server handles multiple connections, rather than quitting after a single test.
* Can run for specified time.
* Print periodic, intermediate bandwidth, jitter, and loss reports.
* A server accepts a single client simultaneously (iPerf3).
Support information
If there is any issues or feedback, please don't hesitate to contact support@xnano.net