iPerf Tools
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 35 keywords for iPerf Tools in Apple App Store
iPerf Tools tracks 35 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 35 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 47.5, difficulty 37.7.
Tracked keywords
35
0 ranked • 35 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
47.5
Top keyword: create
Avg difficulty
37.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 84.7
create
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,155
- 66.5
library
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 195
- 71.9
single
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 294
- 75.1
via
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 427
- 74.0
contact
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 358
Unranked opportunities
create
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.6 • Competitors: 1,155
library
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.7 • Competitors: 195
single
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 294
via
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.0 • Competitors: 427
contact
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.3 • Competitors: 358
High competition keywords
create
Total apps: 5,537 • Major competitors: 1,155
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.6
multiple
Total apps: 2,846 • Major competitors: 550
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
please
Total apps: 2,739 • Major competitors: 552
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
via
Total apps: 2,102 • Major competitors: 427
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
contact
Total apps: 1,869 • Major competitors: 358
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| library | 58 | 100 | 55 | 66 870 competing apps Median installs: 257,362 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 195 major competitor apps |
| single | 58 | 100 | 50 | 72 1,511 competing apps Median installs: 234,575 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 294 major competitor apps |
| via | 58 | 100 | 55 | 75 2,102 competing apps Median installs: 260,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 427 major competitor apps |
| contact | 58 | 100 | 53 | 74 1,869 competing apps Median installs: 241,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 358 major competitor apps |
| date | 58 | 100 | 55 | 70 1,250 competing apps Median installs: 269,412 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 58 | 100 | 54 | 78 2,846 competing apps Median installs: 239,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 550 major competitor apps |
| run | 58 | 100 | 47 | 70 1,204 competing apps Median installs: 261,300 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 249 major competitor apps |
| delay | 57 | 100 | 30 | 42 72 competing apps Median installs: 241,450 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 13 major competitor apps |
| create | 59 | 100 | 61 | 85 5,537 competing apps Median installs: 251,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,155 major competitor apps |
| please | 58 | 100 | 53 | 78 2,739 competing apps Median installs: 250,125 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 552 major competitor apps |
| 57 | 100 | 42 | 58 351 competing apps Median installs: 258,550 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 74 major competitor apps | |
| streams | 57 | 100 | 38 | 46 111 competing apps Median installs: 216,425 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 22 major competitor apps |
| loss | 57 | 100 | 38 | 54 254 competing apps Median installs: 264,175 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 51 major competitor apps |
| specified | 57 | 100 | 38 | 41 64 competing apps Median installs: 195,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| size | 58 | 100 | 44 | 62 569 competing apps Median installs: 260,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 124 major competitor apps |
| net | 57 | 100 | 34 | 49 147 competing apps Median installs: 260,225 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 29 major competitor apps |
| client | 57 | 100 | 33 | 48 133 competing apps Median installs: 248,400 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 23 major competitor apps |
| issues | 57 | 100 | 39 | 57 337 competing apps Median installs: 231,675 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 54 major competitor apps |
| window | 20 | 100 | 37 | 45 97 competing apps Median installs: 241,975 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| read | 58 | 100 | 56 | 72 1,495 competing apps Median installs: 261,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 305 major competitor apps |
| server | 57 | 100 | 38 | 53 219 competing apps Median installs: 255,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 40 major competitor apps |
| tcp | 0 | 26 | 15 | 14 3 competing apps Median installs: 328,550 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| udp | 0 | 56 | 16 | 20 7 competing apps Median installs: 212,725 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| simultaneously | 57 | 100 | 30 | 44 87 competing apps Median installs: 178,725 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| accepts | 20 | 100 | 34 | 33 28 competing apps Median installs: 421,625 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |
App Description
* Use the up to date iPerf3 library (3.13)
* TCP and SCTP
Measure bandwidth
Report MSS/MTU size and observed read sizes.
Support for TCP window size via socket buffers.
* UDP
Client can create UDP streams of specified bandwidth.
Measure packet loss
Measure delay jitter
Multicast capable
* Cross-platform: Windows, Linux, Android, MacOS X, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, VxWorks, Solaris,...
* Client and server can have multiple simultaneous connections.
* Server handles multiple connections, rather than quitting after a single test.
* Can run for specified time.
* Print periodic, intermediate bandwidth, jitter, and loss reports.
* A server accepts a single client simultaneously (iPerf3).
Support information
If there is any issues or feedback, please don't hesitate to contact support@xnano.net