Laser Measure - LiDAR Powered
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 46 keywords for Laser Measure - LiDAR Powered in Apple App Store
Laser Measure - LiDAR Powered tracks 46 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 46 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 51.2, difficulty 39.6.
Tracked keywords
46
0 ranked • 46 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
51.2
Top keyword: easy
Avg difficulty
39.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 85.2
easy
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,246
- 77.7
level
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 638
- 79.1
whether
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 59.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 715
- 71.9
intuitive
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 270
- 74.5
directly
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 58.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 424
Unranked opportunities
easy
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.0 • Competitors: 1,246
level
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.8 • Competitors: 638
whether
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 59.3 • Competitors: 715
intuitive
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Competitors: 270
directly
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 58.3 • Competitors: 424
High competition keywords
easy
Total apps: 5,849 • Major competitors: 1,246
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.0
whether
Total apps: 3,139 • Major competitors: 715
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.3
level
Total apps: 2,734 • Major competitors: 638
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.8
data
Total apps: 2,494 • Major competitors: 472
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.6
directly
Total apps: 1,959 • Major competitors: 424
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| level | 58 | 100 | 54 | 78 2,734 competing apps Median installs: 274,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 638 major competitor apps |
| easy | 59 | 100 | 59 | 85 5,849 competing apps Median installs: 250,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,246 major competitor apps |
| whether | 58 | 100 | 59 | 79 3,139 competing apps Median installs: 267,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 715 major competitor apps |
| tech | 57 | 100 | 47 | 55 282 competing apps Median installs: 255,288 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| sensor | 57 | 100 | 28 | 42 71 competing apps Median installs: 162,650 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 58 | 100 | 48 | 72 1,513 competing apps Median installs: 238,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 270 major competitor apps |
| directly | 58 | 100 | 58 | 74 1,959 competing apps Median installs: 280,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 424 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 792 competing apps Median installs: 240,225 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 140 major competitor apps |
| interface | 58 | 100 | 44 | 66 871 competing apps Median installs: 226,050 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 136 major competitor apps |
| intuitive interface | 57 | 100 | 32 | 48 133 competing apps Median installs: 288,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 25 major competitor apps |
| face | 58 | 100 | 52 | 71 1,323 competing apps Median installs: 256,525 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 269 major competitor apps |
| eliminating | 57 | 100 | 31 | 42 69 competing apps Median installs: 217,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 15 major competitor apps |
| camera | 58 | 100 | 48 | 68 1,051 competing apps Median installs: 235,575 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 199 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 57 | 100 | 39 | 52 203 competing apps Median installs: 194,625 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 41 major competitor apps |
| equipped | 57 | 100 | 34 | 49 152 competing apps Median installs: 215,675 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 34 major competitor apps |
| professional | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,261 competing apps Median installs: 250,825 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 225 major competitor apps |
| data | 58 | 100 | 55 | 77 2,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,338 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 472 major competitor apps |
| standard | 58 | 100 | 43 | 62 541 competing apps Median installs: 259,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 114 major competitor apps |
| simplifies | 57 | 100 | 31 | 46 103 competing apps Median installs: 212,525 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 19 major competitor apps |
| complex | 58 | 100 | 41 | 60 442 competing apps Median installs: 209,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 67 major competitor apps |
| precision | 20 | 100 | 41 | 56 293 competing apps Median installs: 315,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 74 major competitor apps |
| scanner | 57 | 100 | 46 | 56 291 competing apps Median installs: 291,300 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 65 major competitor apps |
| engineer | 56 | 100 | 20 | 27 15 competing apps Median installs: 298,275 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| deliver | 58 | 100 | 44 | 59 426 competing apps Median installs: 299,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 103 major competitor apps |
| ipads | 56 | 100 | 22 | 35 33 competing apps Median installs: 186,450 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
App Description
Unlike other rangefinder apps, it retrieves raw distance data directly from the depth sensor, eliminating the need for complex algorithms to estimate distances and ensuring superior accuracy.
How It Works:
Combines the rear standard camera and depth sensor (LiDAR/TrueDepth) to calculate distances.
Supported Devices:
All iPhones and iPads equipped with a LiDAR scanner or Face ID functionality.
Contact Us:
Email: darkce97@gmail.com