Screen Record: Recording It!
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 141 keywords for Screen Record: Recording It! in Apple App Store
Screen Record: Recording It! tracks 141 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 141 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 52.2, difficulty 41.9.
Tracked keywords
141
0 ranked • 141 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
52.2
Top keyword: time
Avg difficulty
41.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 88.7
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,805
- 87.6
like
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,767
- 83.2
unique
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,009
- 78.6
online
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 59.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 689
- 75.5
challenge
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 496
Unranked opportunities
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
like
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Competitors: 1,767
unique
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.5 • Competitors: 1,009
online
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 59.0 • Competitors: 689
challenge
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.2 • Competitors: 496
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
like
Total apps: 7,508 • Major competitors: 1,767
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
unique
Total apps: 4,782 • Major competitors: 1,009
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
different
Total apps: 4,440 • Major competitors: 823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
want
Total apps: 4,034 • Major competitors: 840
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| online | 58 | 100 | 59 | 79 2,997 competing apps Median installs: 268,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 689 major competitor apps |
| challenge | 58 | 100 | 51 | 75 2,171 competing apps Median installs: 283,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 496 major competitor apps |
| 58 | 100 | 51 | 66 852 competing apps Median installs: 240,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 173 major competitor apps | |
| feed | 58 | 100 | 53 | 60 472 competing apps Median installs: 266,362 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 104 major competitor apps |
| gifs | 20 | 100 | 41 | 43 81 competing apps Median installs: 459,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 23 major competitor apps |
| order | 20 | 100 | 61 | 73 1,756 competing apps Median installs: 288,212 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 456 major competitor apps |
| users | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,979 competing apps Median installs: 259,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 430 major competitor apps |
| audio | 58 | 100 | 50 | 69 1,078 competing apps Median installs: 228,788 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 213 major competitor apps |
| live | 58 | 100 | 61 | 77 2,652 competing apps Median installs: 287,738 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 616 major competitor apps |
| particularly | 57 | 100 | 25 | 38 48 competing apps Median installs: 197,950 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
| simply | 58 | 100 | 52 | 73 1,724 competing apps Median installs: 235,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 356 major competitor apps |
| used | 58 | 100 | 53 | 72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 279 major competitor apps |
| enhance | 58 | 100 | 47 | 69 1,161 competing apps Median installs: 244,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 220 major competitor apps |
| content | 58 | 100 | 57 | 76 2,368 competing apps Median installs: 245,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 481 major competitor apps |
| educational | 58 | 100 | 42 | 62 571 competing apps Median installs: 207,750 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 96 major competitor apps |
| file | 58 | 100 | 49 | 60 459 competing apps Median installs: 234,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 86 major competitor apps |
| time | 59 | 100 | 63 | 89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,805 major competitor apps |
| perfect | 58 | 100 | 56 | 81 3,777 competing apps Median installs: 270,350 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 813 major competitor apps |
| process | 58 | 100 | 45 | 63 624 competing apps Median installs: 224,238 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 122 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 58 | 100 | 54 | 78 2,846 competing apps Median installs: 239,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 550 major competitor apps |
| video | 58 | 100 | 56 | 76 2,262 competing apps Median installs: 268,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 467 major competitor apps |
| various | 58 | 100 | 50 | 75 2,177 competing apps Median installs: 229,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 374 major competitor apps |
| speed | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,198 competing apps Median installs: 273,688 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 273 major competitor apps |
| dynamic | 58 | 100 | 45 | 65 746 competing apps Median installs: 252,150 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 146 major competitor apps |
| monitor | 58 | 100 | 49 | 66 847 competing apps Median installs: 244,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 175 major competitor apps |
App Description
1. Streaming to Multiple Platforms:
- Functionality: This feature enables users to broadcast their screen or camera feed simultaneously to various platforms like YouTube, Twitch, Facebook Live, and others. It's particularly useful for content creators, educators, and professionals who want to maximize their reach across different audiences.
- Technology and Implementation: Achieving this would require robust server infrastructure and seamless integration with various streaming services' APIs. Real-time encoding and transcoding capabilities are crucial to ensure compatibility with different platforms’ requirements.
- User Experience: The interface would need to be intuitive, allowing users to easily select their streaming destinations, adjust settings like resolution and bitrate, and monitor their streams in real-time.
2. Reversing Videos:
- Functionality: This feature allows users to reverse their video clips, creating unique and creative content. This can be used for artistic purposes, in educational content, or simply for entertainment.
- Technology and Implementation: Implementing video reversal would involve developing algorithms that can efficiently process video frames in reverse order without compromising the video quality. This feature would also require a user-friendly editing interface.
- User Experience: Users should be able to easily select the portion of the video they want to reverse and preview the results in real-time. Additional options like reversing the audio track or adjusting the speed of the reversed video could enhance this feature.
3. Converting Video to GIF:
- Functionality: This feature lets users convert segments of their videos into GIFs. GIFs are widely used in social media, messaging, and online forums for their ability to convey emotions, reactions, and messages succinctly.
- Technology and Implementation: The conversion process involves extracting selected frames from a video and compiling them into a looped GIF format. The challenge is to maintain an optimal balance between the GIF’s quality and file size.
-
AppGoblin