Group Check - Bill split and +
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 58 keywords for Group Check - Bill split and + in Apple App Store
Group Check - Bill split and + tracks 58 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 57 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.0, difficulty 40.8, best rank 119.
Tracked keywords
58
1 ranked • 57 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 119 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.0
Top keyword: done
Avg difficulty
40.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.9
done
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 194
- 65.9
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 96
- 68.2
stored
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 102
- 63.6
bill
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 156
- 68.6
accounts
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 297
Unranked opportunities
done
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.5 • Competitors: 194
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 96
stored
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 102
bill
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 156
accounts
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Competitors: 297
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
access
Total apps: 163,515 • Major competitors: 2,635
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
every
Total apps: 120,649 • Major competitors: 2,494
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
share
Total apps: 113,889 • Major competitors: 1,783
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
simple
Total apps: 98,968 • Major competitors: 1,441
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| settle | 70 | 100 | 39 | 53 1,492 competing apps Median installs: 598 Avg rating: 4.2 | 119 | 119 | 31 major competitor apps |
| share | 66 | 100 | 55 | 85 113,889 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,783 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 67,459 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,296 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 45 | 71 18,196 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 195 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| apple | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 41,559 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,159 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 68,625 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,107 major competitor apps |
| ideal | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 21,926 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 239 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 163,515 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,635 major competitor apps |
| others | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 15,992 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 248 major competitor apps |
| managing | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 20,137 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 198 major competitor apps |
| simple | 67 | 100 | 52 | 84 98,968 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,441 major competitor apps |
| suitable | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 13,644 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 184 major competitor apps |
| want | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 83,664 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,431 major competitor apps |
| every | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 120,649 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,494 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 45,489 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 955 major competitor apps |
| done | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 11,448 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 194 major competitor apps |
| expenses | 72 | 100 | 38 | 61 4,377 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 65 major competitor apps |
| feel | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 39,420 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 836 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 51 | 83 86,751 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,000 major competitor apps |
| often | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 8,715 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 96 major competitor apps |
| split | 72 | 100 | 44 | 62 4,828 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 118 major competitor apps |
| stored | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,981 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 102 major competitor apps |
| even | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 81,181 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,850 major competitor apps |
| record | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 32,675 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 401 major competitor apps |
App Description
Features:
* Record and settle shared expenses within a group. Settlements can be done collectively.
* Set percentages for splitting bills.
* iCloud sharing. With an iCloud account, you can share and automatically sync data with others in a group.
* iCloud sync. Data can be automatically synced across multiple Apple devices.
* Privacy. Even this app developers cannot access data stored in iCloud.
Use cases:
* Ideal for couples who often split bills or borrow/lend but feel individual settlements cumbersome, and don't want to use a shared household budget app.
* Suitable for close-knit groups engaged in frequent bill splitting or borrowing/lending, where settling accounts every time becomes a hassle.