Anaglyph 3D
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 129 keywords for Anaglyph 3D in Apple App Store
Anaglyph 3D tracks 129 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 128 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.5, difficulty 39.7, best rank 158.
Tracked keywords
129
1 ranked • 128 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 158 • Latest leader 174
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: depth
Avg difficulty
39.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.1
depth
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank 174
Competitors: 192
- 66.1
objects
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 226
- 63.7
object
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 131
- 67.2
amount
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 186
- 65.5
model
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 109
Unranked opportunities
objects
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 226
object
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 131
amount
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 186
model
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 109
taken
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 75
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 158,924 • Major competitors: 2,938
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.6
like
Total apps: 153,385 • Major competitors: 3,284
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.4
using
Total apps: 114,639 • Major competitors: 1,562
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
view
Total apps: 108,078 • Major competitors: 1,318
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
different
Total apps: 100,117 • Major competitors: 1,707
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| depth | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 12,472 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1 | 174 | 158 | 192 major competitor apps |
| right | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 89,991 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,646 major competitor apps |
| single | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 41,009 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 614 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 158,924 competing apps Median installs: 476 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,938 major competitor apps |
| images | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 28,277 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 316 major competitor apps |
| live | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 66,914 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,176 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 67,154 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,305 major competitor apps |
| image | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 27,956 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 304 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,639 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,562 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 28,694 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 230 major competitor apps |
| video | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 49,567 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 900 major competitor apps |
| special | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 48,122 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,056 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 24,447 competing apps Median installs: 528 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 478 major competitor apps |
| photos | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 37,950 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 634 major competitor apps |
| view | 67 | 100 | 52 | 84 108,078 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,318 major competitor apps |
| improve | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 45,049 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 633 major competitor apps |
| visual | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 27,881 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 304 major competitor apps |
| like | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 153,385 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,284 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 80,154 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 662 major competitor apps |
| without | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 79,932 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,429 major competitor apps |
| brain | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 17,775 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 535 major competitor apps |
| videos | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 34,000 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 604 major competitor apps |
| map | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 26,057 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 395 major competitor apps |
| generate | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 23,809 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 215 major competitor apps |
| generating | 72 | 100 | 34 | 57 2,729 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
App Description
Two photos taken with a slight horizontal offset—mimicking human vision—form a stereo image pair. When viewed with special glasses, Virtual Reality headsets, or free-viewing techniques like cross-eye or parallel viewing, this offset allows the brain to perceive depth, creating a 3D effect.
An anaglyph combines the left and right images of a stereo pair into a single image, creating a 3D effect when viewed with red-cyan glasses. Specifically, the left image is represented in shades of red, while the right image appears in shades of cyan. The color-matching lenses ensure that each eye receives the correct image, enabling depth perception.
Traditionally, a stereo pair is captured with a dual lens or double shot camera, as in our app Cameranaglyph. This app offers an alternative approach, using a single image to generate a stereo pair from depth prediction and machine learning.
Each of your eyes sees a slightly different view because they are spaced apart horizontally. This causes objects to appear slightly shifted between the left and right views. The amount of horizontal shift between common objects in both views is called disparity. Closer objects have a larger disparity than those farther away. You can observe this effect by looking at an object with one eye closed, then switching to the other eye. The closer the object, the more it appears to shift between views. Your brain uses this difference to perceive depth and distance.
Machine learning is a process where computers analyze data to make predictions without being explicitly programmed for each task. It employs a model to detect and analyze patterns within the data. Training involves optimizing the model by iteratively adjusting its parameters using labeled data to minimize prediction errors and improve performance.
One application of machine learning is depth prediction in images, where the model estimates how far objects are from the camera. By training on millions of images, the model learns to recognize visual patterns that indicate depth.
A depth map is an image that represents object distances by encoding them as grayscale pixel values. Using machine learning, it’s possible to predict depth from a single photo or video frame, creating a depth map. The depth map is us