PINVIEW2.0
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 101 keywords for PINVIEW2.0 in Apple App Store
PINVIEW2.0 tracks 101 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 101 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.4, difficulty 40.5.
Tracked keywords
101
0 ranked • 101 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.4
Top keyword: streaming
Avg difficulty
40.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.7
streaming
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 247
- 66.5
issues
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 102
- 65.0
problems
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 99
- 62.1
lower
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 64
- 65.6
viewing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 103
Unranked opportunities
streaming
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 247
issues
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 102
problems
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 99
lower
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 64
viewing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 103
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 181,178 • Major competitors: 2,662
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
experience
Total apps: 135,711 • Major competitors: 2,192
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1
mobile
Total apps: 130,039 • Major competitors: 1,613
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.2
features
Total apps: 126,031 • Major competitors: 2,126
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
using
Total apps: 114,611 • Major competitors: 1,562
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| communication | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 22,270 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 142 major competitor apps |
| video streaming | 69 | 100 | 34 | 46 562 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 18 major competitor apps |
| users | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 60,505 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 675 major competitor apps |
| experience | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 135,711 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,192 major competitor apps |
| live | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 66,922 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,176 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 67,142 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,305 major competitor apps |
| simply | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 44,438 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 596 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 50,532 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 503 major competitor apps |
| content | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 60,394 competing apps Median installs: 501 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 953 major competitor apps |
| created | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 26,292 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 303 major competitor apps |
| connection | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 28,277 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 423 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,611 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,562 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 130,039 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,613 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 49 | 80 62,193 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 543 major competitor apps |
| note | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 16,115 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 262 major competitor apps |
| video | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 49,576 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 900 major competitor apps |
| key features | 72 | 100 | 36 | 58 3,234 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 29 major competitor apps |
| dynamic | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 20,953 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 292 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 181,178 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,662 major competitor apps |
| monitor | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 34,233 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 376 major competitor apps |
| run | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 24,005 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 501 major competitor apps |
| related | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 22,224 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 232 major competitor apps |
| many | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 76,870 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,358 major competitor apps |
| quality | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 58,833 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 786 major competitor apps |
| streaming | 73 | 100 | 50 | 67 10,241 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 247 major competitor apps |
App Description
The app utilizes an advanced transmission system and a large number of servers. In comparison to previous solutions, PINVIEW2.0 offers superior performance in terms of connection rates and transmission speeds.
One of PINVIEW2.0's key features is its ability to resolve communication issues in complex network environments. It effectively addresses problems related to dynamic IPs and lack of public IPs in ADSL, PPPoE, and LAN setups.
Unlike other methods, PINVIEW2.0's system does not require users to apply for dynamic domain names, configure port forwarding, or run DNS clients. Users can access remote viewing by simply using a PINVIEW2.0 ID. The app uses CDN (Content Delivery Network) technology for its servers, a cutting-edge technology widely used in many web platforms. These servers are strategically placed at key network operator nodes to ensure optimal bandwidth. The use of CDN technology greatly enhances PINVIEW2.0's efficiency.
Please note that the quality of live video streaming depends on the network performance and the hardware of the device. If you experience buffering or connection issues during live viewing, consider adjusting the resolution, frame rate, and bitrate of the devices, or switch to a lower streaming quality within the app.